Author Topic: THE WORLD'S UNLUCKIEST BODYBUILDER.  (Read 7251 times)

Luke Wood

  • Pros
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 1135
  • Getbig!
Re: THE WORLD'S UNLUCKIEST BODYBUILDER.
« Reply #50 on: April 23, 2008, 03:07:34 PM »
WOW!! A thread on me Hank!!! Thankyou so much my friend! You are without a doubt my most loyal fan!!! ;)

hazbin

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5750
Re: THE WORLD'S UNLUCKIEST BODYBUILDER.
« Reply #51 on: April 23, 2008, 03:13:39 PM »
Branch's physique is completely different!! Branch has balanced his physique out over time, taking time to not train his legs to let his upper body catch up.  Luke should do this with some of his bodyparts...except fixing his physique is a lot more complicated than it was to fix Branch's and Luke will never sacrifice any size in order to balance out.


stupid comparsion between a top 3 Arnold finisher and a 3rd tier bottom dweller :-\

i disagree, which is not uncommon in a subjective sport. i just don't know why you took such offense to my words and felt the need to be insulting.

rik

New Hank Wood

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 3712
Re: THE WORLD'S UNLUCKIEST BODYBUILDER.
« Reply #52 on: April 23, 2008, 03:20:36 PM »
WOW!! A thread on me Hank!!! Thankyou so much my friend! You are without a doubt my most loyal fan!!! ;)

Luke, you have a great sense of humour.  You are a hard worker and show dedication to the sport.  But for some reason you have a problem with criticism.

You are not perfect Luke, far from it. 

Many on here find your physique grotesque. This is not a criticism of you as a person, but merely a 'visual/aesthetic' critique!

I just hope you are not still taking advices from Milos anymore?



You look good here.

Luke Wood

  • Pros
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 1135
  • Getbig!
Re: THE WORLD'S UNLUCKIEST BODYBUILDER.
« Reply #53 on: April 23, 2008, 08:57:31 PM »
Luke, you have a great sense of humour.  You are a hard worker and show dedication to the sport.  But for some reason you have a problem with criticism.

You are not perfect Luke, far from it. 

Many on here find your physique grotesque. This is not a criticism of you as a person, but merely a 'visual/aesthetic' critique!

I just hope you are not still taking advices from Milos anymore?


MMM!! i wish i had arms like that!!! sorry but that picture is not me! Legs are too small!! ;D

If have also taken your advice Hank and have CONTINUED to keep working with Milos!! Thankyou for making me see that Hank!




You look good here.

Lamplighterx

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 809
  • I support the Wizard of Truth
Re: THE WORLD'S UNLUCKIEST BODYBUILDER.
« Reply #54 on: April 23, 2008, 08:59:32 PM »
Luke, you messed up the quote function!!

And hello from the east coast! We are big fans of yours out here!
Proud to be a member of Team Nasser

New Hank Wood

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 3712
Re: THE WORLD'S UNLUCKIEST BODYBUILDER.
« Reply #55 on: April 23, 2008, 09:01:31 PM »
So you are continuing your work with Milos?  Or more accurately, Milos is continuing to experiment on you!


chaos

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59587
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
Re: THE WORLD'S UNLUCKIEST BODYBUILDER.
« Reply #56 on: April 23, 2008, 09:17:26 PM »

Luke, fucking up the quote function is reserved for CalvinH.....keep that in mind for your next quote.



You coming back to the Koloseum anytime soon?
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

Dballn247

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6081
  • That's how I roll.
Re: THE WORLD'S UNLUCKIEST BODYBUILDER.
« Reply #57 on: April 23, 2008, 10:09:11 PM »
Hide, although he maybe up there with the dumbest.
\

New Hank Wood

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 3712
Re: THE WORLD'S UNLUCKIEST BODYBUILDER.
« Reply #58 on: April 23, 2008, 10:47:21 PM »
Luke, remember the old muscle tv days?  You had one massive back.  I think Tony once referred to it as the biggest back in Australia.


ozman

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1422
Re: THE WORLD'S UNLUCKIEST BODYBUILDER.
« Reply #59 on: April 23, 2008, 10:56:23 PM »

ozman

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1422
Re: THE WORLD'S UNLUCKIEST BODYBUILDER.
« Reply #60 on: April 23, 2008, 10:57:51 PM »
DOH


HTexan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20031
  • Heath must lose!!
Re: THE WORLD'S UNLUCKIEST BODYBUILDER.
« Reply #61 on: April 23, 2008, 11:14:09 PM »
barry bonds  ;D
A

Luke Wood

  • Pros
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 1135
  • Getbig!
Re: THE WORLD'S UNLUCKIEST BODYBUILDER.
« Reply #62 on: April 24, 2008, 12:18:10 AM »
Luke, remember the old muscle tv days?  You had one massive back.  I think Tony once referred to it as the biggest back in Australia.



LOL!!! i had no back!!! I was all NECK!!! i was 230lbs in that 2004 Australian Pro show. I took 15mths off competing came back to the NY pro 2005 like this! Under Milos!

New Hank Wood

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 3712
Re: THE WORLD'S UNLUCKIEST BODYBUILDER.
« Reply #63 on: April 24, 2008, 02:31:46 AM »
LOL!!! i had no back!!! I was all NECK!!! i was 230lbs in that 2004 Australian Pro show. I took 15mths off competing came back to the NY pro 2005 like this! Under Milos!

Yeah, that's your opinion, Tony Doherty thought otherwise!

Luke, you are very defiant and defensive when Milos' name is brought into the mix.  Why is that so?

Anyway, hope this extended lay-off is working for you.  Hope to see you back on stage at least by the next decade!