I've corrected you many times also. What's your point? And your debate skills leave much to be desired hence my comment about you getting verbally raped in the religious section. There are actually some intelligent people who post there.
Ronnie's back at the 01 ASC was huge. You're just playing with semantics to make it seem like he gives up a lot of size to Dorian. Ronnie's back was bigger than Dorian's by 99. So it was probably the same size at the 01 ASC when he competed at a lighter weight. It may have been small for Ronnie, but there's no reason to think it was smaller than Dorian's.
Ronnie's back has better v-taper, left-right symmetry, fullness and lower back thickness, without the disgusting bacne and folds of skin.
yeah I thought so
I've corrected you many times also. What's your point? And your debate skills leave much to be desired hence my comment about you getting verbally raped in the religious section. There are actually some intelligent people who post there.
You most certainly have NOT corrected me especially not on the subject of competitive bodybuilding , I've exposed how little you know countless times and the only reason you mentioned the religious section is because you feel you'd have more luck there and again at this point you're lucky I'm even responding to you , but I do enjoy correcting you
Ronnie's back at the 01 ASC was huge. You're just playing with semantics to make it seem like he gives up a lot of size to Dorian. Ronnie's back was bigger than Dorian's by 99. So it was probably the same size at the 01 ASC when he competed at a lighter weight. It may have been small for Ronnie, but there's no reason to think it was smaller than Dorian's.
Ronnie's back at 247 pounds was not HUGE it was at among its smallest albeit dense & defined , 2003 his back was huge ( and soft ) and you're damn right he gives up a lot of size when compared to a 269 pound Dorian Yates ! and Ronnie's back was bigger in 99 than Dorians? how the fuck did you come to this conclusion? your dumb ' comparisons ' ? stop typing blanket statements seriously , also keep in mind Ronnie has a small waist & hips that help add to the ILLUSION of width , Dorian's back is wide as fuck even with a thick waist so that should tell to a lot
Ronnie's back has better v-taper, left-right symmetry, fullness and lower back thickness, without the disgusting bacne and folds of skin.
a better taper doesn't mean his back is better thats weak , spare me the left/right symmetry thats a straw of the first order , fulless ( i.e. softness ) and lower back thickness thats just a retarded statement already dismissed
Dorian's back is better because he has better traps and why? they're bigger especially the lower traps and they're separated and striated , Ronnie's is NOT in the most muscular from the front you can actually see a split , Dorian's traps are denser as well
Dorian's lats are better they insert lower near the waist , they are feathered & striated in a manor that Coleman doesn't compare which is exactly why Yates' x-mass tree blows Ronnie's out of the water
Dorian's lower back is thicker , spinal erectors please look that up Mr Certified Personal Trainer the other reason why Dorian's x-mass tree looks so great and the picture I posted you can't see any acne so again nice try grasping at straws
Dorian has every thing Ronnie has and more hence he has a better back , hence why Team Flex said so in 1999 , among others
and I'm still waiting for pictures of Ronnie's traps striated & separated , lower lats feathered & striated & spinal erectors razor sharp that surpass this and I'll continue to wait because I've every pic you people posted and nothing matches these
