And i was starting to think you were actually smart.........
Apparently 2 towers weren't enough? You don;t know that because it wasn't only 2 towers. But I'm sure most would agree that 2 towers would have still caused all the changes we see today.
You implied that if the government were behind 911 "2 towers" would have been enough; I threw your logic back in your face by pointing out it wasn’t even enough for ‘19 Muslims with box-cutters’.
One tower could have been enough.
One plane could have been enough.
One thoughtless moderator could have been enough.
The point: Keep your speculation about what is and is not enough to yourself because there is no way to substantiate it and it contradicts both the official 911 conspiracy theory and the many alternate ones.
Yes to all your questions, I have done extensive research in the pentagon part of 9/11 and have had many long detailed discussions with 240 on the subject.
The questions I asked are only part of many questions and facts that make the idea of a missile hitting the pentagon ridiculous(if that is what you are getting at....or is it holograms?
).
But take comfort in the fact that many people like your self who think they are intelligent are moonbots in spite of it all. 
If you had done your research you would not be asking for reasons to strike the Pentagon; the announcement on Sep 10th regarding 2.3 trillion in lost transactions in conjunction with the dozens of accounting staff killed at the Pentagon on 911 provide a plausible motive. Instead you should be focusing what little brainpower you possess on conjuring an explanation for the aforementioned flight path discrepancies between the 911 Commission and NTSB.
I am not holding my breath
