I agreed that Dorian's back is better overall than Nasser's, however I dont think Dorian "looks better from the back" because "the back" poses contain many other bodyparts too. I agree dorian's rear lat spread was better than Nasser, but in 97 Nasser's rear double biceps pose looked better - and thats not just my opinion but many getbiggers who were discussing it a week or so ago as you would remember. I havent seen any rear double biceps comparisons between the two in 95 or 96 to comment, but it woudlnt surprise me if Nasser looked better in those. Flex Wheeler's rear double biceps pose easily beats Yates' and that's why I was questioning why you're using that pic to compare.
You've shown that you have tons of scanned pics from the 90's shows, how come you dont post any comparisons of Nasser and Yates? There was one black and white comparison in the 95 Mr. O coverage in Flex where Nasser was doing a most muscular pose with his head facing downwards and Yates was doing the same pose and it was not even close - please be a man and post that one?
Nasser may look ' better ' in the back double biceps shot but that doesn't mean he has the better back double biceps shot in terms of density & conditioning , detail & separation and size just because he's softer and looks better doesn't mean he should win the shot , bare in mind all rounds are physique rounds they count ALL of the criteria in every single pose from every single angle and while Nasser does have some advantages as a whole Yates satisfied the criteria better
and Flex Wheeler may have a more aesthetic back double biceps shot but he can't touch Yates in this pose at his best Dorian has way to many advantages , size , density , conditioning , balance & proportion , etc more to a pose that just meeting part of the criteria
