Author Topic: Cutler '01 vs Cutler '07 (Read 4626 times)

donrhummy · « **on:** May 16, 2008, 10:38:29 PM »

He was bigger and more ripped in 01 (even in an out of focus picture

)!

Matt C · « **Reply #1 on:** May 17, 2008, 12:20:39 AM »

I would tend to agree, although the tan may play a role.

marcus · « **Reply #2 on:** May 17, 2008, 12:24:18 AM »

All Palumboism.

Mobil · « **Reply #3 on:** May 17, 2008, 12:25:11 AM »

nope he did look better back then....he had the ability to get dry... maybe his kidneys are shot now

marcus · « **Reply #4 on:** May 17, 2008, 12:28:55 AM »

Quote from: Mobil on May 17, 2008, 12:25:11 AM

nope he did look better back then....he had the ability to get dry... maybe his kidneys are shot now

Awesome Michael Lockett leg symmetry.

Mobil · « **Reply #5 on:** May 17, 2008, 12:30:40 AM »

Quote from: marcus on May 17, 2008, 12:28:55 AM

Awesome Michael Lockett leg symmetry.

coleman lacks the genes to have striations in this quads.. jay has them... show me one pic of coleman with striations in his quads.... not veins... but striations... big difference.

Meso_z · « **Reply #6 on:** May 17, 2008, 12:58:18 AM »

Quote from: Mobil on May 17, 2008, 12:30:40 AM

coleman lacks the genes to have striations in this quads.. jay has them... show me one pic of coleman with striations in his quads.... not veins... but striations... big difference.

bizzy · « **Reply #7 on:** May 17, 2008, 01:03:47 AM »

There are probably better pics but light
striations on both sides of left leg.

Jeffro · « **Reply #8 on:** May 17, 2008, 01:11:57 AM »

Why would he claim that Coleman's quads didnt have striations?

Brutal_1 · « **Reply #9 on:** May 17, 2008, 05:14:49 AM »

Quote from: Mobil on May 17, 2008, 12:30:40 AM

coleman lacks the genes to have striations in this quads.. jay has them... show me one pic of coleman with striations in his quads.... not veins... but striations... big difference.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #10 on:** May 17, 2008, 05:17:47 AM »

Quote from: bizzy on May 17, 2008, 01:03:47 AM

There are probably better pics but light
striations on both sides of left leg.

The bigger he got the striations went away .

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #11 on:** May 17, 2008, 05:19:11 AM »

Quote from: donrhummy on May 16, 2008, 10:38:29 PM

He was bigger and more ripped in 01 (even in an out of focus picture )!

He was NOT bigger in 01 he was lighter and better conditioned , his showing in 2001 easily beats 2007

shootfighter1 · « **Reply #12 on:** May 17, 2008, 05:19:23 AM »

Wow, Coleman looked phenominal in 96'! I was a big Coleman fan until he added the excessive weight and ruined his abdomen.

webcake · « **Reply #13 on:** May 17, 2008, 05:23:09 AM »

Jay was 254lbs in 2001, im not sure what he was last year, but he is now 15lbs heavier or so $:-\$

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #14 on:** May 17, 2008, 05:24:07 AM »

Quote from: shootfighter1 on May 17, 2008, 05:19:23 AM

Wow, Coleman looked phenominal in 96'! I was a big Coleman fan until he added the excessive weight and ruined his abdomen.

He did look really good in 1996 he was 250 pounds and in that contest was sharp as hell

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #15 on:** May 17, 2008, 05:26:07 AM »

Quote from: webcke on May 17, 2008, 05:23:09 AM

Jay was 254lbs in 2001, im not sure what he was last year, but he is now 15lbs heavier or so $:-\$

I think he was 274 pounds in 07 but he looked leaps & bounds better in 01

m8 · « **Reply #16 on:** May 17, 2008, 05:26:42 AM »

All gym lighting.

ANAL DISCHARGE · « **Reply #17 on:** May 17, 2008, 08:47:32 AM »

Interesting how good Ronnie looked back then. Ripped, good obliques, nice lower pec line. About the time he used to get soundly beaten by Yates, Levrone et al. Ronnie gradually lost those finer aspects to his physique after 96-98.

donrhummy · « **Reply #18 on:** May 17, 2008, 09:22:16 AM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on May 17, 2008, 05:19:11 AM

He was NOT bigger in 01 he was lighter and better conditioned , his showing in 2001 easily beats 2007

His head size is the same (actually a tad bigger in the '07 pic) yet his shoulder, pec, bicep and leg muscles are BIGGER. If the head matches (and actually the '07 head is just slightly bigger) then it means you're actually comparing his actual body size.