« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 8   Go Down

Author Topic: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?  (Read 18372 times)

Mussolini

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1696
  • riding shotgun on the team Nasser War wagon
Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« on: February 05, 2008, 08:24:30 AM »
1- Ron Harris: Recently admits to mega dosing with almost every bodybuilding drug under the sun for ten years, only to acheive the look of an average guy who works out 3-4 times a week.

2-Sevestase: Was on sustanon for 3 years straight and cycled d-bol and anadrol during that time, maxing out at 170 lbs at 15% bodyfat.

3- Billyguns: no need to explain his track record.


I vote for Harris as not only did he mega dose but he was so dedicated to his diet he would wake up twice a night to refuel with protien.
Logged
shotgun on the team

Blockhead

  • Toms
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 7793
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #1 on: February 05, 2008, 08:27:04 AM »

 King Kamali...aka 'nder98'.

 Billy Gunns doesn't count because it is obvious that the gang in NYC area sold him sterile seasme oil so technically he's never used real gear.
Logged
?

Mussolini

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1696
  • riding shotgun on the team Nasser War wagon
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #2 on: February 05, 2008, 08:29:02 AM »
Yah, knowing who Billyguns' supplier was, he was probably swallowing sugar pills and shooting vegetible oil.


Your right, Kamali should also be nominated, years and years of megadosing and having 17 inch arms after synthol.
Logged
shotgun on the team

G o a t b o y

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 21431
  • Time-Out in Dubai, India with Swampi the Cocksmith
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #3 on: February 05, 2008, 08:30:45 AM »
Sevastase is clearly the winner if he maxed at 170#, 15%.

Billy wasn't on for that long and had no natural base, so although he looks like shit, he doesn't get the title.

Harris' history is pathetic, and he should be shot for stupidity for doing it as he did, but he looks better that either Sevastase or Billy.




Chances are, Sev has been getting fakes all this time over there in Romania..  hell, you could be 170# 15% without even lifting weights, forget gear.
Logged
Ron: "I am lazy."

cht868

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 782
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #4 on: February 05, 2008, 08:33:24 AM »
cause sevestee is on a high protein cum diet, he seems like he sucks a lot of dick and relies on cum as his main protein source ;D
Logged

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #5 on: February 05, 2008, 08:52:35 AM »
kamali..
Logged
choice is an illusion

Stark

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22988
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #6 on: February 05, 2008, 08:54:13 AM »
Ron Harris, by miles, the guy is a fucking disgrace but is the absolute pictureboy for so many
Bodybuilding gym rats on this planet.
Logged

Karl Kox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6863
  • There's no Kayfabe in the business anymore.
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #7 on: February 05, 2008, 09:37:38 AM »
Any bbder with a big waist line.  I see guys all the time who look massive on gear, but they are just big, they don't have A pleasing physique
Logged

Pazuzu

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 284
  • Getbig!
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #8 on: February 05, 2008, 11:01:46 AM »
I vote for me - I have seen 15-year-old anorexic girls with more mass than me. Ants have more mass!

Epic self-owning (did I say that right?)
Logged

DK II

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31269
  • Call me 4 steroids: 571-332-2588 or 571-249-4163
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #9 on: February 05, 2008, 11:06:31 AM »
Quote from: Mussolini on February 05, 2008, 08:24:30 AM
1- Ron Harris: Recently admits to mega dosing with almost every bodybuilding drug under the sun for ten years, only to acheive the look of an average guy who works out 3-4 times a week.

2-Sevestase: Was on sustanon for 3 years straight and cycled d-bol and anadrol during that time, maxing out at 170 lbs at 15% bodyfat.

3- Billyguns: no need to explain his track record.


I vote for Harris as not only did he mega dose but he was so dedicated to his diet he would wake up twice a night to refuel with protien.


2 is the winner.

P.S. love the nickname!
Logged
糞

Pazuzu

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 284
  • Getbig!
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #10 on: February 05, 2008, 11:12:50 AM »
NPC officials even felt so bad for me that even though I weighed in at only 121 pounds at 6-4, they allowed me to compete as a Heavyweight on several occasions. The judges felt so bad that for me I took second place at the New England twice as a HW, and twice at the Massachusetts State too.

And this was with 1,000 mg of Sustanon every hour, 50 tabs of d-bol and Winstrol a day, and 500 mg. of Deca every day.
Logged

Stavios

  • Guest
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #11 on: February 05, 2008, 11:16:13 AM »
Quote from: Mussolini on February 05, 2008, 08:24:30 AM
1- Ron Harris: Recently admits to mega dosing with almost every bodybuilding drug under the sun for ten years, only to acheive the look of an average guy who works out 3-4 times a week.

I must not even look like an average guy then because Ron owns me physique wise  :'(
Logged

SirTraps

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1603
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #12 on: February 05, 2008, 11:20:32 AM »


          Id have to give it to this puny shrimp.  Talk about shitty genetics  ::)
Logged

Go 4 It

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4130
  • "The World Meets Nobody Half Way"
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #13 on: February 05, 2008, 11:22:08 AM »
Quote from: Stavios on February 05, 2008, 11:16:13 AM
I must not even look like an average guy then because Ron owns me physique wise  :'(

You can always buy more skin tight Under Armor gear then him, thats something you still have a chance at beating him at..
Logged
4

columbusdude82

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6896
  • I'm too sexy for my shirt!!!
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #14 on: February 05, 2008, 11:23:32 AM »
Quote from: Pazuzu on February 05, 2008, 11:01:46 AM
I vote for me - I have seen 15-year-old anorexic girls with more mass than me. Ants have more mass!

Epic self-owning (did I say that right?)

Shouldn't you be ghost-writing some pro's MD advice column right about now, instead of wasting time on message boards? ::)

Oh, and as for worst genetics, I know this kid who may not be the very worst but his genetics are damn lousy!!! Says he's been on 750 mg test a week (from some shady UG lab) since JULY 2005!!!!!!! and is 180 lbs at 5'10, only thing that grew was his tits!!!
Logged

MindSpin

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9985
  • MMA > Boxing
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #15 on: February 05, 2008, 11:29:27 AM »
Arvilla hands down.  All heart but zero genetics...
Logged
w

Pazuzu

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 284
  • Getbig!
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #16 on: February 05, 2008, 12:19:35 PM »
That video clip is recent, I hadn't been on gear for almost two years there.

But I do have the worst form and I am the weakest bb in the whole world.

Those dumbbells are actually made of styrofoam. They probably only weigh about a half pound each and I could barely budge them.
Logged

Mussolini

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1696
  • riding shotgun on the team Nasser War wagon
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #17 on: February 05, 2008, 12:19:57 PM »
Quote from: Stavios on February 05, 2008, 11:16:13 AM
I must not even look like an average guy then because Ron owns me physique wise  :'(


Have you been mega dosing for 10+ years like Ron has?
Logged
shotgun on the team

Mussolini

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1696
  • riding shotgun on the team Nasser War wagon
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #18 on: February 05, 2008, 12:23:07 PM »
Quote from: Pazuzu on February 05, 2008, 12:19:35 PM
That video clip is recent, I hadn't been on gear for almost two years there.

But I do have the worst form and I am the weakest bb in the whole world.

Those dumbbells are actually made of styrofoam. They probably only weigh about a half pound each and I could barely budge them.



Ron you have admitted to consuming boatloads of gear over the last 10 years and you dont even break 200 lbs. You have the displine and the work ethic but when god was handing out BB genetics you must have been asleep.

Logged
shotgun on the team

FullROM

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 733
  • GetBig
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #19 on: February 05, 2008, 12:25:03 PM »
Quote from: MindSpin on February 05, 2008, 11:29:27 AM
Arvilla hands down.  All heart but zero genetics...
Logged

Livewire

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3134
  • I call Nasser.
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #20 on: February 05, 2008, 12:26:26 PM »
Quote from: MindSpin on February 05, 2008, 11:29:27 AM
Arvilla hands down.  All heart but zero genetics...

Mindspin,

Do you believe that Arvilla shows heart on Leg Day?

I mean, he has some mean shoulders and biceps, not because of genes, but because he cared abouit those bodyparts.  
Logged
Nasser called Palumbo an acromegalion

Cleanest Natural

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28661
  • Diet first, all else second
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #21 on: February 05, 2008, 12:31:36 PM »
funny shit...Goattail got the facts wrong.....here's me completely clean for over a year dieted down clean without aas at 185....this is the lowest I've ever been.....fact is : I LOOK BETTER CLEAN THAN ALL U BITCHES ON YOUR HEAVY UG LAB CYCLES. SIC ....GOATGIRL IS ANOTHER INTERNET JEALOUS BITCH WHO I'D LIKE TO NAME PRESIDENT OF MY FANCLUB.BY THE WAY : IF ANY OF U BITCHES POST A PIC JUICED OR NOT THAT BEATS ME ALL BOW FOREVA BEFORE U...BUT U ALL KNOW THAT WHEN IT COMES TO WHO LOOKS BETTER i'M MICHAEL JACKSON AND U ARE TITO'S. BIOTCH  ;D
Logged

G o a t b o y

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 21431
  • Time-Out in Dubai, India with Swampi the Cocksmith
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #22 on: February 05, 2008, 12:32:47 PM »
Quote from: Pazuzu on February 05, 2008, 12:19:35 PM
But I do have the worst form and I am the weakest bb in the whole world.

Those dumbbells are actually made of styrofoam. They probably only weigh about a half pound each and I could barely budge them.


Admitting you have a problem is the first step towards recovery.
Logged
Ron: "I am lazy."

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #23 on: February 05, 2008, 12:34:27 PM »
About 50% of getbig members are juicing or have juiced in the past, even though few will admit it.  #1 and #2 above are in better shape than over 50% of getbiggers.  Hope this helps.
Logged

beatmaster

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2819
  • Save a tree, eat a beaver
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #24 on: February 05, 2008, 12:36:23 PM »
Quote from: SirTraps on February 05, 2008, 11:20:32 AM


         

was is he doing, shoulders or chest?
Logged
are you delusional?
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 8   Go Up
« previous next »