Funny how you guys say that Nasser has short legs, as though his legs are like Lee Priest's. Based on the photos you can not even see or say that Nasser's legs are short. They may give the illusion of being short since they are so thick, but that's like seeing Nasser standing at almost 6 feet tall and saying he is only 5'7" because of his thickness. And even if Nasser's legs were one or two inches shorter, aren't Yates his biceps short, his muscles multiple times torn - and we could also establish the thesis that his upper body was shorter than Nasser but still longer than Coleman's - so what does any of that prove?
Yates did not have detail despite "hardness", still torn muscles - unlike ANYONE else in ALL of bodybuilding history to win with such a perfect score sheet!
So, it must be then that Yates was superior to everyone else, even with torn muscles, short upper body, thick waist, tiny arms (a Mr. USA overall champ has better arms!)....just unbeatable. Definately a true nubaine warrior!
Also, if Nasser was "dwarfed by Quinn" and Nasser was bigger than Yates, wouldn't Quinn just "double-dwarf" Yates?
Also, very strange that Quinn, after his return to the IFBB and before he switched over to the IBB from the WBF federation, was NEVER compared to Yates? Hmm, very strange, probably because they did not want Quinn to dwarf Dorian and kill Dorian with his hardness.
At least Quinn and Yates are equal on the nubaine field.