Idiot STRIATIONS are genetic not everyone has them and when the pose was named the levels of conditioning where NO WHERE near showing striations lmfao just another example of you not knowing what the fuck you're talking about lol fuck me you're simple
the side triceps is meant to showcase the triceps development. This includes definition. It doesn't matter if nobody had striated triceps when the pose was first named. Conditioning has improved since then. As a result, the standard for definition has been raised. Your objection is akin to me saying Dorian's striated traps, lats, and lower back don't matter since nobody had that level of conditioning when the back double biceps and back lat spread were named. Talk about a f*cking moron, and you're calling me simple?
again idiot what does any of these quotes have to do with DORIAN YATES at 269 pounds? NOTHING why do you do this to yourself? you make it to easy to expose how stupid you are
read your own comment again, you dumbass.
"I do disagree that Ronnie showed more definition in his back post 1999 his back was just as defined in 1998 as it was in 2001"
I wasn't comparing Ronnie with Dorian at 269 lbs. I was responding to your claim that Ronnie's back didn't improve from 98 to 01. Learn to read, dipshit.
please show me definitively where he states he would beat any of them , please Neo do so
Ronnie: "Come on now, this is the age of Ronnie Coleman who else would win?"
there are only 2 logical interpretations - either he would beat Dorian or Dorian would beat him. Which is it?