What's the problem here? If attacking/destroying/brutalizing Iraq on the basis of a 'mistake' of fact is okay for the US and Coalition of the Willing--hey, everybody thought they had WMDs--then the ongoing attack of that country should not be a problem. I mean we are there already.
Please, please tell me you're fucking kidding me!!
That argument holds as much water as me raping your sister in a dark alley and then alleging I didn't know it was your sister because it was dark and I couldn't see her face. But hey, since I already had my dick in her pussy... might as well "finish" the job right?
Do you want to cut and run and surrender to the insurgents/Al Qaeda?
Not true! Not true! And... you know what? Just because you keep repeating the same shit does not make it a truth (although in your head it might). AT THIS POINT in time, it is a well known fact that the "foreign insurgency" (the "foreign" also applies to us, by the way) is made up of former Baath party members who want their land back. It is also a well-known fact that they make up 85-90% of the "insurgency" movement, with the remaining 10-15% of the terrorist factions being made up of pissed off Arabs. Al Qaeda's presence is minimal, although we have to keep the story up so that we keep a lifeline for the reason to go to war.
So what if the vast majority of Insurgents are not Al Qaeda but Iraqi citizens attacking the US as an invading force? The fact is, we are there, some Al Qaeda is there, and we must defend ourselves and protect the Iraqi people by killing the Iraqis that are attacking us.
Ok, if 80-85% of Iraqis want you out, why in fucking hell would you want to defend them?! Why?!
We have to finish the job. The best way to finish the job is to eliminate the threat posed by the Sunnis/Insurgents/Al Qaeda.
I believe you're referring to concentration camps and the like... I mean, what is "finish the job"? My understanding is that The Job of All Jobs was to dethrone Saddam. We hung him by the neck. Then The Job became to find WMD. We could't find a trace of radioactive/chemical/biological shit. Second argument out the window. Seems to me we have no intention to get out and we're trying to find every reason in the (Mein Kamp) book to not have to get up and go.
We kill the enemy. We don't negotiate with the enemy.
And who exactly is the "enemy" in this case?
What side are you on anyways?
I'm on the side of reason and common sense. You, and the likes of you, are the people, the "menacing individuals", Adams, Hamilton,
et al, had warned us about.
Are you French by chance?
No, but I wish I could be.
My act is over. I am sorry if I offended you.
Niggga please!
PD: say hello to your sister for me.
