In the 90's? Dorian - 6, Haney - 2, Coleman - 2. Dorian wins.
Yes, and that would mean that Jay Cutler is best bodybuilder as of today?
No, in the 2000's, Coleman is clearly the best. Cutler is a placeholder until Heath gets big enough to be Mr. O.
If you think Jay deserved the 2007 Mr. O you are delusional.
When did I ever say Cutler deserved the win? Wolf should have won.
Exactly - so you've now moved away from the logic that winning Sandows means you look better, which you implied when saying that Dorian > Nasser, Haney or Coleman in the 90's because he won more Mr. O titles than them.
Haney was the best bodybuilder of the 80's, Dorian in the 90's, and Coleman in the '00's.If you disagree, you're wrong.Hope this helps!
i dont remember 95, 96 nasser came last as he failed the drug test, even before that he was in 3rd behind shawn ray, 97...yep he won that one
Your opinion is now irrelevant because the logic of your own posts are inconsistent with each other.
Blow me, bookworm!
Jay Cutler failed a drug test similarly in I can't remember which year (Huge Nasser describes it in one of his recent interviews) however he did not lose his placing.
he wouldnt because he was the "great white hope" and probably planned to be mr olympia many years previous to his actual winning
Who would you choose as being the best bodybuilder of the 90's of the following bodybuilding greats:1) Nasser El Sonbaty2) Nasser El Sonbaty3) Nasser El Sonbaty4) Nasser El Sonbaty5) Nasser El SonbatyI'd have to go with Nasser.
Jay cutler failed a diuretic test in 2001. But it was later found that using that amount of drugs would have been impossible and he would have died.. He admitted to using diuretics but not the amount of what he failed the test for.... why did nasser fail his drug test?And even before the whole topic of nasser using oil he still didn't place anywhere dorian, therefore was not in his league.
Nope. From http://www.bodybuildingpro.com/probodybuildingweekly020507.html"Bob Cicherillo brought up Nasser's disqualification at the 1996 Mr. Olympia for diuretics, and Nasser explained that Jay Cutler also tested positive for diuretics at the 2001 Mr. Olympia but Jay had threatened the NPC because the testing company was not IOC regulated as they said it would be, and the NPC backed down and Jay was not disqualified. The end result was that Jay kept his placing and his prize money and Nasser did not."
IFBB TRYING TO HOLD THE GYPSY MAN DOWN!
i understand that, but the charges that the ifbb were charges jay cutler over were on numerous amounts of diuretics, which if he did in fact take he would have died. There is no way that taking those amounts of drugs (THE AMOUNTS HE GOT ACCUSED OF) that anyone would have survived. Therefor jay threatned a lawsuit because the allogations were clearly not true. In the end the ifbb droped the charges and jay kept his prize money. i'm not saying its right im just telling you the facts.
Not quite.
So why didnt the IFBB just reduce the previously exaggerated-dosage accusation to a more reasonable figure and still press with their diurectic charge against Jay?
surely if a drug is banned its banned amounts dont matter