i said probably for one, and i would argue. i dont know you so i cant say for certain but most religious people often involve themselves in religious practice.
your beleif is the opposite of objectivity and is irrational since it is faith based. it is the very definition of irrationality, acceptance without sufficient proof. your evidence is subjective ie "ive seen god work in my life" this is firstly an emotional argument and a subjective one with no axioms to prove anything.
dont say your objective, because if you deny arguments against your god. why wont he heal an amputee? since he is so active in your life, working and such? wouldnt that be impressive?
If by "religious practice" you mean attending church, then I plead guilty. About 50 out of 52 weeks of the year. Other than church, the vast majority of my "social network" is non religious.
So a faith-based belief is irrational? How you figure? Are you telling me there are no faith-based beliefs in your life at all?
Seeing the results of my faith has nothing to do with emotion. Yes it's subjective, but all personal experiences are subjective.
I have no idea why God won't grow amputee another limb, nor do I know how a person wound up with this hypothetical missing a limb in the first place.