does marcus ruhl have the largest legs in bodybuilding????

[Bluto]

terrible excuse for a post

why's that? we're not allowed to discuss size and strength in bodybuilders legs? i must admit i had to click on your name, for 3700 posts ive never seen you post before. are you hiding in the hulkster thread or something?

[IceCold]

dont calves count as legs?

[gymguy]

No, Coleman and Branch easily beat him.

[Sir William Idol]

paco

[Bluto]

No, Coleman and Branch easily beat him.

so when they're both being interview when training legs, and ruhl says he got 36 and branch says he got 33, you dont think branch would object?

[BEAST 8692]

so when they're both being interview when training legs, and ruhl says he got 36 and branch says he got 33, you dont think branch would object?

what's he going to say?

"liar liar, pants on fire"

i have no doubt markus' legs are bigger than branch's. he's got a much bigger frame and is taller for one thing.

[bmuscle90]

markus ruhl. not just his legs but his whole build is much bigger than most pros.

[Benny B]

A fat Ruhl at 340? Perhaps.

In contest condition? Ronnie Coleman.

[Hulkster]

dont calves count as legs?

only if you have no idea what you are talking about...

we are talking about LEGS as in quads/hams in terms of circumference.

not calves you moron.

hahahahaha

[ChillZ]

Branch Warren has the sickest legs bar none.  The late Paul Demayo had crazy wheels.

from the younger dudes out there, Trey Brewer

[webcake]

Branch Warren has the sickest legs bar none.  The late Paul Demayo had crazy wheels.

from the younger dudes out there, Trey Brewer

bump old threads much

[monstercalves]

only if you have no idea what you are talking about...

we are talking about LEGS as in quads/hams in terms of circumference.

not calves you moron.

hahahahaha

lmao........why do competitive bodybuilders train calves then if they are not part of the legs or a bodypart at all for that matter?