· The FBI failed to interview Ft. Detrick anthrax experts for two months into their investigation, doing it only after the experts complained to the press of gross incompetence on the part of the FBI.
That would have been thought out. The same people you say assumed they would control an investigation wouldn't leave that to chance. If someone really had a way of preventing an investigation they would have done so. Either way, you don't bank on "may-be's" if you intent to cover something up. they would have known full well there would be an investigation and have prepared for it well in advance. Pointing out it took them 2 months only conveniently fits into a theory but does not encompass the entire spectrum of pulling something like this off.
The FBI overruled local homicide detectives who think that an anthrax expert was murdered, possibly because he knew too much.
This is speculative becuase we are not privy to the facts of the case. That being an issue, again it fits into the theory, but without knowing ALL the reasons why the FBI ruled it out we only have speculation. Do we have the
actual report from the homicide detectives? What language did they use in their report? I would reserve judgment on what the homocide detectives said until i saw the actual police report they filled and then i'd liek to see the report the FBI filled and the evidence they were both looking at.
Besides i think you may connecting the "9/11 inside job theory" with this as being something they assumed they could get away with.
Don't get me wrong. What you've posted is incomplete. I'm not trying to shoot it down, i'm just pointing out that what you've posted is not very concrete. The best way to find this out for sure is to have some of the things i talked about to review like the actual police reports.