Author Topic: ruhl vs. nasser (Read 6732 times)

IceCold · « **on:** October 14, 2007, 11:24:27 PM »

in their prime, who was better - nasser or markus?

discuss.

Matt C · « **Reply #1 on:** October 15, 2007, 12:37:30 AM »

Nasser.

This is even less debatable than the Dorian VS. Ronnie truce thread.

Trev · « **Reply #2 on:** October 15, 2007, 01:11:05 AM »

Nasser BY MILES!!

Mydavid · « **Reply #3 on:** October 15, 2007, 01:17:04 AM »

Quote from: Trev on October 15, 2007, 01:11:05 AM

Nasser BY MILES!!

Oh Trev...You need to stop your thinking...RUHL was much better

Lisa

Matt C · « **Reply #4 on:** October 15, 2007, 01:21:17 AM »

Quote from: Mydavid on October 15, 2007, 01:17:04 AM

Oh Trev...You need to stop your thinking...RUHL was much better

Lisa

Are you saying you have a penchant for big ugly bodies, Lisa?

Trev · « **Reply #5 on:** October 15, 2007, 01:21:36 AM »

Quote from: Mydavid on October 15, 2007, 01:17:04 AM

Oh Trev...You need to stop your thinking...RUHL was much better

Lisa

NOOOOOOOO WAAAAAAAYY - Same levels of Mass, but Nasser had better genetics

Stu · « **Reply #6 on:** October 15, 2007, 01:31:00 AM »

~~gh15~~ nasser, easily

davidpaul · « **Reply #7 on:** October 15, 2007, 02:21:45 AM »

nasser

allpumpedup · « **Reply #8 on:** October 15, 2007, 02:57:21 AM »

Nasser had the total package in 98. Ruhl has an advantage in width and maybe even taper, but never had the conditioning Nasser was able to obtain, so I say Nasser by a mile.

Petrucci · « **Reply #9 on:** October 15, 2007, 03:16:29 AM »

thats not even dabatable...Nasser by a galaxy

davidpaul · « **Reply #10 on:** October 15, 2007, 03:17:27 AM »

nasser got a second place a the O, arguably should have won it that year

MAXX · « **Reply #11 on:** October 15, 2007, 04:05:24 AM »

Ruhl

2002 Noc

davidpaul · « **Reply #12 on:** October 15, 2007, 04:24:36 AM »

Nasser 98 O

webcake · « **Reply #13 on:** October 15, 2007, 05:35:29 AM »

Quote from: MAXX on October 15, 2007, 04:05:24 AM

Ruhl

2002 Noc

x2

Go Ruhl!!

Colossus_1986 · « **Reply #14 on:** October 15, 2007, 05:37:44 AM »

RUUUUUUUUHL:

Andre Nickatina · « **Reply #15 on:** October 15, 2007, 05:42:18 AM »

Why would you start this thread without photos

Bullshit ass shit.

The_Iron_Disciple · « **Reply #16 on:** October 15, 2007, 05:56:15 AM »

I'm a Ruhl Fan but Nasser get's the nod ... ONLY because of the FREAKY Conditioning Nasser was able to attain. Regardless though ... they were BOTH FREAKY ! Oh, and Today ( October 15th ) happens to be his Birthday ... FREAKY Timing, IceCold !

alejandro_torres · « **Reply #17 on:** October 15, 2007, 06:00:29 AM »

nasser

delta9mda · « **Reply #18 on:** October 15, 2007, 06:24:48 AM »

Quote from: davidpaul on October 15, 2007, 03:17:27 AM

nasser got a second place a the O, arguably should have won it that year

not with the back he didnt have.

BayGBM · « **Reply #19 on:** October 15, 2007, 06:58:10 AM »

Andre Nickatina · « **Reply #20 on:** October 15, 2007, 07:01:50 AM »

Quote from: BayGBM on October 15, 2007, 06:58:10 AM

I think I might get that haircut for halloween

slaveboy1980 · « **Reply #21 on:** October 15, 2007, 07:21:53 AM »

Quote from: Mydavid on October 15, 2007, 01:17:04 AM

Oh Trev...You need to stop your thinking...RUHL was much better

Lisa

did nasser borrow money from you?

slaveboy1980 · « **Reply #22 on:** October 15, 2007, 07:23:48 AM »

haha ruhl was great at his best......but he cant beat nasser when he was at his best.

nasser won the mr o 1997.

and if anyone seen nasser on the way 2-3 (looks like shit in nr 1) you will see how good he was.

Mydavid · « **Reply #23 on:** October 15, 2007, 07:44:32 AM »

Quote from: Matt C on October 15, 2007, 01:21:17 AM

Are you saying you have a penchant for big ugly bodies, Lisa?

Lisa

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #24 on:** October 15, 2007, 10:09:48 AM »

Nasser by a mile