Author Topic: Dorian -three weeks out: 1993  (Read 99564 times)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83178
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Dorian -three weeks out: 1993
« Reply #225 on: November 20, 2007, 04:59:42 PM »
Awesome calves, but way over-developed for his body.  Insane back & hams.  But weak biceps, no chest thickness and shitty quad sweep/separation.  Ronnie at his best BRUTALLY destroys Dorian.

Weak biceps and no chest thickness?  I mean are we watching the same vid? and Ronnie doesn't come close to that never mind ' BRUTALLY destroys ' it Yates has near perfect balance & proportion , he's massive everywhere he looks fantastic from every angle he is for all intents & purposes without flaws sure you can knitpick but he's much more complete and in better condition at that weight than Ronnie at a similar weight



its no contest

figgs

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3925
  • from realization to infinity
Re: Dorian -three weeks out: 1993
« Reply #226 on: November 20, 2007, 05:06:37 PM »
ugh
~

haider

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11978
  • Team Batman Squats
Re: Dorian -three weeks out: 1993
« Reply #227 on: November 20, 2007, 05:14:51 PM »
You're going to comment on someone's mental stability with a name like "anal discharge"?  The irony...
Where the fcvks your buddy DF?
follow the arrows

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83178
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Dorian -three weeks out: 1993
« Reply #228 on: November 20, 2007, 05:19:49 PM »

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Dorian -three weeks out: 1993
« Reply #229 on: November 20, 2007, 05:35:29 PM »
It should be duly noted that any thread regard Dorian or Ronnie or a comparison of the two, will result in a multiple page battle between Hulkster and Dorian.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83178
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Dorian -three weeks out: 1993
« Reply #230 on: November 20, 2007, 05:37:50 PM »
It should be duly noted that any thread regard Dorian or Ronnie or a comparison of the two, will result in a multiple page battle between Hulkster and Dorian.

No battle just Hulkster melting down lol

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Dorian -three weeks out: 1993
« Reply #231 on: November 20, 2007, 07:14:36 PM »
Awesome calves, but way over-developed for his body.  Insane back & hams.  But weak biceps, no chest thickness and shitty quad sweep/separation.  Ronnie at his best BRUTALLY destroys Dorian.

exactly what I have been saying

ND, are you reading this?

 ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

Matt C

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12752
  • The White Vince Goodrum
Re: Dorian -three weeks out: 1993
« Reply #232 on: November 20, 2007, 07:24:04 PM »
I think Dorian's lats look thicker in the front lat spread.
Bodybuilding Pro.com

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Dorian -three weeks out: 1993
« Reply #233 on: November 20, 2007, 07:30:24 PM »
I think Dorian's lats look thicker in the front lat spread.
hard to say. but his front lat spread certainly lacks a lot of detail compared to Ronnie's.

ronnie took dorian's mass and added shape and detail.

he took the sport to the next level.
Flower Boy Ran Away

England_1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2132
Re: Dorian -three weeks out: 1993
« Reply #234 on: November 20, 2007, 07:33:02 PM »
Ronnie looks like utter shit in that picture.
Team Yates

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Dorian -three weeks out: 1993
« Reply #235 on: November 20, 2007, 07:33:09 PM »
hard to say. but his front lat spread certainly lacks a lot of detail compared to Ronnie's.

ronnie took dorian's mass and added shape and detail.

he took the sport to the next level.
Keep telling yourself that.
No one ever comes along and says "Yeah, you're right"
It reminds me of the small child constantly reassuring himself.
You keep saying it to yourself.


Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Dorian -three weeks out: 1993
« Reply #236 on: November 20, 2007, 07:39:53 PM »
Keep telling yourself that.
No one ever comes along and says "Yeah, you're right"
It reminds me of the small child constantly reassuring himself.
You keep saying it to yourself.



lol no one ever says your right?

where the fuck have you been for 1500 pages on the truce thread, not to mention 4 million other threads on other boards like MD, muscle mecca etc. trashing dorian compared to Ronnie..links to all this stuff and quotes have been posted many times. pay attention next time!

dorian vs Ronnie is laughed at by the bb community as it is viewed correctly as not even being close - ronnie by a mile.

 ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

Matt C

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12752
  • The White Vince Goodrum
Re: Dorian -three weeks out: 1993
« Reply #237 on: November 20, 2007, 07:51:54 PM »
hard to say. but his front lat spread certainly lacks a lot of detail compared to Ronnie's.

ronnie took dorian's mass and added shape and detail.

he took the sport to the next level.

His chest and upper body in general (sans the abs) are more detailed than Dorian's in the front lat spread.  I would say Dorian has him on thigh separation, of of course calves.  Overall I would give it to Ronnie in that pose because he looks more tapered than Dorian.
Bodybuilding Pro.com

figgs

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3925
  • from realization to infinity
Re: Dorian -three weeks out: 1993
« Reply #238 on: November 20, 2007, 07:58:39 PM »
Enough is enough. jeeeeeeeeeeezzzz
~

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Dorian -three weeks out: 1993
« Reply #239 on: November 20, 2007, 08:04:04 PM »
thanks Figgs.

we can all see why the bb community laughs at the comparisons.

ronnie kills dorian at his best!

way better shape.

way better cuts.

way better detail

way better vascularity.

equal or better size.

any questions?

its a no brainer validated by millions of pics, videos, expert opinion and eyewitness testimony.

Flower Boy Ran Away

England_1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2132
Re: Dorian -three weeks out: 1993
« Reply #240 on: November 20, 2007, 08:06:55 PM »
thanks Figgs.

we can all see why the bb community laughs at the comparisons.

ronnie kills dorian at his best!

way better shape.

way better cuts.

way better detail

way better vascularity.

equal or better size.

any questions?

its a no brainer validated by millions of pics, videos, expert opinion and eyewitness testimony.



holy cow thats insane . i was at the 03 O and I'm a huge ronnie fan but even he cant touch this , yates arms are huge and his calves mindblowing ! no way could big ron touch him.
Team Yates

England_1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2132
Re: Dorian -three weeks out: 1993
« Reply #241 on: November 20, 2007, 08:07:45 PM »
Hulkster, I'm not a fan of Ronnie's and Dorian's physiques, even if I own a couple of DVDS from each one, so I do have a totally unbiased opinion. To tell the truth, Dorian is far more impressive in that clip than Ronnie in "The Unbelievable"; minus the biceps, which are simply light years ahead on Coleman, Dorian owns Ronnie on every bodypart. Look at those calves, look at those tris, look how dry yet dense Dorian's muscles are; he's just way more complete than Ronnie ever was. I'm speaking of 1993 of course, after that year Dorian shouldn't have won any Mr O IMO. Ronnie may be the freakiest bodybuilder to ever enter a stage, but Dorian in that particular clip is just amazing.
Team Yates

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Dorian -three weeks out: 1993
« Reply #242 on: November 20, 2007, 08:17:22 PM »
England_1, why do you keep posting such a stupid quote?

that contains priceless gems like this:

Quote
Dorian owns Ronnie on every bodypart

 ::)

Flower Boy Ran Away

England_1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2132
Re: Dorian -three weeks out: 1993
« Reply #243 on: November 20, 2007, 08:21:48 PM »
England_1, why do you keep posting such a stupid quote?

that contains priceless gems like this:

 ::)



It's only stupid because it makes you out to be the fool that you truly are  ;)

Your stupidity is simply mind boggling and proves how little you know about BB'ing. Not only have you never even seen these pros in person, you also claimed that Yates lost the 93 olympia to Flex. WTF? How fucking stupid are you? Flex himself says Yates is untouchable, yet all-knowing Hulkster says Yates should have lost  ::) Several posters have noted, specifically the poster who was at the 01asc and 93O, that Yates was superior. That holds a hell of a lot more credence than you have. You were probably still shitting your diapers in 1993. Go fuck Coleman in the ass.

Team Yates

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Dorian -three weeks out: 1993
« Reply #244 on: November 20, 2007, 08:34:00 PM »
lol no one ever says your right?

where the fuck have you been for 1500 pages on the truce thread, not to mention 4 million other threads on other boards like MD, muscle mecca etc. trashing dorian compared to Ronnie..links to all this stuff and quotes have been posted many times. pay attention next time!

dorian vs Ronnie is laughed at by the bb community as it is viewed correctly as not even being close - ronnie by a mile.

 ::)

 Yep.
Keep telling yourself that.
He who protests the loudest......

figgs

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3925
  • from realization to infinity
Re: Dorian -three weeks out: 1993
« Reply #245 on: November 20, 2007, 08:34:24 PM »
This can't be all that complicated. Dorian has better calves (quite possibly the biggest in human history), abs, and okok and a slightly better back (more width, sharper xmas tree, middle back thickness.). That's it!! Delts, pecs, traps, arms and thighs are no comparison. Simply none whatsoever. Dorian has better shaped tris but they aren't nearly the same size as Ronnie's. Plus Ronnie is way stronger so his muscles are more functionable.
~

figgs

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3925
  • from realization to infinity
Re: Dorian -three weeks out: 1993
« Reply #246 on: November 20, 2007, 08:37:26 PM »
It's over!! YAY!
~

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Dorian -three weeks out: 1993
« Reply #247 on: November 20, 2007, 08:39:19 PM »
This can't be all that complicated. Dorian has better calves (quite possibly the biggest in human history), abs, and okok and a slightly better back (more width, sharper xmas tree, middle back thickness.). That's it!! Delts, pecs, traps, arms and thighs are no comparison. Simply none whatsoever. Dorian has more detailed triceps but they aren't nearly the same size as Ronnie's. Plus Ronnie is way stronger so his muscles are more functionable.
Errr,,, wrong mr mentzer.
Your trying to add up bodyparts to make a whole.
You cant do that.
Ronnie is incomplete and not balanced... his bi's overpower his whole arms,.. no calves, fucked up midsection, conditioning suffers at a higher bodyweight.... etc. etc.. need I go on?

figgs

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3925
  • from realization to infinity
Re: Dorian -three weeks out: 1993
« Reply #248 on: November 20, 2007, 08:42:09 PM »
Errr,,, wrong mr mentzer.
Your trying to add up bodyparts to make a whole.
You cant do that.
Ronnie is incomplete and not balanced... his bi's overpower his whole arms,.. no calves, fucked up midsection, conditioning suffers at a higher bodyweight.... etc. etc.. need I go on?

Cut out the calves and Ronnie is more complete. He is better from every angle. Even with Dorian's insane back, Ronnie is more complete because his arms, delts, hams are up to par. Dorian's back, like his calves, are far too big for the rest of him. Truth is, minus those 2 muscles, he's nothing special. Yet Ronnie has phenominal everything but calves.
~

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Dorian -three weeks out: 1993
« Reply #249 on: November 20, 2007, 08:50:28 PM »
  It's spelled "impostor" you dumbass. It is amazing that this fag has the courage to try to give lectures on English to people... :-X

SUCKMYMUSCLE

I guess you're dumber than I thought. It's spelled two ways.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/imposture