Author Topic: New York Times on Atwood bust (Read 3254 times)

musclecenter · « **on:** January 26, 2008, 07:43:46 PM »

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/27/sports/27steroids.html
Officials Make Deals to Learn Who Made Drug Deals
By MICHAEL BRICK
Published: January 27, 2008

.......When Arthur Atwood was arrested, he wasn’t charged with a drug violation because of a continuing federal investigation..........

Sumpa · « **Reply #1 on:** January 26, 2008, 07:48:49 PM »

Exctasy, huh. More proof of the connection between bb and rec. drugs.

HTexan · « **Reply #2 on:** January 26, 2008, 07:49:03 PM »

Quote from: musclecenter on January 26, 2008, 07:43:46 PM

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/27/sports/27steroids.html
Officials Make Deals to Learn Who Made Drug Deals
By MICHAEL BRICK
Published: January 27, 2008

.......When Arthur Atwood was arrested, he wasn’t charged with a drug violation because of a continuing federal investigation..........

so he is talking. LOL

columbusdude82 · « **Reply #3 on:** January 26, 2008, 07:52:24 PM »

This is BS...

bigdumbbell · « **Reply #4 on:** January 26, 2008, 07:53:26 PM »

Quote from: HTexan on January 26, 2008, 07:49:03 PM

so he is talking. LOL

it said his chest was 61"

HTexan · « **Reply #5 on:** January 26, 2008, 07:56:45 PM »

lol still i bet some people are going to be looking for him, because he sold them some fake roids make from vegetable oil.

YoungBlood · « **Reply #6 on:** January 26, 2008, 08:06:24 PM »

And just like 90% of the other arrests in the BBing community, there was an attempt to cover this one up.
But the truth eventually came out; just like in Victor's case, and the others that have happened in the past....

bigdumbbell · « **Reply #7 on:** January 26, 2008, 08:12:15 PM »

who is the other dude mentioned in the article...it said he reads the bible and deals drugs

JohnnyVegas · « **Reply #8 on:** January 26, 2008, 08:35:53 PM »

One of them, David C. Jacobs, 35, known to friends as Bulletproof, publicly boasted of having evidence to link players for the Dallas Cowboys and the Atlanta Falcons to steroids.

LOL......Bulletproof.

What kind of dork comes up with a name like that>?

musclecenter · « **Reply #9 on:** January 26, 2008, 10:07:01 PM »

Atwood's wheels !

aussiepro · « **Reply #10 on:** January 26, 2008, 10:10:05 PM »

i cant even remember the last time he competed.. (it may have been recently but he he obvously didn't place well).. he is as big as a house but no symmetry what so ever

musclecenter · « **Reply #11 on:** January 26, 2008, 10:14:42 PM »

Quote from: aussiepro on January 26, 2008, 10:10:05 PM

i cant even remember the last time he competed.. (it may have been recently but he he obvously didn't place well).. he is as big as a house but no symmetry what so ever

2006
Atlantic City Pro - IFBB, 10th
Europa Supershow - IFBB, 5th
Montreal Pro Championships - IFBB, 7th

arce377 · « **Reply #12 on:** January 26, 2008, 11:49:34 PM »

Damn...

HTexan · « **Reply #13 on:** January 27, 2008, 12:17:43 AM »

Quote from: JohnnyVegas on January 26, 2008, 08:35:53 PM

LOL......Bulletproof.

What kind of dork comes up with a name like that>?

240 is Back · « **Reply #14 on:** January 27, 2008, 12:32:56 AM »

Is he doing the Ironman this year?

Blockhead · « **Reply #15 on:** January 27, 2008, 01:12:45 AM »

I give it 2 months and he will be signed with MD.

They still owe Atwood $$$, you know.

musclecenter · « **Reply #16 on:** January 27, 2008, 01:35:57 AM »

2006 Europa Supershow ( 5th) pics

James Blunt · « **Reply #17 on:** January 27, 2008, 01:45:16 AM »

thank you musclecenter for the thread, great as usual =)

I remember an artice on Atwood saying he was trying to get his arms to 24 inches tt match the rest of his physique. That's the last I heard of Atwood.

Matt C · « **Reply #18 on:** January 27, 2008, 01:50:37 AM »

Quote from: Sumpa on January 26, 2008, 07:48:49 PM

Exctasy, huh. More proof of the connection between bb and rec. drugs.

Drugs are everywhere in life though. $:-\$ I abstain completely, but I feel that moderation is best. I only wish people could follow that basic principle.

Quote from: Sumpa on January 26, 2008, 07:48:49 PM

Prosecutors could have tried Atwood and Jacobs on multiple counts of drug conspiracy

ROFL.

Epic "evidence" against Art if all they could get is a conspiracy charge.

Just an FYI for those who are not aware, narcs are reading this thread. Briefly: I would like to point out that narcs are political pawns intended to keep the inherent risk in the drug trade present so that the end user cost of said drugs will absorb that risk in order to sustain a worldwide economy of one trillion dollars per year. It's unfortunate that they are brainwashed to actually believe they are doing the world good. $:-\$ That is the saddest part of being a soldier though - when you are told what to believe and told that you can't think for yourself. That's what I hated the most!

D_1000 · « **Reply #19 on:** January 27, 2008, 03:20:31 AM »

Quote from: Matt C on January 27, 2008, 01:50:37 AM

Just an FYI for those who are not aware, narcs are reading this thread. Briefly: I would like to point out that narcs are political pawns intended to keep the inherent risk in the drug trade present so that the end user cost of said drugs will absorb that risk in order to sustain a worldwide economy of one trillion dollars per year. It's unfortunate that they are brainwashed to actually believe they are doing the world good.

bigdumbbell · « **Reply #20 on:** January 27, 2008, 03:46:00 AM »

oh ok...we called him pinhead because of his awful disproportion

Matt C · « **Reply #21 on:** January 27, 2008, 04:03:13 AM »

Quote from: D_1000 on January 27, 2008, 03:20:31 AM

Why is it that there are some of you who will criticize everything that I have to say, yet not come back with any rebuttals? After all, if what I'm saying is so inherently false, it should be easy to disprove right?

Do you disagree that narcs are reading this thread and this board? I assure you, they are.

Do you disagree that narcs result in the street value of drugs to increase? I would go so far as to say this is intentional, but while you may disagree with that, I can't see anyone disagreeing with the first part of it.

bigdumbbell · « **Reply #22 on:** January 27, 2008, 04:18:35 AM »

Quote from: Matt C on January 27, 2008, 04:03:13 AM

Why is it that there are some of you who will criticize everything that I have to say, yet not come back with any rebuttals? After all, if what I'm saying is so inherently false, it should be easy to disprove right?

Do you disagree that narcs are reading this thread and this board? I assure you, they are.

Do you disagree that narcs result in the street value of drugs to increase? I would go so far as to say this is intentional, but while you may disagree with that, I can't see anyone disagreeing with the first part of it.

this is america, we can read whatever we want and go wherever we want to

are there narcs reading this? yes maybe. are ther pedofiles freading this? yes maybe.

bigdumbbell · « **Reply #23 on:** January 27, 2008, 04:27:54 AM »

Quote from: musclecenter on January 27, 2008, 04:21:22 AM

haha thanks

Matt C · « **Reply #24 on:** January 27, 2008, 04:42:15 AM »

Quote from: bigdumbbell on January 27, 2008, 04:18:35 AM

this is america, we can read whatever we want and go wherever we want to are there narcs reading this? yes maybe. are ther pedofiles freading this? yes maybe.

Why would pedophiles read this though? I'm not saying I don't, I just wouldn't see the motivation. What I'm saying is that Narcs would be reading getbig as well as other message boards as part of their (useless) investigative work. Hoping to find clues in their investigations which sometimes take over a decade to complete.