Nasser El Sonbaty - Threads merged

[bigbobs]

Doubt it

Ron at 305

What's that you said?

[bigbobs]

ronnie is owning nasser there it isnt even funny

Are those pics from the 98 Mr. O?  If  I remember correctly Nasser was only 264 that show which the smallest he's ever stepped onstage at from 95 to probably his last show.  He's also not getting "owned."  In the relaxed pose he's hanging in with Ronnie, and the second picture is not an actual comparison becuase they're not standing in the same pose.  However, at 280+ Nasser could hang with Ronnie at 280+

[NarcissisticDeity]

Are those pics from the 98 Mr. O?  If  I remember correctly Nasser was only 264 that show which the smallest he's ever stepped onstage at from 95 to probably his last show.  He's also not getting "owned."  In the relaxed pose he's hanging in with Ronnie, and the second picture is not an actual comparison becuase they're not standing in the same pose.  However, at 280+ Nasser could hang with Ronnie at 280+

Those are from the 199 Mr Olympia and Nasser at his best could hang with ANYONE from the front , the sides and back are his problems

[bigbobs]

Those are from the 199 Mr Olympia and Nasser at his best could hang with ANYONE from the front , the sides and back are his problems

Thanks for clarifying.  Comparing Nasser in 99 at his smallest to Ronnie is like comparing a mid-nineties Ronnie to Nasser.  Nasser peaked before Ronnie, so its hard to find comparisons at their best, however from looking at each of their pics at their best I would say they were pretty comparable.  The only part that Ronnie would distinctly beat Nasser on would be back detail (not even back size).  Nasser would beat Ronnie in abs and calves.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Thanks for clarifying.  Comparing Nasser in 99 at his smallest to Ronnie is like comparing a mid-nineties Ronnie to Nasser.  Nasser peaked before Ronnie, so its hard to find comparisons at their best, however from looking at each of their pics at their best I would say they were pretty comparable.  The only part that Ronnie would distinctly beat Nasser on would be back detail (not even back size).  Nasser would beat Ronnie in abs and calves.

This is 1998

[bigbobs]

Huge Nasser made me look smaller than Ronnie did  

[bigbobs]

This is 1998

Thanks for sharing, but what's your conclusion on that pic?  I think Ronnie has more back detail but looks smaller than Nasser there.

[gh15]

Does it really matter if Nasser or any other pro uses synthol? C'mon, name one, just one top pro who obeys the actual, written rules on banned substances??
The rules on drugs and banned substances has NEVER been followed so who cares.

everyone obey the rules,,1 amp testoviron a day 1200mg a week nandrolone,,seros,,40 units insulin ,,lttiel anabols pinkies at 50+mg a day,,,looks pretty clean to me we only consider not natural in ifbb if there is a site injects in the 1000s of mg a week and seos,,all the rests are natural or use 100 mg prop once evry 5 days and maybe 1 tab dianabol 5mg every 2 days,,we are all NATURAL the sources get to be billioners from some 1 million stupid house wives

[NarcissisticDeity]

Thanks for sharing, but what's your conclusion on that pic?  I think Ronnie has more back detail but looks smaller than Nasser there.

He is smaller than Nasser Ronnie was about 247 pounds in that contest Nasser was a lot bigger , but conditioning wise Ronnie is in much better condition

[Camel Jockey]

1997 Nasser would have beaten 98 Ronnie..

1997 Nasser would have difficulty beating 2003 Ronnie.

[the choad]

comparing Ronnie with Nasser is just insane, and a worthless argument..

[webcake]

Does it really matter if Nasser or any other pro uses synthol? C'mon, name one, just one top pro who obeys the actual, written rules on banned substances??
The rules on drugs and banned substances has NEVER been followed so who cares.

Howie, the point im trying to make is (1) Nasser used synthol obviously, now he denies it. and (2) he says 95% of pro bb'ers are using synthol, which isn't true. A lot of bb'ers aren't using synthol. I'd say there are more bb'ers who don't use synthol than there are who do use it. Again, i got no problem with Nasser using synthol , i just don't like people who are hypocritical and make up BS stats and figures.

[NarcissisticDeity]

1997 Nasser would have beaten 98 Ronnie..

1997 Nasser would have difficulty beating 2003 Ronnie.

No Nasser was going to beat Ronnie again Nasser would be very comparable in the front to anyone but again his major flaw was from the back and Ronnie's back is one of the best ever he could never make up for this liability , if he was facing someone like Jay who's back isn't world class he could but Ronnie no way.

[gh15]

Howie, the point im trying to make is (1) Nasser used synthol obviously, now he denies it. and (2) he says 95% of pro bb'ers are using synthol, which isn't true. A lot of bb'ers aren't using synthol. I'd say there are more bb'ers who don't use synthol than there are who do use it. Again, i got no problem with Nasser using synthol , i just don't like people who are hypocritical and make up BS stats and figures.

ill be damed if wnat you consider a 8 week cycle for you doesnt go in many professional in one single week,,your whole 8 week cycle and then some!

[bigbobs]

comparing Ronnie with Nasser is just insane, and a worthless argument..

Still hurt over your ownage in this thread? http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=188131.0

[NarcissisticDeity]

comparing Ronnie with Nasser is just insane, and a worthless argument..

No it's not he compares very favorably from the front with anyone , Nasser's ab-thigh crushed anything Ronnie ever shown in his whole career , his front double biceps is fantastic , same with his most muscular

[Livewire]

ill be damed if wnat you consider a 8 week cycle for you doesnt go in many professional in one single week,,your whole 8 week cycle and then some!

thansk nasser.

[bigbobs]

he says 95% of pro bb'ers are using synthol, which isn't true. A lot of bb'ers aren't using synthol. I'd say there are more bb'ers who don't use synthol than there are who do use it.

And where are you getting these "facts" from "webcke_112"? 

[Camel Jockey]

comparing Ronnie with Nasser is just insane, and a worthless argument..

Depends on the time frame.

Even ND agrees to a degree.. hahahah

Nasser, along with Dillet and Dorian, was one of the first mass monsters that are so common place these days. And Nasser, along with Dorian, had superb conditioning, far better than anything you see today.

285 at like 5'11" was insane in 1997. Nasser was at his best, and it can be argued that he could have beaten almost anybody.

[bigbobs]

Nasser is simply amazing!

[NarcissisticDeity]

Depends on the time frame.

Even ND agrees to a degree.. hahahah

Nasser, along with Dillet and Dorian, was one of the first mass monsters that are so common place these days. And Nasser, along with Dorian, had superb conditioning, far better than anything you see today.

285 at like 5'11" was insane in 1997. Nasser was at his best, and it can be argued that he could have beaten almost anybody.

He was 270 pounds in 1997 !

[NarcissisticDeity]

98 Olympia

[dearth]

1997 Nasser would have beaten 98 Ronnie..

1997 Nasser would have difficulty beating 2003 Ronnie.

forget nasser
98 Ronnie would have wiped the floor with the 2003 bloated 40" waist version.

[bigbobs]

forget nasser
98 Ronnie would have wiped the floor with the 2003 bloated 40" waist version.

And Nasser 95 to 2002 would wipe the floor with Ronnie Coleman any year before 98.

[Camel Jockey]

And Nasser 95 to 2002 would wipe the floor with Ronnie Coleman any year before 98.

so true.. hahaha nasser owned ronnie for half a decade and more.