He wants to lead the free world.
When asked this AM about the new report, he had no clue.
31 hours after the big breaking news conference.
Is this likely? No. It's likely he didn't want to comment and hurt Bush, or his own chances with the Bush base. That means it's likely that the Baptist minister lied to us.
Either he's lying, or he goes 31 hours without noticing the biggest news story of the month involving our current president, our biggest world threat, etc.
Did no one on his staff read the paper? Does he not look at any morning papers?