I find your choice of words interesting. When refering to low achieving Black people... you refer to them as Blacks.
When refering to low achieving White people... your refer to them as 'White trash'. Why the qualifyer?
Why not say "the reason Black trash doesn't..." along with "the reason white trash doesn't..."?
Why not say "the reason Black people don't..." along with "the reason white people don't..."?
I find it interesting that you can so easily compare the two. Why not compare apples with apples instead?
Making no accusations mind you, ...simply observing a subtle even if unintentioned connotation in your words.
Well, you're right. At least partly right.
Lets agree that the unsuccessful whites are a much smaller group percentagewise than the black ditto.
And lets also agree that culture, not race, is the reason for these differences.
Ie, most brought up in an intellectual and safe environment, will have a solid intellectual foundation once he/she reaches adulthood. And will be a respectful and decent person.
But you're also making a slight mistake in that you're not recognizing the obvious difference between the community and the white community.
What it all boils down to:
In general, there are some problems in the white community.
In general, there are a lot of problems in the black community.
Of course, one could also argue that there are bad, and there are good citizens in USA, regardless of the ethnicity. And then color of skin wouldn't be an aspect.
We could use trailer homing vs picket fences, as variables for bad citizens/good citizens, eg. Or regional differences.
But in this particular topic, we're discussing the ethnic differences, and how those affect society. And what to do.
This is a controversial topic, although for the first time, except for a few posts, I think this discussion has stayed fairly on-topic and has avoided the usual racist bullshit slurs.
Get it?