Author Topic: The Very Best Of Ronnie Coleman! (Read 10607 times)

Shockwave · « **Reply #1 on:** October 04, 2007, 09:35:47 PM »

96-97-98 Ronnie Is fucking awesome.
I especially liked 96.

bizzy · « **Reply #2 on:** October 04, 2007, 09:47:27 PM »

Good Lord! Look at those arms in the 4th pic. UNREAL!!

Jean Paul Gaultier · « **Reply #3 on:** October 04, 2007, 09:59:43 PM »

When Ronnie was young, he was unstoppable.

AGE, NOTHING MORE NOTHING LESS, IT GETS US ALL!

Hurricane Beef ! · « **Reply #4 on:** October 04, 2007, 10:01:44 PM »

Check out Ronnie's back in this YTV. It will never again be matched.

The Beef

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #5 on:** October 04, 2007, 10:02:54 PM »

01 ASC

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #6 on:** October 04, 2007, 10:05:41 PM »

03 Mr Olympia

Deicide · « **Reply #7 on:** October 04, 2007, 10:19:20 PM »

Very prone to gyno he was...

The_Iron_Disciple · « **Reply #8 on:** October 05, 2007, 12:36:25 AM »

Ronnie TRULY IS the BEST !

Wiggs · « **Reply #9 on:** October 05, 2007, 01:00:13 AM »

His look at the 2001 Arnold was the best IMO even better than 98 O because he had a little more muscle and no gyno.

GroinkTropin · « **Reply #10 on:** October 05, 2007, 01:01:19 AM »

Quote from: Trapezkerl on October 04, 2007, 10:19:20 PM

Very prone to hugeness he was...

FYP

KevinP85 · « **Reply #11 on:** October 05, 2007, 01:13:53 AM »

One of the best for sure! Is it me or does anyone notice that later on in Ronnie's career he seemed to lose a bit of arm size(particularly biceps peak). In some pics that are not posted his arms seem smaller with not as much peak as his earlier career. I don't know, but it could also be how the pics came out or because of the added size he's lost some detail on his physique.

EspenG · « **Reply #12 on:** October 05, 2007, 01:21:59 AM »

At one time - perhaps the best ever.

EspenG · « **Reply #13 on:** October 05, 2007, 01:26:59 AM »

More....

EspenG · « **Reply #14 on:** October 05, 2007, 01:29:55 AM »

Even more... in courtesy of muscletime.com. There are some great galleries over there.

EspenG · « **Reply #15 on:** October 05, 2007, 01:36:17 AM »

Still more...

MAXX · « **Reply #16 on:** October 05, 2007, 01:42:05 AM »

one of the best pictures ive seen of Coleman. Lights out baby!

Shockwave · « **Reply #17 on:** October 05, 2007, 08:30:47 AM »

I didn't like the way Ronnie looked after 98.
IMO, his best was 96, where he had striated quads, and his balance was perfect.
After 98, he seemed to become a jumble of outstanding bodyparts rather than a cohesive physique.

y19mike77 · « **Reply #18 on:** October 05, 2007, 10:28:19 AM »

I am a Jay fan.
But Ronnie in 97 and 98 was and still is unbeatable

OneMoreRep · « **Reply #19 on:** October 05, 2007, 10:48:43 AM »

Unbeatable in this picture..

JasonH · « **Reply #20 on:** October 05, 2007, 10:51:29 AM »

Never was a Ronnie fan but those are excellent pics.

MikeThaMachine · « **Reply #21 on:** October 05, 2007, 10:58:22 AM »

Quote from: Shockwave on October 05, 2007, 08:30:47 AM

I didn't like the way Ronnie looked after 98.
IMO, his best was 96, where he had striated quads, and his balance was perfect.
After 98, he seemed to become a jumble of outstanding bodyparts rather than a cohesive physique.

You mean this Ronnie?

MikeThaMachine · « **Reply #22 on:** October 05, 2007, 11:00:48 AM »

Monster81 · « **Reply #23 on:** October 05, 2007, 11:02:59 AM »

Quote from: bizzy on October 04, 2007, 09:47:27 PM

Good Lord! Look at those arms in the 4th pic. UNREAL!!

unbelivable, and used to hav som good calves too

M75 · « **Reply #24 on:** October 05, 2007, 11:08:39 AM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on October 04, 2007, 10:02:54 PM

01 ASC

Amazing shot, arguably his all time best showing.