Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
October 23, 2019, 05:43:21 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
Author Topic: Another pet-food recall could happen  (Read 883 times)
Getbig IV
Posts: 3592


« on: March 17, 2008, 05:43:52 AM »

Another pet-food recall could happen

Christie Keith

Saturday, March 15, 2008

A year ago Canada's Menu Foods announced it was recalling more than 60 million containers of dog and cat food sold in the United States. Although the name Menu Foods wasn't familiar to pet owners, the recalled cans and pouches bore the labels of dozens of the most familiar and trusted brands in the marketplace.

In the end, more than a thousand brands of pet food were recalled over a period of about four months, and two chemicals, melamine and cyanuric acid, were blamed for the kidney failure that killed thousands and sickened tens of thousands of pets from what came to be called melamine-associated renal failure. Once the contaminants were identified, the reason they ended up in pet food was clear: profit. Melamine and cyanuric acid falsely test as proteins in certain analyses of food ingredients. They were added to plain wheat flour in China, enabling it to be sold as more expensive, higher-protein ingredients like gluten.

Largest recall in history

I didn't guess when I began covering this story with Gina Spadafori at Pet Connection ( that it would turn into the largest consumer recall in history, trigger an international trade scandal, launch congressional hearings and proposed legislation on food safety, and result in the indictment of American and Chinese businesses owners. I couldn't have foreseen that the incident would put a spotlight on Chinese imports that would eventually reveal lead in children's toys and toxins in toothpaste and prompt a recent recall of the drug heparin.

But it's equally hard to believe that after all that, the answer to the question "Could it happen again?" is probably "Yes."

The reason is simple: None of the changes that might prevent a repeat have been implemented. Inspections of pet food plants haven't improved; the patchwork of state, federal and industry manufacturing standards and regulations haven't been overhauled; transparency and accountability haven't increased - not even something as simple as printing the name and contact information of the actual manufacturer on pet food labels - and pet food labeling laws haven't been revised. The FDA still does not have mandatory-recall authority.

"In this age of potential bio-terror and random cross-species crossover horrors like the avian flu, this is incomprehensible," said Pet Connection editor Spadafori. "Our animals are the canaries in the coal mine, and as bad as the death toll was in our pets, it could have been much, much worse, in both animal and human populations. So why is there still not a national veterinary reporting system for a nationwide emergence of disease that is not only killing animals but could also potentially already be in or emerging in the human population? And why are we still unable to inspect all but the tiniest percentage of imported foods?"

Marion Nestle, a professor of nutrition, food studies and public health at New York University and a well-known author of popular books on food safety, food politics and nutrition, has a book due out in September, "Pet Food Politics: The Chihuahua in the Coal Mine." "I'd like to think that fundamental changes have occurred," she told me. "The pet food industry as a whole took a big hit, and everyone learned some lessons. Companies across the board are looking more carefully at sources, demanding and doing more testing, and upping their quality controls."

Unfortunately, she said, that's not enough. "The industry's responses are voluntary, and they need to do more to restore trust. Food industries cannot be counted on to regulate themselves, and until there is better regulation - including FDA recall authority and better labeling - there will still be grounds for distrust."

Nestle isn't completely pessimistic, however. "I'd like to think that some good will result from this mess, and I do see hopeful signs. Lots of companies say they are using better ingredients in their products, being much more careful about where their ingredients come from, and demanding higher standards from suppliers and co-packers. Companies say they are testing for melamine and other toxins. Some of the testing is driven by retailers. Pet Food Express, for example, only sells products from companies that provide actual test data."

If the pet food industry or the FDA had put that kind of testing in place earlier, the 2007 recall might not have happened at all. The adulteration of protein concentrates with melamine and cyanuric acid was found to be both long-standing and widespread in China, so it seemed unlikely that something like this hadn't happened before.
Pets died in 2004

In fact, it had. The Journal of Veterinary Diagnosis Investigation ( recently reported that melamine and cyanuric acid contamination was responsible for the deaths of thousands of pets in 2004.

Researchers working with tissue samples from animals that died in the American recall compared them to samples from pets that died in a number of Asian countries, including the Philippines, Japan, South Korea and Hong Kong. Those deaths led to a recall of Pedigree dog foods and Whiskas cat foods, and were blamed on mycotoxin contamination. But the study found that both groups of pets had the unmistakable crystals and damage in the kidneys caused by melamine and cyanuric acid.

While there's no evidence that any other mycotoxin-attributed food recalls, pet or human, were misidentified, it does put the pet food recall squarely in the big picture of this country's broken food-safety system. A fix for that broken system may be coming, even if it's a bit slow. The FDA recently announced a meeting to discuss changes in the regulation of pet food ingredients, processing and labeling with representatives from the pet food industry, government agencies, veterinary medical associations, animal health organizations and pet food manufacturers. One group not on that list is pet owners, but they have asked to hear from us. Comments should be made on docket No. 2007n-0487 at

"The recalls exposed deep problems with food safety regulation in China as well as in the United States, and I see many signs of efforts to do something about them," Nestle said. "Lasting improvements won't happen overnight, and they won't happen at all unless people who care about these issues keep pressuring the industry and the FDA to do what they say they will do."

Christie Keith writes the Your Whole Pet column on Send comments to

This article appeared on page F - 3 of the San Francisco Chronicle
Report to moderator   Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Jump to:  

Theme created by Egad Community. Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!