Author Topic: 1999 Mr Olympia  (Read 26966 times)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83299
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 1999 Mr Olympia
« Reply #75 on: May 20, 2008, 02:34:01 PM »
Vast superiority in quad cuts this statement besides being flat-out wrong is a gross overstatement and very ignorant , his quads bigger in 99 ? sure more cut? NO just as cut sure more so NO and I love how all you do is claim they're more cut with the explanation or detailed analysis and to boot you came to this conclusion using the mots pathetic strawman comparison of a shit YouTube screencap compared to a DVD one lol pathetic


Hulkster = fail  ;)

quads same as 98 but bigger

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 1999 Mr Olympia
« Reply #76 on: May 20, 2008, 02:36:42 PM »
Vast superiority in quad cuts this statement besides being flat-out wrong is a gross overstatement and very ignorant , his quads bigger in 99 ? sure more cut? NO just as cut sure more so NO and I love how all you do is claim they're more cut with the explanation or detailed analysis and to boot you came to this conclusion using the mots pathetic strawman comparison of a shit YouTube screencap compared to a DVD one lol pathetic


Hulkster = fail  ;)

quads same as 98 but bigger

show me a shot of his quads that look anything like this in 98

otherwise, shut the fuck up.


even Lonnie Teper specifically mentioned his new found quad cuts in his ironman review of the contest.



Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 1999 Mr Olympia
« Reply #77 on: May 20, 2008, 02:38:13 PM »
Quote
I love how all you do is claim they're more cut with the explanation or detailed analysis

you can plainly see they are more cut moron.

you don't need a 'detailed analysis" ::)

jesus christ you are stupid. ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 1999 Mr Olympia
« Reply #78 on: May 20, 2008, 02:38:56 PM »
Quote
pathetic strawman comparison of a shit YouTube screencap compared to a DVD one lol pathetic

shit man you will come up with any possible excuse won't you?

 ::) :-\
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83299
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 1999 Mr Olympia
« Reply #79 on: May 20, 2008, 02:42:19 PM »
show me a shot of his quads that look anything like this in 98

otherwise, shut the fuck up.


even Lonnie Teper specifically mentioned his new found quad cuts in his ironman review of the contest.





lol reduced to profanity? lol how unbecoming

Peter McGough

review of mr. olympia 1999, january 2000, page  90:

257 pounds, a good seven pounds heavier than last year and the clear winner, ALTHOUGH NOT AS BONE DRY OR AS ROCK HARD IN 98.  In comparison to 98, his thighs are enourmous with a greater sweep and his front delts have improved; plus the pec anomaly (gyno) is no longer present.

his thighs are enourmous with a greater sweep

NO where does it say ' his quads are vastly more cut than 98 ' because they weren't bigger sure , more cut  ::) NO

Hulkster = ignorant  ;)


Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 1999 Mr Olympia
« Reply #80 on: May 20, 2008, 02:45:09 PM »
lol reduced to profanity? lol how unbecoming

Peter McGough

review of mr. olympia 1999, january 2000, page  90:

257 pounds, a good seven pounds heavier than last year and the clear winner, ALTHOUGH NOT AS BONE DRY OR AS ROCK HARD IN 98.  In comparison to 98, his thighs are enourmous with a greater sweep and his front delts have improved; plus the pec anomaly (gyno) is no longer present.

his thighs are enourmous with a greater sweep

NO where does it say ' his quads are vastly more cut than 98 ' because they weren't bigger sure , more cut  ::) NO

Hulkster = ignorant  ;)



I said Lonnie Teper, not Peter McGough you illiterate moron. ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83299
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 1999 Mr Olympia
« Reply #81 on: May 20, 2008, 02:45:44 PM »
shit man you will come up with any possible excuse won't you?

 ::) :-\

thats an excuse? LMMFAO the shit you post is pathetic and you know it because thats exactly why you posted it , you were notorious for this in other threads it shows your ignorance and fear and your level of desperation

quads exactly the same as 98 just bigger

Hulkster = loser

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 1999 Mr Olympia
« Reply #82 on: May 20, 2008, 02:46:07 PM »
still waiting on that 98 quad shot ND ::).

something tells me I will be waiting FOREVER

 ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

BlueDevil

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1117
Re: 1999 Mr Olympia
« Reply #83 on: May 20, 2008, 02:46:58 PM »

excellent

more thigh stories please

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83299
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 1999 Mr Olympia
« Reply #84 on: May 20, 2008, 02:47:34 PM »
I said Lonnie Teper, not Peter McGough you illiterate moron. ::)

I know what you said moron and you have most certainly LIED and made up quotes before ( see Shawn Ray  ;) ) I don't trust anything you type because you're not above lying to ' prove ' your point , you're also not above knowingly using photoshopped pics and heavily slanted ' comparisons '

Hulkster = pathetic  ;)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83299
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 1999 Mr Olympia
« Reply #85 on: May 20, 2008, 02:48:41 PM »
still waiting on that 98 quad shot ND ::).

something tells me I will be waiting FOREVER

 ::)

Hulkster = liar

I post side-by-side comparisons from 98/99 same exactly ammount of ' cuts ' as you call them

Hulkster = owned  ;)

CigaretteMan

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 678
  • Yum, yum, give me some!
Re: 1999 Mr Olympia
« Reply #86 on: May 20, 2008, 02:49:23 PM »
  Ha ha...it is hilarious to see Hulkster and the other guy going at it ad infinitum. These guys have battled each other for something like 40,000 posts over years. There is a new program by Tito Ortiz where they allow people who are antagonists and hate each other to fight inside a ring to settle their differences once and for all. Maybe it's time for that? ;D

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: 1999 Mr Olympia
« Reply #87 on: May 20, 2008, 02:50:13 PM »

Hulkster = loser

The name calling she's long been known for when losing badly's infantile, to quote gh15's apt appraisal. Just another deflection to go with lameass excuses about photoshop, lighting, angles, etc.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83299
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 1999 Mr Olympia
« Reply #88 on: May 20, 2008, 02:50:35 PM »
  Ha ha...it is hilarious to see Hulkster and the other guy going at it ad infinitum. These guys have battled each other for something like 40,000 posts over years. There is a new program by Tito Ortiz where they allow people who are antagonists and hate each other to fight inside a ring to settle their differences once and for all. Maybe it's time for that? ;D

Hulkster = KTFO

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83299
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 1999 Mr Olympia
« Reply #89 on: May 20, 2008, 02:51:18 PM »
The name calling you're known to resort to when losing badly's infantile, to quote gh15's apt appraisal.

stick to the topic please

pumpster = troll  ;)

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: 1999 Mr Olympia
« Reply #90 on: May 20, 2008, 02:51:43 PM »
stick to the topic please

pumpster = troll  ;)


ND vindictive name-calling letch hahahaha point made.

ND only sticks to the topic on her own threads, otherwise the threads are hijacked.

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 1999 Mr Olympia
« Reply #91 on: May 20, 2008, 02:52:50 PM »
more shots of quad cuts never seen in 1998:
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83299
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 1999 Mr Olympia
« Reply #92 on: May 20, 2008, 02:53:46 PM »
Ronnie looked great at the 99 Olympia to bad he couldn't maintain that same rock hard and bone dry look of 1998 , he did return to that optimum conditioning in 2001 when he dropped weight he looks so much better when his conditioning is spot-on

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: 1999 Mr Olympia
« Reply #93 on: May 20, 2008, 02:57:34 PM »
Ronnie looked great at the 99 Olympia to bad he couldn't maintain that same rock hard and bone dry look of 1998 , he did return to that optimum conditioning in 2001 when he dropped weight he looks so much better when his conditioning is spot-on


He looks great seen here in top condition dominating the keg, as others have pointed out lol

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83299
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 1999 Mr Olympia
« Reply #94 on: May 20, 2008, 03:10:55 PM »
Ronnie 98 blows 99 out of the water in terms of that bone dry & rock hard look

CigaretteMan

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 678
  • Yum, yum, give me some!
Re: 1999 Mr Olympia
« Reply #95 on: May 20, 2008, 03:16:43 PM »
  Ronnie at the 1999 Olympia is vastly overrated. Ronnie's strengh is his incredible muscle definition, striations and vascularity, all of which he had more at the 98 Olympia and at the 1996 Canada Pro Cup. Ronnie becomes just another big guy when he plays the size game, losing that which settles him apart from other bodybuilders. Also, Ronnie has a genetic tendency towards addominal distension, which becomes worse as he becomes heavier, so he always better at a lighter weight.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83299
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 1999 Mr Olympia
« Reply #96 on: May 20, 2008, 03:21:10 PM »
  Ronnie at the 1999 Olympia is vastly overrated. Ronnie's strengh is his incredible muscle definition, striations and vascularity, all of which he had more at the 98 Olympia and at the 1996 Canada Pro Cup. Ronnie becomes just another big guy when he plays the size game, losing that which settles him apart from other bodybuilders. Also, Ronnie has a genetic tendency towards addominal distension, which becomes worse as he becomes heavier, so he always better at a lighter weight.

Great post ! which is why everyone in the know when speaking of Ronnie's best showings 1999 Mr Olympia doesn't come up , its 98 or 2001 and to some 2003 but at least the ones who claim 2003 don't have the balls to type he's just as hard or dry as 98


Ex Coelis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8075
Re: 1999 Mr Olympia
« Reply #97 on: May 20, 2008, 03:38:43 PM »
the kind of detail and separation Doz and coy can only dream of


Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 1999 Mr Olympia
« Reply #98 on: May 20, 2008, 04:21:02 PM »
the kind of detail and separation Doz and coy can only dream of



yes and ND take note:

its NOT from the 98 olympia, and for good reason!
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 1999 Mr Olympia
« Reply #99 on: May 20, 2008, 04:25:28 PM »
Ronnie 98 blows 99 out of the water in terms of that bone dry & rock hard look

are you dumb or just stupid? ::)

honestly ND why are you arguing yet another argument where visual reality (and eyewitness testimony from people like ronnie himself) prove you wrong?

tell us:

98 O vs 99 O

I thought he was supposed to be much better in 98 ??? LOL ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away