David Radius Hudson is credited by most people in the field as being the originator of the term “Orbitally Rearranged Monoatomic Elements”, or by its acronym, the ORME. Mr. Hudson began speaking publicly about his research and discoveries in 1995, when at that time he pointed out the multiple connections between the works of Zecharia Sitchin [1], the Anunnaki, the Tree of Life, The Egyptian Book of the Dead, Alchemy, Immanuel Velikovsky, Superconductivity, Ark of the Covenant, The Adam's Family, and more recently the works of Laurence Gardner. [2] There are also numerous researchers interested in a variation on the ORME, the ORMUS, where it is assumed that the working material is not necessary mono-atomic, but may be diatomic -- consisting of two (or more) atoms of the precious metals.
The story of Mr. Hudson’s efforts over the years is given in the form of a rough transcript of his presentation in 1995 at the International Forum on New Science in Fort Collins, Colorado. As such, it serves as an excellent introduction to the study of the ORME, and its immense implications. His story and the profound revelations of his work are well worth considerable study. This is only the beginning introduction.
_____________________
References:
[1] Sitchin, Zecharia, The 12th Planet, 1976, The Stairway to Heaven, 1980, The Wars of Gods and Men, 1985, The Lost Realms, When Time Began, Genesis Revisited, 1990, Divine Encounters, 1995, Avon Books, New York.
[2] Gardner, Laurence, Bloodline of the Holy Grail, 1996-1997, Barnes & Noble Books, New York; Genesis of the Grail Kings, 1999, Bantam Press, New York; Realm of the Ring Lords, 2000, Media Quest, Ottery St. Mary, England; and most importantly: Lost Secrets of the Sacred Ark, Amazing Revelations of the Incredible Powers of Gold, 2003, HarperCollins, London.
kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
DAVID HUDSON AT IFNS
I was buying gold and silver as an inflation hedge. Then got into producing gold from a natural source, old mining sources. Mining worked well with the farming. You beat Uncle Sam as much as possible out of taxes, and at the same time accumulate as much wealth as you can. Leaching gold with cyanide process is like leaching salt out in the farming process. More of a hobby than a business -- no intention of making money. But something I enjoyed very much. Did it for fun.
In the process of recovering gold and silver, I began to recover something else, which was causing losses of the gold and silver. Eventually it reached the point where the gold and silver would not recover at all because of the something else. I then shut it down, in order to find out what the problem material was. I am not a physicist or a chemist and had no idea what the stuff was. It would recover and had a specific gravity; it would recover in the molten lead like it was gold and silver; it would flow out of the lead; but when I held the lead down, I had nothing. The mining community refers to this as “ghost gold”, a non-assayable, non-identifiable form of gold.
I then became involved with someone who does emission spectroscopy (ES), and became aware of work done by the Soviet Academy of Sciences. When one does ES, it involves taking a carbon electrode, placing your sample on the carbon electrode, and then running a second carbon electrode down above it, and striking an arc. When you strike the arc, the elements ionize, and give off specific light frequencies. This is spectroscopic analysis. In the analysis, it's done for 10-15 seconds before the electrode is burned away, and American Spectroscopists claim that anything there will be ionized and read within those 15 minutes.
My sample was identified as Iron, Silicon and Aluminum. I then spent three years in finding ways to take away all the Fe, Si, and Al. Then, I still had 98% of the sample of the material. On the arc, the material didn’t indicate to be anything. It was nothing. Back to Cornell University, where I worked with a Ph.D. who did X-Ray Analysis. This involved: Cumming Microscopy, Diffraction Microscopy, Fluorescent Microscopy, and five other wonderful technologies. The Ph.D. said that it was Iron, Silicon, and Aluminum. Stayed there to remove it all. Whereupon, the Ph.D. said it was “pure nothing.” This wasn't good enough for me. I could hold it in my hands, weigh it, perform chemistries with it -- it was something. I then recalled that, according to the Soviet Academy of Sciences, the proper analytical tool is to burn the sample in the emission spectroscopic analysis for 300 seconds, not just 15.
To do this, you have to sheath the electrode with an inert gas -- keeping all the oxygen away from the DC arc. Otherwise, the carbon oxidizes and the electrode falls apart. I set up to do this, using Argon gas to sheath the electrode -- literally keeping the oxygen away. Because carbon is a very high temperature material, it will then last for 300 seconds. When the material was placed on the electrode and the arc was struck, there was no reading at all for 15 seconds [other than “electronic grass” on the scope, as well as Iron, Silicon, Aluminum, and occasionally, traces of Calcium]. Then the material went quiet.
[Argon gas if fundamentally crucial to Sonoluminesence, as well. It also has an identical crystalline structure to such elements as Rhodium and Iridium.]
Finally, after 90 seconds, Palladium (Pd) began to read; after 110 seconds, Platinum (Pt) began to read; at 130 seconds, Ruthenium (Ru); at about 140-150 seconds, Rhodium; at 190 seconds, Iridium; at 220 seconds, Osmium began to read. The Russians call this fractional vaporization. For example, when one has water in an iron container, you can't get the iron hotter than the boiling point of water as long as there is water present. This is the basis for cooling systems in engines, and why automobile engines don’t overheat, as long as there is water present. But once, the water is gone, the temperature rises very rapidly to the melting temperature of the iron.
[The temperature of any well-mixed solution undergoing a phase change will stay at the temperature of the phase change until the phase is completed. Also, the relevant boiling temperatures for the metals in the sample are: Calcium: 1420 oC, Iron: 1535 oC, Silicon: 2355 oC, Aluminum: 2327 oC; followed by: Palladium: >2200 oC, Rhodium: 2500 oC, Ruthenium: 4150 oC, Platinum: 4300 oC, Iridium: >4800 oC, Osmium: >5300 oC. (Silver has a boiling point of 1950 oC, while Gold’s boiling point is 2600 oC.)]
Essentially, all of the emissions from the elements were coming off in the sequence of their increasing boiling temperatures. The maximum temperature of the DC arc is, theoretically, in the center of the arc, 5450 to 5500 oC; while the sample was slightly away from the center. Thus all the heat went into boiling off one element at a time, in sequence of their boiling temperatures. They come off individually, as if there is nothing else in the sample.
I continued to run sample for 2 and a half years, comparing it to standard samples. The amazing thing is that commercially available samples of the precious metals, when placed in the emission spectroscopic DC arc, read within 15 seconds. (And they assume they’re reading it all.) But then it goes quiet, until after 90 seconds, it starts to read again. About 85% of the reading occurs at the end. In effect the people buying the commercially available samples and doing readings, are only doing about 15 to 20% of the sample. And they assume it’s everything. Short burn times don’t do the trick. They assume the standard, and yet this is not the correct standard.
Keep in mind that the Soviet Academy of Sciences, the most prestigious scientific body in the Soviet Union and Johnson-Mathewe-Inglehart produce all the precious metals in the world. The mining activity of the best deposit in the world in South Africa for six of these elements (Pd, Pt, Os, Ru, Ir, and Rh -- i.e. no silver or gold) may yield only one-third of one ounce of the precious metals per ton of ore. They go a half mile down into the ground, following an 18 inch seam of material, to get 1/3 of 1 oz per ton of all the precious elements. No one else knows it’s there, and no one can analyze it. We, on the other hand, are able to derive and identify out of one ton of ore: 6-8 ounces of Palladium, 12-13 ounces of Platinum, 150 ounces of Osmium, 250 ounces of Ruthenium, 600 ounces of Iridium, and 1200 ounces of Rhodium!!
This was then confirmed by a highly respected chemist and spectroscopy, including all of the colors of the solutions being correct, all the oxidation potentials were basically correct, all of the physical properties were correct. An analytical chemist. Consider Rhodium. Rhodium produces a crimson, blood red colored salt. That is how it got its name, from the rose colored salt, and the only element which produces this color. Very conspicuous.
When you precipitate Rhodium out of solution, you add bromade as the oxidizer, then you do a neutralization of the acid, and the hydroxide precipitates out of the solution. You filter it, dry it, oxidize it, hydrogen reduce it, and you should have metal. (Standard procedure). But we neutralized the solution of the pure Rhodium, got a red brown dioxide, filtered that out, dried it, and heated it in a tube furnace under oxygen up to 850 degrees for an hour to dehydrate it, and we’d get this red brown idoxide. Then we put it back in the tube furnace and hydrogen reduce it to a gray powder, and then take the gray powder in a tube furnace at 1000 degrees under argon, and it turned snow white.
A commercial spectroscopic firm then analyzed three samples, and again picked up Iron, Aluminum, Silicon and Calcium. There was no consistency between the three samples, which were all the same. The material was 99.9% pure Rhodium, in different stages of the processing.
The standards that are sold as labeled as RhCl3, when in reality they are Rh12Cl36. It still has metal-metal bonds. Even without the Chlorine, you still have the metal bonds, which are never lost. But if you take Rhodium to the monoatomic state, you can end up with HRhCl4. Then when you take away the Chloride, you get HRh (Hydrogen Rhodide). A rhodide is a -1, instead of a +1. The physical properties are more like an Iodide.
When gold is produced as a monoatomic gold, it’s a forest green color. As a metal, it’s a yellow gold. No one has monoatomic gold as a commercial product. Monoatomic gold is much more powerful, as in a fuel cell. Boiling gold will never result in a monoatomic gold. Gold has the 5d, 6s1 electron structure (the single s electron, like Sodium, Potassium, Hydrogen, and Lithium), and is thus explosively reactive. Except that in the case of gold, it's gold reacting with gold.
But in the bowels of the earth, in the volcanoes, nature is producing monoatomic gold. When it comes out, 98% of the gold coming out is monoatomic, 2% is metal. [Thus Hudson may not be making monoatomic gold, he separating it instead.] We have worked with the yellow gold, converting it, but always coming back to yellow gold. But when we get monoatomic gold, it never goes back to yellow. And as monoatomic gold, it is not metallic, has none of the metallic qualities of yellow gold.
If you use thermo-gravometric analysis, and you produce monoatomic gold, you get sort of a gray-black, hydrogen Auride (HAu). When you heat it, and the proton is annealed away, this is the same way you produce Amorphous Silicon (Silane to Amorphous Silicon). When you heat it, the proton is annealed away, it goes to a snow white powder! It loses 4/9th of its weight. If you take it back to metal, it regains the weight. As you kept annealing the material, it would levitate - literally taking the pan with it. In cooling, it would sometimes go to 2 or 300% of the weight. In heating, it goes to less than nothing.
This only happens in the white powder form. But mass has never left. Losing weight when cooling the material (approaching absolute zero), and you have a superconductor.
A superconductor is a material that has a single wavelength in the sample, a single vibration or frequency, much like a laser. By definition, a superconductor does not allow any voltage potential to exist within it; it’s perfect amperage, but no voltage. To hook up wires with ordinary current to the superconductor and get the electrons off the wire, you need voltage. You have the tune the vibrational frequency of the electrons in the wire to that of the superconductors. And to get them off.
The electrons going into the superconductor have to pair, with a time forward electron with a time reverse electron. When they pair, they become light. Any amount of light can exist in the superconductor. It doesn’t reside in any space time. The only way to prove it’s a superconductor, is to measure a Meissner field. Non-polar field (only field of its kind). Superconductivity responds to magnetic fields. Earth’s magnetic field is larger.
A superconductor can see your thoughts in your brain. Different parts of your brain lights up when you eat something sweet or something sour -- it’s a superconductor that sees it.