« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Have the 2000's lack of conditioning compared to the 90's had something to do  (Read 554 times)

Deicide

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22921
  • Reapers...
Have the 2000's lack of conditioning compared to the 90's had something to do
« on: October 05, 2007, 09:38:19 AM »
with a reduction of the use of diuretics in pre-competition preparation. The bodybuilders of the 90's weren't far better conditioned.

Discuss...
Logged
I hate the State.

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40804
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: Have the 2000's lack of conditioning compared to the 90's had something to do
« Reply #1 on: October 05, 2007, 09:41:38 AM »
No, it has everything to do with the added bodyweight that takes away from the appearance of separation, thus why so many pros looked best when they first became pros.  Then is has to do with long term GH use thickening the skin, so again, less definition and finally insulin....discussion done ;)
Logged
7

mass 04

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11039
Re: Have the 2000's lack of conditioning compared to the 90's had something to do
« Reply #2 on: October 05, 2007, 09:42:40 AM »
Quote from: Big_Wiggs on October 05, 2007, 09:41:38 AM
No, it has everything to do with the added bodyweight that takes away from the appearance of separation, thus why so many pros looked best when they first became pros.  Then is has to do with long term GH use thickening the skin, so again, less definition and finally insulin....discussion done ;)

100% right
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »