Author Topic: Transgender Woman Sues Catholic Hospital for Refusing Breast Augmentation Surg  (Read 954 times)

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Interesting issue.  I'm surprised California doesn't have an exception in its antidiscrimination laws for religious institutions.  Sounds unconstitutional to me.  

And to quote Austin Powers, she does look rather mannish.   :)


Transgender Woman Sues Catholic Hospital for Refusing Breast Augmentation Surgery
Friday, January 18, 2008

By Melissa Underwood




Charlene Hastings
A transgender woman in California has gone to court, claiming that a Catholic-affiliated hospital discriminated against her when it denied her request for breast augmentation surgery.

The man-turned-woman, Charlene Hastings, filed the complaint in December and said she wants to have the surgery because it will make her look more feminine, but the hospital has refused to operate because she was not born a woman.

Hastings, who already has had one major sex-change surgery, claims that Seton Medical Center in Daly City, Calif., would not allow her plastic surgeon to operate on a transgender person.

"I honestly believe that God has plans for me to have this surgery," Hastings told FOXNews.com.

"I felt simply less than equal," she said. "Here I am, a woman. I had the reassignment surgery, and not to allow me this right, I felt violated."

Hastings, who was raised Catholic and says she attends church every Sunday, said the hospital told her that the surgery was not part of God's plan for her.

She filed the complaint in San Francisco Superior Court alleging harassment and discrimination on the basis of gender.

"She feels as if she's been treated as if she has no rights," said her attorney, Christopher Dolan.

The complaint alleges that Hastings suffered "shock, embarrassment, intimidation, physical distress and injury, humiliation, fear, stress and other damages." She is seeking unspecified monetary damages.

Click here to read the complaint. (pdf)

Hastings completed gender reassignment surgery in fall 2006 to become female at another hospital. Shortly after, she requested the breast augmentation surgery be performed at Seton Medical Center because her surgeon was affiliated with the hospital. The hospital denied her request and an official told her that "God made you a man," according to the complaint.

"Hastings said that they would not allow her to receive the services because they felt that she was born a man, so they would not assist her in this procedure that they offer," Dolan said.

Hastings said she doesn't plan to seek the surgery elsewhere because of her fear of being denied again.

Seton Medical Center, a member of the Daughters of Charity Health System — a regional health care system of five hospitals — is not commenting on the lawsuit.

But system spokeswoman Elizabeth Nikels said in a written statement that the organization follows hospital policy according to Catholic teaching: "Vincentian and Catholic values form the basis of our identity and set the parameters for our ethics and standards of behavior in health care."

The Catholic hospital does not allow transgender surgery, the statement says.

"Seton Medical Center, a Catholic hospital and a member of the Daughters of Charity Health System, provides services to all individuals. However, the hospital does not perform surgical procedures contrary to Catholic teaching; for example, abortion, direct euthanasia, transgender surgery or any of its related components."

Shannon Minter, legal director for the Center for Lesbian Rights and an expert on transgender rights, said California law protects Hastings.

"It's against California law, and it's wrong," Minter said. "They should be ashamed of themselves for turning away anybody because of their identity."

Minter said the Unruh Civil Rights Act protects Hastings against discrimination based on gender identity, adding that there is no exception for religious-affiliated businesses.

The act "provides protection from discrimination by all business establishments in California, including housing and public accommodations, because of age, ancestry, color, disability, national origin, race, religion, sex and sexual orientation."

The Catholic League, the nation's largest Catholic civil rights organization, supports the hospital's position.

"Catholic hospitals are not required to perform abortions, and neither should they be forced to perform transgender operations," said Catholic League President Bill Donohue.

Anita Silvers, a professor at San Francisco State University, said a hospital can determine what elective surgery can be done at its facility and can refuse to do transgender surgery if it’s too risky, the facility isn’t equipped to do it or the hospital doesn’t have enough resources.

Silvers said the case will test the Unruh Act and determine if the issue is about not allowing the surgery to Hastings based on other factors at the facility, or if the refusal is about Hastings alone.

"The Unruh Act created transgendered people as a protected class who cannot be refused service based on their being transgendered," Silvers wrote in an e-mail. "The issue is whether the refusal is about the surgery itself or about the patient herself."

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,323791,00.html

Hedgehog

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19466
  • It Rubs The Lotion On Its Skin.
She's operated into a woman.

They have no case of refusing.

As empty as paradise

24KT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24455
  • Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244
Hope she wins.
w

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
She's operated into a woman.

They have no case of refusing.



Sure they do.  It's an elective procedure, the hospital is a private entity, and they have religious objections.  I think the California law is flawed.  There should be an exemption for religions institutions.  We have one here. 

24KT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24455
  • Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244
Sure they do.  It's an elective procedure, the hospital is a private entity, and they have religious objections.  I think the California law is flawed.  There should be an exemption for religions institutions.  We have one here. 

The hospital is NOT a religious institution, it is a medical one. It is also subject to the laws of the state of Cali.

I have a problem with a hospital telling someone a surgery is not part of God's plan for their life.
If s/he had presented themselves with a cancerous tumour, would they say "God gave you the cancer, therefore we don't think that surgery, radiation, and chemo is part of God's plan for your life". I have a real problem with people making such judgement calls for other people. If they want to be licensed by the state or accept public monies, they are subject to the laws of the land, ...and those laws supercede their "religious bigotries".
w

gcb

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2283
  • you suffer, why?
Could they refuse to give an operation for a nose job?

If the answer is no then I don't really see what the difference is - it is cosmetic after all.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
The hospital is NOT a religious institution, it is a medical one. It is also subject to the laws of the state of Cali.

I have a problem with a hospital telling someone a surgery is not part of God's plan for their life.
If s/he had presented themselves with a cancerous tumour, would they say "God gave you the cancer, therefore we don't think that surgery, radiation, and chemo is part of God's plan for your life". I have a real problem with people making such judgement calls for other people. If they want to be licensed by the state or accept public monies, they are subject to the laws of the land, ...and those laws supercede their "religious bigotries".

Did you read the article? 

"Seton Medical Center, a Catholic hospital and a member of the Daughters of Charity Health System, provides services to all individuals. However, the hospital does not perform surgical procedures contrary to Catholic teaching; for example, abortion, direct euthanasia, transgender surgery or any of its related components."

A private religious institution should be permitted to practice their private business consistent with its religious convictions.  A person who wants an elective procedure can simply find another hospital.  The law usually accommodates religious institutions, like the following exception to our state employment anti-discrimination laws in Hawaii:

Nothing in this part shall be deemed to:

. . .
(5)  Prohibit or prevent any religious or denominational institution or organization, or any organization operated for charitable or educational purposes, that is operated, supervised, or controlled by or in connection with a religious organization, from giving preference to individuals of the same religion or denomination or from making a selection calculated to promote the religious principles for which the organization is established or maintained;


http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol07_Ch0346-0398/HRS0378/HRS_0378-0003.htm

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Could they refuse to give an operation for a nose job?

If the answer is no then I don't really see what the difference is - it is cosmetic after all.

I don't see a difference.

No one should have the right to force a hospital to perform an elective procedure, particularly when the procedure violates the hospital's religious affiliated policies.