Author Topic: Technically, Vince Goodrum is Not a Man  (Read 969 times)

Grundle

  • Time Out
  • Getbig III
  • *
  • Posts: 975
  • "Ruining lives and ratting on friends since '93"
Technically, Vince Goodrum is Not a Man
« on: October 20, 2007, 02:39:11 PM »
1) He lacks a spine

2) He has breast tissue more closely indicative of a woman

3) His passive/aggressive response to being abused is a reflexive female response.
Int. Fed.of Booty Bandits

Mars

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 27707
Re: Technically, Vince Goodrum is Not a Man
« Reply #1 on: October 20, 2007, 02:42:50 PM »
and he's gay.

Grundle

  • Time Out
  • Getbig III
  • *
  • Posts: 975
  • "Ruining lives and ratting on friends since '93"
Re: Technically, Vince Goodrum is Not a Man
« Reply #2 on: October 20, 2007, 03:02:24 PM »
and he's gay.


so you're saying he's a dyke? Hmmm, interesting... :-\
Int. Fed.of Booty Bandits

rk272727

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1169
Re: Technically, Vince Goodrum is Not a Man
« Reply #3 on: October 20, 2007, 04:20:45 PM »
does he wear a bra
b

onlyme

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19328
  • Don't Fuck With Bears
Re: Technically, Vince Goodrum is Not a Man
« Reply #4 on: October 20, 2007, 05:10:12 PM »
Well here is his genitals he posted on Dereks website and his Myspace.  He says he is hung like a horse.  To bad he didn't say a female horse.

Grundle

  • Time Out
  • Getbig III
  • *
  • Posts: 975
  • "Ruining lives and ratting on friends since '93"
Re: Technically, Vince Goodrum is Not a Man
« Reply #5 on: October 20, 2007, 05:28:16 PM »
After a lifetime of abandonment, failiure, public humiliation, lonelienes, and poverty, Vince must be in crippiling emotional pain. Hahahahahaha!!!!!
Int. Fed.of Booty Bandits