Author Topic: is more really better?  (Read 1716 times)

rawdawg

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 114
is more really better?
« on: March 06, 2008, 06:48:31 PM »
I have heard difference in opinions on this.That more is better.

I have always done 250mg x 2 of test and havnet had a problem.

people say bump it up to 700mg to 1000mg a week and youll get better results. Do you all think this is true?

Arnold jr

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7247
  • fleshandiron.com
Re: is more really better?
« Reply #1 on: March 06, 2008, 06:56:45 PM »
If it's HG, yes.

Rimbaud

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9884
  • There can be only one.
Re: is more really better?
« Reply #2 on: March 06, 2008, 06:58:11 PM »
Generally more is better however at some point you will meet diminishing returns & more will be pointless.

windsor88

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2580
  • Victim of the Drug War
Re: is more really better?
« Reply #3 on: March 06, 2008, 07:01:35 PM »
I got a buddy that did 1250 a week of test-e for 10 weeks.  looks the same as he did before he started.  Got stronger but was still fat as hell. It all depends on diet and training regimen.

rawdawg

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 114
Re: is more really better?
« Reply #4 on: March 06, 2008, 07:01:51 PM »
so im good were im at?

Rimbaud

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9884
  • There can be only one.
Re: is more really better?
« Reply #5 on: March 06, 2008, 07:03:12 PM »
so im good were im at?

Depends...are you happy with where your at?

candidizzle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9046
  • Trueprotein.com 5% discount code= TRB953
Re: is more really better?
« Reply #6 on: March 06, 2008, 07:31:01 PM »
If it's HG, yes.
i like that answer.. :)

Beener

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1124
Re: is more really better?
« Reply #7 on: March 06, 2008, 07:40:23 PM »
i like that answer.. :)

Somebody make this man a mod.


And yeah more is always better. If you wanna get bigger and awesomer, that is. Well in the range you're talkin about at least.

E N A N T H A T O R

  • Time Out
  • Getbig III
  • *
  • Posts: 644
Re: is more really better?
« Reply #8 on: March 06, 2008, 07:49:05 PM »
i like that answer.. :)
To see a kid like you taking steroids before reaching your natural potential is sad.

Beener

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1124
Re: is more really better?
« Reply #9 on: March 06, 2008, 09:02:09 PM »
To see a kid like you taking steroids before reaching your natural potential is sad.

Fuck natural potential, thats pussy talk. Whats funny is that hes like 3 weeks into his first cycle and hes already a guru.

rawdawg

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 114
Re: is more really better?
« Reply #10 on: March 06, 2008, 09:31:09 PM »
Depends...are you happy with where your at?

theres always room for improvement but I think im good were im at 500mg test week 100mg tren E week

candidizzle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9046
  • Trueprotein.com 5% discount code= TRB953
Re: is more really better?
« Reply #11 on: March 07, 2008, 07:41:11 AM »
Fuck natural potential, thats pussy talk. Whats funny is that hes like 3 weeks into his first cycle and hes already a guru.
haha ...   ill give it to you, that is pretty funny ..




4thAD

  • Guest
Re: is more really better?
« Reply #12 on: March 07, 2008, 08:50:25 AM »
To see a kid like you taking steroids before reaching your natural potential is sad.

You don't need to reach natural potential before using gear! How many Pro's, or top NPC competitors waited until they reach their so called natural potential before they started running gear? Probably none!

I will always try and discourage young guys(under 23 or so) from using gear. I am not completely against 18 yo guys running low dose cycles, especially if they have their sites set on the pro ranks, or they are promising athletes. One thing Candy has that a lot of people on this board fail to recognize is heart. How many people his age have the discipline to change their physiques like he did? Not many. Guys can talk out their asses all day long how Candy doesn't have the genetics. But, he is still young. Probably still growing, and no one knows how he will look until he fills out and gets big and ripped. There are pics all over the net of some of the older pro's when they were just skinny little kids. Not looking to show to much potential. I personally think Candy has the potential to be a great body builder. Pro or not will be determined in the years to come. It will be a true test of genetics, heart, and will.

NO! More is not always better.

candidizzle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9046
  • Trueprotein.com 5% discount code= TRB953
Re: is more really better?
« Reply #13 on: March 07, 2008, 08:54:43 AM »
thanks alot ad!

Overload

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7464
  • KO Artist
Re: is more really better?
« Reply #14 on: March 07, 2008, 09:40:14 AM »
More is better for certain things, just remember the more AAS you use, the more sides you will get.

anything over 1500mg Test seems to be a waste for the average lifter but i know guys who used much more than that and were as strong as a gorilla.

8)

Beener

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1124
Re: is more really better?
« Reply #15 on: March 07, 2008, 03:45:40 PM »
haha ...   ill give it to you, that is pretty funny ..




I'm just jokin' around Candi, I cant fault you for being dedicated as shit and startin a cycle. You'll definately make it somewhere if you keep up as motivated as you are now, so more power to you.

My guru jokes still stand, though ;)

candidizzle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9046
  • Trueprotein.com 5% discount code= TRB953
Re: is more really better?
« Reply #16 on: March 08, 2008, 07:20:27 AM »


I'm just jokin' around Candi, I cant fault you for being dedicated as shit and startin a cycle. You'll definately make it somewhere if you keep up as motivated as you are now, so more power to you.

My guru jokes still stand, though ;)
thanks man. i wish everybody saw it that way. too many haters out there..   

benz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6333
  • ٩(̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾)۶ boo! ٩(̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾)۶
Re: is more really better?
« Reply #17 on: March 08, 2008, 07:31:06 AM »
Why the mods on this board are allowing a 17 years old that usually brag about his sources and his pic is posted all over the site, to write here?
Yes im talking about candidildo.

candidildo im not joking https://tips.fbi.gov/

gtfo while you can, you aint helping anybody here

.

candidizzle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9046
  • Trueprotein.com 5% discount code= TRB953
Re: is more really better?
« Reply #18 on: March 08, 2008, 07:39:47 AM »
bro im not 17. i brag?
yeah; okay ::)

benz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6333
  • ٩(̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾)۶ boo! ٩(̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾)۶
Re: is more really better?
« Reply #19 on: March 08, 2008, 10:28:45 AM »
bro im not 17. i brag?
yeah; okay ::)


"bro" i think you aint taking me serious, but if you want to test me, just ask
.

E N A N T H A T O R

  • Time Out
  • Getbig III
  • *
  • Posts: 644
Re: is more really better?
« Reply #20 on: March 08, 2008, 08:51:34 PM »
You don't need to reach natural potential before using gear! How many Pro's, or top NPC competitors waited until they reach their so called natural potential before they started running gear? Probably none!

I will always try and discourage young guys(under 23 or so) from using gear. I am not completely against 18 yo guys running low dose cycles, especially if they have their sites set on the pro ranks, or they are promising athletes. One thing Candy has that a lot of people on this board fail to recognize is heart. How many people his age have the discipline to change their physiques like he did? Not many. Guys can talk out their asses all day long how Candy doesn't have the genetics. But, he is still young. Probably still growing, and no one knows how he will look until he fills out and gets big and ripped. There are pics all over the net of some of the older pro's when they were just skinny little kids. Not looking to show to much potential. I personally think Candy has the potential to be a great body builder. Pro or not will be determined in the years to come. It will be a true test of genetics, heart, and will.

NO! More is not always better.
Time and heavy use will be the best indication of candizzles potential. And if he doesn't reach his gols what has he lost? Health? Money? Career focus something that will Actually pay the bills. O.K. hit it hard boy and don't look back!!!!! Better luck playing the lottery kid.

Rimbaud

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9884
  • There can be only one.
Re: is more really better?
« Reply #21 on: March 09, 2008, 09:36:04 AM »
Why the mods on this board are allowing a 17 years old that usually brag about his sources and his pic is posted all over the site, to write here?
Yes im talking about candidildo.

candidildo im not joking https://tips.fbi.gov/

gtfo while you can, you aint helping anybody here

He's 18 almost 19. He can post here if he chooses to (but he's walking a fine line here & there with some of the rules & his posts). I personally don't agree with his use (because of his age) however it's his choice. My only hope is he's safe about it. With that being said he's obviously not being too smart by posting his pics (with his face) & then bragging about sources at his gym & such. He doesn't seem to concerned about it so let him get busted if that's in the cards (not wishing that on him but he accuses me of being overly paranoid - but I'd rather be a little paranoid then in jail right?). People need to take him for what it's worth - he's not a guru - he's just a kid who's taken a couple shots of test. I'm not trying to knock the kid but he should respect those of us who've been around the block a few more times but he doesn't really take advice or show too much respect on other boards so why should this be any different?

benz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6333
  • ٩(̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾)۶ boo! ٩(̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾)۶
Re: is more really better?
« Reply #22 on: March 09, 2008, 09:46:39 AM »
He's 18 almost 19. He can post here if he chooses to (but he's walking a fine line here & there with some of the rules & his posts). I personally don't agree with his use (because of his age) however it's his choice. My only hope is he's safe about it. With that being said he's obviously not being too smart by posting his pics (with his face) & then bragging about sources at his gym & such. He doesn't seem to concerned about it so let him get busted if that's in the cards (not wishing that on him but he accuses me of being overly paranoid - but I'd rather be a little paranoid then in jail right?). People need to take him for what it's worth - he's not a guru - he's just a kid who's taken a couple shots of test. I'm not trying to knock the kid but he should respect those of us who've been around the block a few more times but he doesn't really take advice or show too much respect on other boards so why should this be any different?


haha he's 17 come on, a few months ago he was 16, then 17 and now almost 19! He has been lying to all of you, in another forum he brag about having a car, motorcycle, a yacht, an airplane lol...ive been tracking him for quite a long time, i know he's full of bullshit and probably just pissing off people around.
He must be banned, people like him made trab quit.

Candidildo's pic soon will be in fbi's hand fo sure
.

Rimbaud

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9884
  • There can be only one.
Re: is more really better?
« Reply #23 on: March 09, 2008, 09:57:44 AM »
I'm almost positive almost two years ago he was 16. Which could make him 18 (maybe almost 19) now. In the pics section there's a thread in which he compares himself to alexxx (claiming more muscle & such).

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=66328.0 (Started August 2006)

As I said before he's walking a fine line right now. I don't think there's anyone out there who would agree that he's not playing too safe (i.e. pics on the web, bragging about sources, etc). Like I said if he gets busted he gets busted. I don't wish the kid harm but he's playing with fire & doesn't seem to care or realize it.