Author Topic: Wolf vs. Heath @ Fibo (Read 4297 times)

word to the wise - as thick as heath can get his chest, it's still gonna look small compared to someone of wolf's width's... even if wolf has a thinner chest.

RZA · « **Reply #12 on:** April 16, 2008, 05:24:45 AM »

From that pic, Wolf is way more impressive. Amazing shoulder separation, way better chest and Heath looks way softer.

Ex Coelis · « **Reply #13 on:** April 16, 2008, 05:43:33 AM »

Quote from: Mars on April 16, 2008, 01:58:44 AM

wolf by a country smile, heath looks like a blown up marsmellow.

agreed. Heath has more of a grimace - wolf's smile is much nicer in those pictures

Faust · « **Reply #14 on:** April 16, 2008, 05:53:53 AM »

Quote from: affeman on April 16, 2008, 01:45:28 AM

Discuss

Damn, look at those shoulders on Wolf

.

To be fair, that's Wolf's best pose so he will destroy most people on that, even Cutler who is very wide with good shoulders.

Meso_z · « **Reply #15 on:** April 16, 2008, 06:31:14 AM »

Actually i would like to see some striations on wolfs chest in that pose, maybe if he could somehow improve his mm pose....

Monster_Everything · « **Reply #16 on:** April 16, 2008, 06:36:17 AM »

Heaths back has more cuts and seperation, wolf is as wide as a 747 but imho his traps and shoulders overpower his rear shots , from the front Its even except that Wolf has a better chest. Both are top arms in the game , bot have good waist, quads ect. But having a big chest is better than the advantage of a smaller but more define back. So Wolf is better than Heath.

swilkins1984 · « **Reply #17 on:** April 16, 2008, 06:44:50 AM »

Wolf's width is going to always be a problem for Phil. Theres going to be some awesome showdowns soon.

Monster_Everything · « **Reply #18 on:** April 16, 2008, 06:46:27 AM »

the you have Vic M who has both a wide and detailed back with a huge chest

GoneAway · « **Reply #19 on:** April 16, 2008, 06:47:11 AM »

Quote from: Monster_Everything on April 16, 2008, 06:36:17 AM

Heaths back has more cuts and seperation, wolf is as wide as a 747 but imho his traps and shoulders overpower his rear shots , from the front Its even except that Wolf has a better chest. Both are top arms in the game , bot have good waist, quads ect. But having a big chest is better than the advantage of a smaller but more define back. So Wolf is better than Heath.

back > chest in Olympia.

1. Cutler
2. Wolf
3. Dex
4. Heath

_bruce_ · « **Reply #20 on:** April 16, 2008, 06:50:27 AM »

Wolf - all the way. Looks very solid - like you could break a baseball-bat on his back.

affeman · « **Reply #21 on:** April 16, 2008, 07:38:36 AM »

Everybody who was there (they stepped on stage immedeately one after another) says Wolf will KILL Heath at the Olympia, no contest at all.

Up the dosage Phil, you still got a few months...

gymguy · « **Reply #22 on:** April 16, 2008, 08:26:57 AM »

Heath has already proved himself twice this year. Wolf has not.

The.Giant · « **Reply #23 on:** April 16, 2008, 09:39:14 AM »

~~Franco~~ Heath is great but he's just a child.

johnnytosh · « **Reply #24 on:** April 19, 2008, 07:26:36 PM »

WOLF all the way. He's simply too wide for Phil.
Sorry.