Author Topic: Which man has better pro potential?  (Read 746 times)

Livewire

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3134
  • I call Nasser.
Which man has better pro potential?
« on: November 16, 2007, 09:59:40 AM »
#1 or #2?

Nasser called Palumbo an acromegalion

kcballer

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4598
  • In you I feel so pretty, In you I taste God
Re: Which man has better pro potential?
« Reply #1 on: November 16, 2007, 10:00:55 AM »
#1 although he's not as dry as #2
Abandon every hope...

Camel Jockey

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16711
  • Mel Gibson and Bob Sly World Domination
Re: Which man has better pro potential?
« Reply #2 on: November 16, 2007, 10:01:01 AM »
Teh first.

Putman's back double bi is horrible.. Not pro worthy.

Jerryme7

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 1534
  • Check out www.muscleshoppe.com for the best prices
Re: Which man has better pro potential?
« Reply #3 on: November 16, 2007, 10:02:37 AM »
#2....

He is more marketable ;)

mar10s

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 663
Re: Which man has better pro potential?
« Reply #4 on: November 16, 2007, 10:11:00 AM »
#1, much smaller forehead, but probably does not have as hot of a wife.

natural al

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6309
  • like it or don't, learn to live with it..whooooooo
Re: Which man has better pro potential?
« Reply #5 on: November 16, 2007, 10:14:25 AM »
Putman's calves, hamstrings and overall leg development are alot better but the other guys upper body is full and looks great.  You can't really judge a show by who "might" make a better pro but by who fullfills the criteria they're looking for.  I'm not a judge but if I was I'd have a hard time judging by those 2 photo's and alot can change in a couple of days-I think those were taken yesturday and prejudging isn't until tomorrow..right?

who would make the better pro....I dunno, to many variables.
nasser=piece of shit