IQ By Country... Is this accurate?

[ToxicAvenger]

 Vince Basile

 

[G o a t b o y]

You know, Vince Basile...  inventor of everything:

[The Master]

Vince Basiles IQ = 150.

[G o a t b o y]

thats cause she's currylicious 

Junaids appears to be using ex-David Letterman writers for his material these days.

[Matt C]

Seems like Black History Month = not filled up with many stories about very successful black inventors, eh?

Kind of hard to fill a month with people who didn't exist. 

Interesting.  A wiki article credits Garrett Morgan, a black Ameican with the invention in 1916.  A bit of revisionist history going on at Wikipedia, perhaps?   

Jewypedia giving in to revisionist agendas?  No way. 

[G o a t b o y]

Kind of hard to fill a month with people who didn't exist. 

C'mon...  George Washington Carver invented the peanut, you know. 

[G o a t b o y]

Jewypedia giving in to revisionist agendas?  No way. 

Here's some interesting info on the gas mask and the Garrett Morgan myth:


http://www33.brinkster.com/iiiii/gasmask/page.html

[The Master]

Question: What has african people invented and contributed to mankind? Anything real worthwhile at all? Why is their continent so incredibly unsuccessful, despite having huge amounts of resources? Why are countries like Nigeria, Somalia and Sudan practically fucked up i each their own way? Can it actually be because of low IQ, partially due to genetics for dumbness? At least partially?

It seems very hard to believe that africans are so god damn unsuccessful in almost everything they do compared to whites and asians accross the globe just because of "colonization" and "the white man".

At the same time, they have good genetics for sports, where they are very successful.

[ToxicAvenger]

Junaids appears to be using ex-David Letterman writers for his material these days.

i'm actually doing a lab with my students and posting at the same time...


i rock!

[bigdumbbell]

THE JOB - URINE TEST


Like a lot of folks in this state, I have a job. I work, they pay me. I
pay my taxes and the government distributes my taxes as it sees fit. In
order to get that paycheck, I am required to pass a random urine test
with which I have no problem. What I do have a problem with is the
distribution of my taxes to people who don't have to pass a urine test.
Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check because I
have to pass one to earn it for them? Please under stand, I have no
problem with helping people get back on their feet. I do, on the other
hand, have a problem with helping someone sitting on their A#@, doing
drugs, while I work. . . . Can you imagine how much money the state
would save if people had to pass a urine test to get a public assistance
check ?

[240 is Back]

passing urine test = pre-req for welfare.... AWESOME IDEA!

[Big_Tymer]

absolutely, that is a genius idea. 

so would temporarily sterilizing everyone while they receive welfare checks.  Cant tell you how many times ive seen cops on tv and they go to some white trash/nig house and they have 5-6 kids running around.

[Croatch]

passing urine test = pre-req for welfare.... AWESOME IDEA!

Brilliant.  No wonder our country does NOT do this.   Drug testing also costs money, but I'd bet you would save a bundle by testing Section 8 scum.

[Camel Jockey]

Blacks haven't done shit. They've always been brutalized and owned throughout history.

Funny to me how they have to be handed the accomplishments of others. Very disrespectful.

[Matt C]

Interesting.  A wiki article credits Garrett Morgan, a black Ameican with the invention in 1916.  A bit of revisionist history going on at Wikipedia, perhaps?   

As for Dr. Daniel Hale Williams in 1893? No!

Dr. Williams repaired a wound not in the heart muscle itself, but in the sac surrounding it, the pericardium. This operation was not the first of its type: Henry Dalton of St. Louis performed a nearly identical operation two years earlier, with the patient fully recovering. Decades before that, the Spaniard Francisco Romero carried out the first successful pericardial surgery of any type, incising the pericardium to drain fluid compressing the heart.

Surgery on the actual human heart muscle, and not just the pericardium, was first successfully accomplished by Ludwig Rehn of Germany when he repaired a wounded right ventricle in 1896. More than 50 years later came surgery on the open heart, pioneered by John Lewis, C. Walton Lillehei (often called the "father of open heart surgery") and John Gibbon (who invented the heart-lung machine).

Source: brinkster; demolishing the pro-black, anti-white Jew owned About.com (such fine purveyors of these black invention myths) for years now.

http://www33.brinkster.com/iiiii/inventions

Here is a clip of me from today deadlifting 410:

I had 4-5 in me.  I don't know why I quit to be honest.  I guess I underestimated by strength but upon looking at the clip, I quit early.  I will be doing 8-10 by the end of the summer easy.

I'm going all out on the Higher Power stack!  More info here:

http://www.bodybuildingpro.com/higherpowerm3muscleboundreview.html

[MMC78]

Question: What has african people invented and contributed to mankind? Anything real worthwhile at all? Why is their continent so incredibly unsuccessful, despite having huge amounts of resources? Why are countries like Nigeria, Somalia and Sudan practically fucked up i each their own way? Can it actually be because of low IQ, partially due to genetics for dumbness? At least partially?

It seems very hard to believe that africans are so god damn unsuccessful in almost everything they do compared to whites and asians accross the globe just because of "colonization" and "the white man".

At the same time, they have good genetics for sports, where they are very successful.

Has the Great Debussey read the Pulitzer prize winning Guns, Germs, and Steel?
http://www.amazon.com/Guns-Germs-Steel-Jared-Diamond/dp/0739467352/ref=pd_bbs_sr_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1210749931&sr=8-2

[smaul]

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/7e/IQ_by_Country.png

Seems accurate, I'm in the green zone 

[disco_stu]

I doubt it.  They have china tracked at over 100... when you consider that the majority of those 1.5 billion are still crapping out their windows, it seems hard to believe they have us all beat in IQ

classic sub 100 IQ reply there 240. way to hold up GB.com's average.

it doesnt surprise me at all considering that a "100" IQ is the population mean.

Thats what IQ is. It's the mean intelligence of the population.

It is biased towards certain types of learning, sure, but its designed so that knowledge plays only a small part..so those countries that arent exposed to problems that require analytical or perceptual practice could score lower...but its more the test than the intelligence thats at fault.

the idea is that for a large enough sample of people tested, the average score is taken, and that becomes equal to 100. People who score 50% better score 150, 50% worse score 50.

so, the chart doesnt really show who's smart and who's not- its more an indication of how applicable the IQ test is across the world.

believe it or not, genetically, out of a million people in afghanistan, or ethiopia or kazhakstan- the same number of people will be genius' as for any other country. Its a relative measure.

a person in the US, who is 50% smarter than the average will be just as smart as a person in nigeria who is 50% smarter than that average.

Cultural differences push the absolute score up and down around the mean. China- being heavily populated and industrialised has alot of people competing for their livelihood and its not surprising that they score well. Other countries do better in the gene pool also..just born smarter.

hate to say it, but hitler's purge probably resulted in a lift of the avg IQ and its legacy for generations. not in particular the jewish, but what he referred to as the lame and weak etc etc.

china has a history of similar purging but itd be a long bow to suggest that that's the reason.

[G o a t b o y]

classic sub 100 IQ reply there 240. way to hold up GB.com's average.

it doesnt surprise me at all considering that a "100" IQ is the population mean.

Thats what IQ is. It's the mean intelligence of the population.

It is biased towards certain types of learning, sure, but its designed so that knowledge plays only a small part..so those countries that arent exposed to problems that require analytical or perceptual practice could score lower...but its more the test than the intelligence thats at fault.

the idea is that for a large enough sample of people tested, the average score is taken, and that becomes equal to 100. People who score 50% better score 150, 50% worse score 50.

so, the chart doesnt really show who's smart and who's not- its more an indication of how applicable the IQ test is across the world.

believe it or not, genetically, out of a million people in afghanistan, or ethiopia or kazhakstan- the same number of people will be genius' as for any other country. Its a relative measure.

a person in the US, who is 50% smarter than the average will be just as smart as a person in nigeria who is 50% smarter than that average.

Cultural differences push the absolute score up and down around the mean. China- being heavily populated and industrialised has alot of people competing for their livelihood and its not surprising that they score well. Other countries do better in the gene pool also..just born smarter.

hate to say it, but hitler's purge probably resulted in a lift of the avg IQ and its legacy for generations. not in particular the jewish, but what he referred to as the lame and weak etc etc.

china has a history of similar purging but itd be a long bow to suggest that that's the reason.

You're trying to get around the problem by limiting the population to individual nations.  100 is intended to be the world average (or more precisely, the average for everyone who ever has or ever will take the test), not the individual average for every population tested, no matter how relatively small the sample size.   

That's like giving a class of students in school A a math test of 50 questions, and if the mean number answered correctly is 40, assiging a value of "100" to 40 questions answered correctly since it is the mean, then creating a normal distributin around that number.  You then give the same test to students in school B, and they score a mean of only 19 questions answered correctly.  By your logic, you would then assign a value of "100" to 19 questions answered correctly, and create a normal distribution, and then argue that both schools are equally intelligent, since they both have the same number of students at 100, the same number at 110, the same number at 90, etc.  Obviously, that's not the case, though, since the students at school B can only solve 19 math problems out of 50, while the students at school A can solve 40.

You could argue flaws in the test all you want, since it doesn't back up the "politically correct" view of the world, but the real-world success (or lack thereof) in populations who score very low on the test seems to back up its validity.

[chester_bbb]

Good brains, horrid physical genetics.

This coming from you. You look like a pile of burning dogshit.

[chester_bbb]

Well, in summation, whether they are smarter or not, they still have not learned basics like feeding their countrymen.

This speaks volumes, more so than the pissing contest as to who has the highest IQ

And your countrymen have?

[chester_bbb]

Ask John McCain. 

Hey he was the one bombing women and children.

[dr.chimps]

C'mon...  George Washington Carver invented the peanut, you know. 

And if it wasn't for Edward "Skippy" Williamson and Frederick "Jif" Armstrong -two white men! - he'd be famous today!   

/too obscure?

[chester_bbb]

Kind of hard to fill a month with people who didn't exist. 

Jewypedia giving in to revisionist agendas?  No way. 

Hey Matt C got any more pics of your sister?

[Big_Tymer]

the only reason blacks are 'better' at sports is because its all they do.  they dont study for tests or do homework like white/asian kids so they can get into a college, instead they stay outside all day playing basketball.

when they dont make it to the pros they have nothing else to fall back on, and you know the rest.