Nasser's back was weaker than Dorian's, but it certainly wasn't missing.
Dorian has no left arm and here you are saying that he was unbeatable in 95. 
Nasser had better delts, arms, legs, hammies and roughly the same sized calves. You can't seem to understand the fact that other bodyparts count as well.
You're critical of Ronnie's forearms, Nasser's back, yet completely ignore Dorian's ripped up bodyparts.
Nasser's back was weaker than Dorians? LMMFAO wow thanks for admitting the painfully obvious , no shit ! his back sucked period you never be able to escape this , he had width and thats it , his back lacked depth , thickness , separation , development and density that for all intents & purposes is MISSING
Dorian had no left arm
WRONG he had ONE bicep shorter than another his triceps & forearms are still outstanding and you're like Hulkster you think a collection of impressive parts make the better whole it doesn't work that way and just like Hulkster you try to fluff up the advantages
legs, hammies and roughly the same sized calves.legs include ' hammies ' and calves so why list them twice? and Nasser doesn't have better arms he may have better biceps , but triceps aren't better and his forearms certainly aren't
again pay attention Nasser could match or even surpass Dorian from the front , but he could NOT do the same from the sides and from the rear and couple that with Nasser never being as hard or as dry as Dorian ( everywhere ) he was never going to beat Dorian its old news , he's a one dimensional bodybuilder and thats not how the game is played.
