His facts are certainly correct, they would have to be. But, what the Newsweek article that was posted as well as some other arugements being made are that Moores facts are correct but it is the way in which a presents them to the viewer and certain things that are left out of his film(s) that make the movie completely biased towards his viewpoint. Plain and simple. He is not "lying" per-se, but his films are def. slanted toward his view point simply by what facts he chooses to include, exclude and how they are presented.
Example: The U.S. healthcare system is a mess, but he presents Cubas/French system as a crowning achievement in medical effiencey. It isn't. And of course your response will be "FACTS,EVIDENCE" and again, the facts are true, the presentation of those facts unfortunately is not. It's his film, his message and he can do whatever he wants with it. Fair enough.
Oh, and as for "Grand High Wizard" Robert Byrd....he made a complete clown, fool, doddering moron out of himself during his glorious speech. And yes I got a chance to listen to plenty of it and I was embarrased for the poor guy. "CAN YOU HEAR ME!!!....(shuffling of papers, loosing place) BARBARIC!!!.....(shuffling of papers, loosing place) HOMELAND!!!!......" I would ask "How did he get elected" but then again, I could ask that question a hundred or two times about many other members of our wonderful Congress. HOMELAND!!!