Haney is one of my top 3 favorite bb's, and I will say that Haney's peak condition will not compare to Coleman at his best. And even if Haney would have taken the same drugs and amounts that Coleman did, he still probably would not match Coleman's totall package around 1998. But we don't really know. Haney's arm would have never matched Coleman's, no matter what drugs he was on.
I am checking some Youtube videos right now and I don't see how nobody was able to beat this guy for 8 years his legs were so fucking small compared to his torso that it looks ridiculousweak arms as well
I'm not sure that his arms are quite as bad as people claim.
Thats because he's a troll
His arms look great. Lee Haney was one of the greatest ever bodybuilders, period. He deserved all his Olympias as he was head and shoulders above the competition. This is why none of the guys how competed against him moan about how they should have won. He won by miles. His physique killed everybody else's. The guy had mass and aesthetics in a way not seen again until Nasser. Coleman was given many gifts : against Flex Wheeler and certainly against Jay Cutler. In fact it's crazy that Flex and Nasser never won the Olypmpia when the disgusting Yates was so weak and his hideous tattooed body was so weak. Now he was given gifts but not Haney, no way. Haney is the only uncontroversial Mr O in all of time. Even Arnold's were questioned by some. Not Haney, the best champion of all time.
I am checking some Youtube videos right now and I don't see how nobody was able to beat this guy for 8 years his legs were so fucking small compared to his torso that it looks ridiculousweak arms as wellSpeak on this mofos, what was so impressive about this guy ?
HAHA Flea Labrada could never win an O. He was way too small and skinny.Yes Nasser and aesthetics. He was the only mass monster to also have beautiful lines and a flowing physique.Stick to fake wrestling as your bodybuilding knowledge is very lacking.
if you don't understand what was so great about Labrada's physique you shouldn't be throwing stones at other posters. No weak bodyparts and everything on him was outstanding.
Nice physique but he was too small. He was all quality and quantity. Haney had both, same with Nasser.With no mass you don't win the O. Read up on it and look at the winners. No mass = no Sandow.Sorry but that is how it is. Haney blowed him away.
Once again, your superior bodybuilding knowledge has served you well. This is evidenced by the 3-year reign of the original mass monster, Frank Zane.
Nasser didn't have "beautiful lines". Up to 1995, he had a good clean look with a tight waist. From 1996 on, his gut was out of hand and his back lost detail with each passing year.
Are you sure about that "Triple-H 2005" ?First pic is 99, second is 97, and third I believe is 97 (or 98)
(stolen off him by the disgusting, fat tattooed former racist Yates)
Great post bobs, as usual. Nasser was superb in all this years this triple H claims he deteriorating. Good enough to win the Arnold and win the Olympia (stolen off him by the disgusting, fat tattooed former racist Yates)
LMFAO Zane is a dinosaur now. that a different time and era. it has been the era of the mass monster and your boy labrada had no mass whatsoever.
Yes, I'm sure. Show him from the back in successive years and you'll see a decrease in back detail. Very slight in 96-99, but quickly downhill after that. And if you post those pics next to his 94-95 pics, you'll see his waist did indeed grow quite a bit.And why the " around my screen name. It's a screen name! Is Bigbobs the given name on your birth certificate?
but Yates DIDN'T have a better side chest than this:
Now post 96, 98 & 99 nest to it like I said.And no, BOB, he isn't beating Dorian.Good job hijacking another thread, BTW.