Again don't make claims I have a gimmick account
you should be ashamed that the only people dumb enough to side with you have to resort to that sort of thing because they know that without gimmick accounts, you guys have, oh, about 4 people agreeing with you and thats it.LOL
The mystery of the vanishing biceps..
hey maybe he should have taken a page for Nasser's book and just injected the missing biceps
Can't prove whether had oil in his arms in 96. They look fine to me and just about everyone else with common sense.Dorian is getting owned, just be a man and admit it.
No that was Nasser who got owned and maybe that was set him off on the synthol trend
Nasser and doz are close in 96. nas looks better in some areas, same with doz. its just nassers lats and posing (possibly) that let him down.
Nasser also had some funky shit with his hamstrings where one ham always looked more "ripped" the other even in relaxed poses. His forearms weren't that great either.Nasser was great in his prime but by competing too long he kind of ruined it.
If by owned you mean cheated, then yes.Flex got away with synthol, along with calf implants and later Ruhl and others. Nasser looked oil free in his prime and was cheated.
Maybe he didn't have any snythol in 96/97 but he also didn't have a back , I hope this helps.
Oh brother.. His lats were as wide as Yates' lats and all he really lacked was some lower back detail.
Nasser didn't even beat Shawn let alone Dorian. Nasser was never really in the running. Half his physique was rubbish.
by the way, nasser failed the drug test for the 96 olympia.so, it really doesnt matter how he looked.
lol so was dorian's relative to his back.he was nothing special from the front:
Bullshit. You would be humiliated if you claimed that after attending the 93 or 95 Olympia
perhaps I should rephrase it:Dorian was nothing special from the front relative to a peak Ronnie Coleman.there.