Author Topic: was twin peaks that good  (Read 955 times)

Bluto

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33175
  • Well?
was twin peaks that good
« on: May 15, 2008, 04:51:42 PM »
i watched that shit

not all of it

starting out normal as i can remember

then it got fucking weird

now everybody seems to love that weirdness and it's rated 9,5/10 om imdb

was it that good
Z

BroadStreetBruiser

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8574
  • "In Falcon We Trust"
Re: was twin peaks that good
« Reply #1 on: May 16, 2008, 04:23:04 PM »
it was the first of it's kind.
$

Bluto

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33175
  • Well?
Re: was twin peaks that good
« Reply #2 on: May 17, 2008, 03:40:21 AM »
but would it still be good today
Z

Desolate

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4868
  • I dream of Gods
Re: was twin peaks that good
« Reply #3 on: May 18, 2008, 03:05:51 AM »
No. It didn't succeed then either.

People have no patience. They claim that they want quality shows, but then when they get one, LOST for example, they complain that they aren't given the answers fast enough.

It's a joke.

Hedgehog

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19466
  • It Rubs The Lotion On Its Skin.
Re: was twin peaks that good
« Reply #4 on: May 18, 2008, 03:25:39 AM »
i watched that shit

not all of it

starting out normal as i can remember

then it got fucking weird

now everybody seems to love that weirdness and it's rated 9,5/10 om imdb

was it that good


First season was awesome.

And I gotta disagree with you slightly, what people usually say is that Twin Peaks lost its edge after awhile.
As empty as paradise