Author Topic: Appease vs. negotiate - let's settle this shit once and for all  (Read 792 times)

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Appease: To GIVE the enemy something to hope he'll stop.  See 1939, when Neville gave half of czech to Hitler so he wouldn't take the other half.

Negotiate: To DISCUSS issues with nations to deter or encourage certain behavior.


Obama would like to NEGOTIATE with terror states.  Just as Bush did - with N. Korea as they seek WMD, and with Libya, who Bush himself classified as a terrorist state, then thru quiet backdoor negotiations reached an agreement.  Many people also forget that even AFTER we labeled IRAN a terror state, we STILL negotiated with them for terms of Iraqi OIL and security issues.


Obama doesn't want to give the terror states ANYTHING. Just talk, to try to reach agreement.  Obviously strength alone isn't stopping them from blowing shit up in iraq, right?  Why not talk with them, just as Bush has talked with terror states.


You'll notice a lot of pundits saying "Obama is an appeaser!" but he doesn't want to give them a thing.  He just wants to talk, as Bush does.  People who say this are ignorant, and I just demonstrated why.


Decker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5782
Re: Appease vs. negotiate - let's settle this shit once and for all
« Reply #1 on: May 16, 2008, 07:11:24 AM »
That's a pretty good explanation.

Foreign policy losers like Bush and McCain eliminate from the start any attempt to negotiate with our enemies. 

To take negotiations off the table leaves confrontation as the only tool in the box. 

It's funny how Bush can state that he wants no options taken off the table (read nuclear) when dealing with Iran...except for negotiations.

Reagan negotiated with the Russians.

Bush's negotiations:

"I was able to get a sense of his soul (Vlad 'the impaler' Putin), a man deeply committed to his country and the best interests of his country," Bush declared after their 2001 visit.








240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Appease vs. negotiate - let's settle this shit once and for all
« Reply #2 on: May 16, 2008, 07:19:54 AM »
EVERYBODY negotiates.

Reagan negotiated with USSR even as they droped baby mines onto playgrounds all over the world.  Bush2 negotiated with iraq, iran, and NK even after he labeled them terror groups.  He negotiated with Libya, who he called a terror state.  Only when negoations were successful did he admit they were taking place ;)  So when he says "The US DOES NOT negotiate with terror states!" - that is an outright lie.  We do, and we should.  And to say obama is an appeaser (who actually gives something to terrorists), well it insults the intelligence of you, my friend.


What we are seeing is a coordinated effort - mccain and bush are doing it with complementary statements in times intervals - to make obama look soft on terror.    Voters should be aware that Obama is actually MORE of a hawk than mccain on some things.  Obama wants to walk right into pakistan and kill bin laden.  Mccain would rather try and let pakistan do it, after they've failed for 6 years.

Bindare_Dundat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12227
  • KILL CENTRAL BANKS, BUY BITCOIN.
Re: Appease vs. negotiate - let's settle this shit once and for all
« Reply #3 on: May 16, 2008, 06:26:58 PM »
There isn't going to be a choice but to negotiate. How much longer you think this dominance around the world can last? Somethings gonna give soon. Money or moral issues will finally pull the plug on this and the only thing left to offer will be negotiations.

War-Horse

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6490
Re: Appease vs. negotiate - let's settle this shit once and for all
« Reply #4 on: May 16, 2008, 06:59:27 PM »
There isn't going to be a choice but to negotiate. How much longer you think this dominance around the world can last? Somethings gonna give soon. Money or moral issues will finally pull the plug on this and the only thing left to offer will be negotiations.



Exactly.  Russia or china may tell us to STFU.  and we will.     

They arent a defenseless farming community like Iraq was. 

 Bush was only a bully to the lil nerd he knew he could take.....he's a pussy when push comes to shove, as 240 has shown with NKorea, and others.

Tre

  • Expert
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16549
  • "What you don't have is a career."
Re: Appease vs. negotiate - let's settle this shit once and for all
« Reply #5 on: May 16, 2008, 07:21:53 PM »

Give Israel to the Arabs and give my Jewish friends Utah, Nevada, and New Mexico. 

Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31866
Re: Appease vs. negotiate - let's settle this shit once and for all
« Reply #6 on: May 16, 2008, 07:34:41 PM »
well said 240

Tre

  • Expert
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16549
  • "What you don't have is a career."
Re: Appease vs. negotiate - let's settle this shit once and for all
« Reply #7 on: May 16, 2008, 07:43:52 PM »
There isn't going to be a choice but to negotiate. How much longer you think this dominance around the world can last? Somethings gonna give soon. Money or moral issues will finally pull the plug on this and the only thing left to offer will be negotiations.

The Asians have taken our jobs and the Arabs are now taking our money. 

Working together, they will cripple us within 150 years.