I dunno. IF he did fuel terror, i'm all for cooking the basatrd.
Problem is, the only group telling me about his terror acts against the US is the white house.
And after the great deal of lies and misstatements they have made, I don't lend much credibility to what they say. Bush went on tv last week and made a dozen statemens which were in DIRECT contradiction to govt reports - in order to paint a rosy picture in Iraq. he fact is, Bush is now a war salesman. period. And he's trying to sell a war on Iran now. So anything he tells us about Admedijahad, well, it could be tainted. When the UN, NATO, or some other group shows proof, I"m all for wasting the crazy bastard in iran. But right now, all we have is Bush, who is so thirsty for another war in Iran...
So now allegations are flying that Iran is really a safe harbor for Al Qaeda and that Iran is arming 'the base' in Iraq.
The Iraqi insurgents are idenitified with Al Qaeda terrorists--that's propaganda.
Iraq is a Shia majority that used to be held in check by the Sunni minority until we attacked and removed Hussein.
The resulting chaos would leave a Shia majority in Iraq sympathetic with the Shia majority in Iran. (There are sub-groups of Shia v Sunni, Shia v Shia, Sunni v Sunni making the true make-up even more confusing).
Since the US lost its "Iran is making an atomic bomb" argument, it is now trying with all its might to bring Iran into the Iraq war. How?
1. The invasion of Iraq itself--the US's illegitimate takeover of Iraq has created an atmosphere of instability and military aggression in the middle east...along with those Aircraft carriers off the coast of Iran.
The US sure is giving the appearance to strike Iran. What's Iran supposed to do? Wait to become victims of another US led liberation attack?
2. False evidence of Iran's arming of "Al Qaeda" in Iraq. "Lieutenant General Raymond Odierno, the second-ranking U.S. commander in Iraq, made the most spectacular claim of Iranian culpability in arming the militias so far when he declared in an interview..., “We have weapons that we know through serial numbers…that trace back to Iran.” He referred specifically to RPG-29s -- armor-piercing rocket-propelled grenades -- and truck-mounted Katyusha rockets captured in Iraq."
"That statement represents a serious leap in logic, because the place in which a weapon was manufactured does not tell us who actually supplied them to Iraqi Shiites. (The United States, for example, has been supplying Iraqi forces with Russian-made RPG-7s.) But in making the claim, Odierno made a major stumble: Iran has never been known to manufacture the RPG-29, so the military could not have captured one with an Iranian serial number. The RPG-29 has always been a Russian-made weapon."
http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=the_blame_gameThe Weapons Black Market is a Black Market, not an Iranian sponsored Black Market. But our government blames Iran for "meddling" every chance it can:
Intelligence Links Iran to Iraqi Insurgent Weapons
Iraq's Foreign Minister Says He Has Seen No Evidence Linking Iran to Insurgency http://www.abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=2866573&page=1
Iran arming Taliban, U.S. claims http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/asiapcf/06/13/iran.taliban/index.htmlBush insists Iran is arming Iraq
‘I’m going to do something about it,’ president says http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17146548/You are right to question the validity of the Bush Administration's claims.
We've heard the certitude in the case for war bullshit before.