Author Topic: 2006 Coleman arm shot  (Read 6429 times)

England_1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2132
2006 Coleman arm shot
« on: December 09, 2007, 04:37:00 PM »
Will anyone ever have freakier arms than Coleman did? Eventhough his physique fell apart over the years, his arms just kept getting freakier. Unreal genetics.

Team Yates

The Squadfather

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25840
Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
« Reply #1 on: December 09, 2007, 04:39:01 PM »
pretty crazy, that's what bodybuilding should be.

Tigerman

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 658
Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
« Reply #2 on: December 09, 2007, 04:39:25 PM »
Peace for small forearms  ;)

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40808
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
« Reply #3 on: December 09, 2007, 04:40:57 PM »
gawd damn...thats nice.
7

Camel Jockey

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16711
  • Mel Gibson and Bob Sly World Domination
Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
« Reply #4 on: December 09, 2007, 04:41:34 PM »
Hi bicep peaks are unreal.

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9899
Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
« Reply #5 on: December 09, 2007, 04:42:22 PM »
Peace for small forearms  ;)

you think his forarms are small there? lol

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
« Reply #6 on: December 09, 2007, 04:43:29 PM »
Quote
Will anyone ever have freakier arms than Coleman did?

not likely, and if so, not for a long time.
Flower Boy Ran Away

Croatch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8025
  • Man up, train natural.
Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
« Reply #7 on: December 09, 2007, 04:43:41 PM »

Cutler is way more vascular. ::)
It also appears that Jay has gone the synthol route, while Ronnie is just a straight up freak.  Not like it isn't working for Cutler though.
N

England_1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2132
Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
« Reply #8 on: December 09, 2007, 04:46:49 PM »
not likely, and if so, not for a long time.

I don't know.....McGrath is right there. He has better vascularity than Coleman and bigger forearms. Coleman has more upper arm size and better peaks. Apples and oranges I guess, both awesome.


Team Yates

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
« Reply #9 on: December 09, 2007, 04:47:27 PM »
all I see is a yellow frog.
Flower Boy Ran Away

Rudee

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6088
Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
« Reply #10 on: December 09, 2007, 04:47:41 PM »
pretty crazy, that's what bodybuilding should be.


Minus the pregnant belly.

The Squadfather

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25840
Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
« Reply #11 on: December 09, 2007, 04:49:34 PM »

Minus the pregnant belly.
hahahaha, it makes me laugh how guys expect these guys to have 23 inch arms, 60 inch chest and 36 inch legs and have a 28 inch waist like a bantamweight competitor. ::)

England_1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2132
Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
« Reply #12 on: December 09, 2007, 04:50:09 PM »
all I see is a yellow frog.

do you see it now?
Team Yates

SS

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9610
  • The new and improved SS.
Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
« Reply #13 on: December 09, 2007, 04:51:51 PM »
How big do you think his arms is in that pic? 22''?

The Squadfather

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25840
Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
« Reply #14 on: December 09, 2007, 04:52:15 PM »
How big do you think his arms is in that pic? 22''?
yep probably right at 22".

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
« Reply #15 on: December 09, 2007, 04:56:47 PM »
I see the pic now.
Flower Boy Ran Away

Cap

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6366
  • Trueprotein.com 5% discount code= CSP111
Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
« Reply #16 on: December 09, 2007, 06:01:31 PM »
hahahaha, it makes me laugh how guys expect these guys to have 23 inch arms, 60 inch chest and 36 inch legs and have a 28 inch waist like a bantamweight competitor. ::)
Arnold had a 58 inch chest, 21-22 inch arms, 28 inch quads, and a 33 or 34 inch waist.  ;)

Coleman does look like he has a pumpkin in his stomach.
Squishy face retard

affy

  • Guest
Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
« Reply #17 on: December 09, 2007, 06:13:43 PM »
Arnold had a 58 inch chest, 21-22 inch arms, 28 inch quads, and a 33 or 34 inch waist.  ;)

Coleman does look like he has a pumpkin in his stomach.
arnold was a god though, and i highly doubt his arms were 21-22 inches..and there was no slin and GH back then

he had a pretty wide waist...he was a master at hiding his flaws

heres a shot that shows just how wide it was


Cap

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6366
  • Trueprotein.com 5% discount code= CSP111
Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
« Reply #18 on: December 09, 2007, 06:23:47 PM »
arnold was a god though, and i highly doubt his arms were 21-22 inches..and there was no slin and GH back then

he had a pretty wide waist...he was a master at hiding his flaws

heres a shot that shows just how wide it was


I'd give him 21.  His waist was wide but Ronnie's was wide and distended as hell.  So bodybuilding has progressed into bigger legs, guts, smaller chests and bigger delts.
Squishy face retard

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
« Reply #19 on: December 09, 2007, 06:33:29 PM »
no one knows for sure what ronnie's arms measure (except for ronnie himself) but one thing is for sure:

whether he was 257 or 297 his arms were freaking massive: :o
Flower Boy Ran Away

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
« Reply #20 on: December 09, 2007, 06:36:10 PM »
Great pic England_1.  When I first saw Coleman in the title and England_1 as the thread starter I was positive it would be something sarcastic towards Coleman and a comparison to Dorian  ;D  Good to know that you give respect where it's due.

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
« Reply #21 on: December 09, 2007, 06:38:54 PM »
England 1 (aka Pubes) has gone on record before saying Coleman was the greatest ever.

so we do know he can give credit where credit is due.
Flower Boy Ran Away

Matt C

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12752
  • The White Vince Goodrum
Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
« Reply #22 on: December 09, 2007, 06:39:18 PM »
Bodybuilding Pro.com

The_Leafy_Bug

  • Guest
Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
« Reply #23 on: December 09, 2007, 06:47:06 PM »
no one knows for sure what ronnie's arms measure (except for ronnie himself) but one thing is for sure:

whether he was 257 or 297 his arms were freaking massive: :o




England_1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2132
Re: 2006 Coleman arm shot
« Reply #24 on: December 09, 2007, 06:52:46 PM »
England 1 (aka Pubes) has gone on record before saying Coleman was the greatest ever.

so we do know he can give credit where credit is due.

First off, who the fuck is pubes? Secondly, I would never say Yates was inferior to anyone at his best. Never.

Team Yates