Author Topic: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?  (Read 96949 times)

Nirvana

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5121
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #250 on: December 05, 2010, 10:14:40 AM »
Like I said no coincidence most Coleman fans are complete idiots , show me where I ever typed the word small they are sub-par in relation to his biceps & triceps absolutely in the context of a balance arms that shows great proportion , they're shaped like bowling pins analogous to having high calves , his forearms ( and ironically the lateral head of his triceps ) are shaped like Al Beckles 

so I never claimed his forearms were small pat attention to what the claim is.
either way you're implying that they are not good, don't try to backpedal and get too technical

Immortal_Technique

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2196
  • "It's all a bunch of shit, I say fuck it" - DF
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #251 on: December 05, 2010, 10:15:10 AM »
So Ronnie's arms aren't worse they're just less balanced? I could agree they're less balanced, as this clearly doesn't stop them being the best. You say Dorian's aren't as good, but are more balanced? So really your idea of balance doesn't necessarily help or hinder actual goodness? Mute point or what.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83280
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #252 on: December 05, 2010, 10:18:16 AM »
either way you're implying that they are not good, don't try to backpedal and get too technical

No backpeddling or getting technical I never said ' small ' get it right it's that simple

his forearms are lacking period.


Nirvana

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5121
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #253 on: December 05, 2010, 10:19:48 AM »
No backpeddling or getting technical I never said ' small ' get it right it's that simple

his forearms are lacking period.


thank you for proving my point exactly

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83280
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #254 on: December 05, 2010, 10:22:57 AM »
So Ronnie's arms aren't worse they're just less balanced? I could agree they're less balanced, as this clearly doesn't stop them being the best. You say Dorian's aren't as good, but are more balanced? So really your idea of balance doesn't necessarily help or hinder actual goodness? Mute point or what.

Worse than who?  ??? the original topic whose were the biggest and I think Ronnies were has nothing to do with Dorian



JasonH

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11704
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #255 on: December 05, 2010, 10:25:35 AM »
Dillett.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83280
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #256 on: December 05, 2010, 10:25:48 AM »
thank you for proving my point exactly

no your point was ' small ' I didn't type that  ;)

if you don't think these are lacking then I can't help you  :-\

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83280
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #257 on: December 05, 2010, 10:28:10 AM »
Dillett.

Might come close to Ronnie

Immortal_Technique

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2196
  • "It's all a bunch of shit, I say fuck it" - DF
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #258 on: December 05, 2010, 10:35:23 AM »
Basically, what has Ronnie's sub number one in the world forarms got to do with anything. And if they don't lack for size, or take away from the appearance of his arms relative to other people's arms, then what has your point got to do with this thread?

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83280
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #259 on: December 05, 2010, 10:37:04 AM »
Basically, what has Ronnie's sub number one in the world forarms got to do with anything. And if they don't lack for size, or take away from the appearance of his arms relative to other people's arms, then what has your point got to do with this thread?

The point was morons are claiming I typed they were ' small ' which is inaccurate and like I said I think he probably did have the biggest arms out of all pros

Immortal_Technique

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2196
  • "It's all a bunch of shit, I say fuck it" - DF
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #260 on: December 05, 2010, 10:42:46 AM »
You are taking great pains to dwell on a negative.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83280
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #261 on: December 05, 2010, 10:46:15 AM »
You are taking great pains to dwell on a negative.

Actually I'm not I'm correcting people who are wrong is claiming I typed something I didn't and it's you who went off on a wild tangent totally unrelated to what I was typing.


Immortal_Technique

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2196
  • "It's all a bunch of shit, I say fuck it" - DF
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #262 on: December 05, 2010, 10:51:39 AM »
Nobody cares.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83280
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #263 on: December 05, 2010, 10:53:52 AM »
Nobody cares.

LMFAO says the guy who just bitch & moaned and went off on a tangent about Dorian and the lies about Ronnie's calves HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

you sir on funny  ::)

nobody cares  ;D

disco_stu

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4953
  • I'm a llama!
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #264 on: December 05, 2010, 11:21:44 AM »
Although Dillet and Coleman's arms may have taped the same at 22-23", Dillet had much more volume. Coleman's biceps are like rock hard baseballs.

circumference is related to volume, so i dont get what you mean here...

the only thing that would make the arm have more volume would be the length of the upper arm.

so in relative terms, a shorter upper arm with the same circumference would appear far more volumous.

do you mean peak?

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #265 on: December 05, 2010, 11:23:56 AM »
actually ND you have been quoted as say ronnie's forearms were small, along with his traps.

yes, it was several years ago even before the truce thread, but you have said this.

those of us who have been owning your ass for years know all about it.

might be hard to dig up the exact quote from 4 years ago though.

but many of us know you did.

obviously, you will try and claim to the newer members that you didn't, but thats a complete and total lie and you know it.

nice try though. ::)

Flower Boy Ran Away

Nirvana

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5121
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #266 on: December 05, 2010, 11:36:07 AM »
no your point was ' small ' I didn't type that  ;)

if you don't think these are lacking then I can't help you  :-\
I never quoted you as saying that. other people were saying that and then you jumped the gun and got rilled up about it.

you're implying that ronnie has bad forearms. -point proven

I never said you said ronnie had 'small' forearms. if so show where I did.

Nirvana

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5121
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #267 on: December 05, 2010, 11:40:55 AM »
no your point was ' small ' I didn't type that  ;)

if you don't think these are lacking then I can't help you  :-\
and if you think these forearms are lacking I can't help you


anyone can take a bad forearm shot      <<<<< did you just read that?   -remember it and don't forget about it later.

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #268 on: December 05, 2010, 12:01:19 PM »
Paul Dillett


Go towards the end...he talks (throws up a bicep) about his "flat biceps"


Paul Dillett and Ronnie Coleman posing


I don't know if the first one has Paul training arms, I think it does, because he is wearig that red shirt.

che

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16844
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #269 on: December 05, 2010, 12:20:40 PM »
Paul Dillett


Go towards the end...he talks (throws up a bicep) about his "flat biceps"


Paul Dillett and Ronnie Coleman posing


I don't know if the first one has Paul training arms, I think it does, because he is wearig that red shirt.

Biggest BB I've ever seen in person ,bigger than Greg Kovacks and Ronnie Coleman

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41299
  • An Ethnic Israelite
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #270 on: December 05, 2010, 12:38:00 PM »
ND being a voluntary imbecile again...

Showing one pic of Coleman when he over dieted in 02 and looked like shit and passing it off as if it was what Ronnie looked like the majority of his career. ::)
There is nothing wrong nor has there ever been anything wrong with his forearms...You want to see subpar forearms, compared to to upper arm?  Look at Kai...
Coleman has/had great forearms.  Do they look like Heath's?  No. They are far from "subpar"....If anything his triceps in the side tricep pose is subpar...his out head of his tricep got progressively worse...
7

First Blood

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 981
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #271 on: December 05, 2010, 12:41:44 PM »
to be honest I have never been a fan of ronnie, I think his muscles have a weird shape...quads, abs, arms etc. I don't think he has the best arms, they were of course massive but I don't think they were the best.

dillett was a freak. amazing arms.  I think dillett was superior to ronnie in many ways. he had a better overall structure but his back and chest were lagging.

First Blood

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 981
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #272 on: December 05, 2010, 12:44:32 PM »
also thanks to ND for all the cool pics/scans you post!

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83280
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #273 on: December 05, 2010, 12:44:32 PM »
actually ND you have been quoted as say ronnie's forearms were small, along with his traps.

yes, it was several years ago even before the truce thread, but you have said this.

those of us who have been owning your ass for years know all about it.

might be hard to dig up the exact quote from 4 years ago though.

but many of us know you did.

obviously, you will try and claim to the newer members that you didn't, but thats a complete and total lie and you know it.

nice try though. ::)



WRONG as usual I said his forearms and to small for his biceps and triceps which I proved many times over , idiots like you have piss-poor reading comprehension can't decipher between to small FOR his biceps and triceps and just like the traps I said they were small from the front which I mean narrow when viewed from the front 

See this is what makes you a weasel you think by quoting out of context you accomplished something because as usual you don't have shit and my point still stands that's the best part his forearms were NOT in proportion with his biceps you can't argue that and no amount of trying to steer away from the subject will change that

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83280
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #274 on: December 05, 2010, 12:46:29 PM »
I never quoted you as saying that. other people were saying that and then you jumped the gun and got rilled up about it.

you're implying that ronnie has bad forearms. -point proven

I never said you said ronnie had 'small' forearms. if so show where I did.

you're full of shit as we all know it , you quoted Hulkster and his response was to you using my name , so you didn't say no it wasn't him either , stop playing coy