1999 Mr Olympia

[NarcissisticDeity]

There are more people than people think that believe 1999 was his best.

Comments from youtube about Ronnie @ the 1999 Olympia.
The + signs indicate the number of people taking the time to agree with the comment.

boy...ronnie looked perfect during this time.. +7
No one will ever achieve such a physique!This is natural phenomenon! +7
99olympia was Ronnie's best shape in his career. +7
this was the best performance by the best bodybuilder ever... if he could have kept this form he could easily have beaten jay cutler the last 2 years +7
Best shape ever from RON +6
IMO, this is simplest the greatest physique ever presented onstage. his conditioning is unreal. +4
best physique ever presented. enough said +2
Coleman at is Best!! +13
Out of all the Olympias Ronnie won he was in his best condition. He still held the mass as well on top of it +2
RONNIES BEST +3
The BEST Olympia performance to date!
I never seen that kind of mass with such insanely deep cuts in my life. I thought he looked good in 2003....boy was I wrong. Wow....I'm almost speechless but yea...no one will ever look this good again. The combination of dense hard rock full ripped muscle on every inch of his body is just insane. +4
1999 was one of his best years. Ok he was 10-30lbs lighter, but sharp as a knife. +12
1999 truly was his best knife, so sharp and shredded that he indeed was beyond unbeatable that year, and no bloated gut. he just went overboard with mass in his later days. +3
wow. just wow. absolutely unreal. i used to think 2003 was his best year, but here, man, he is the greatest ever. +1
This was ronnies best year .. look at the great seperations and size .. just amazing + 1

Some comments from the site Hulkster was reffering to. This was several months ago so I'm
sure there are more now but here are a few.

1. In my mind ,thats Ronnies best ever shape. 1999
2. i agree.. that was a great physique alright...
3. the 99 RC is the best physique to ever step onstage
4. 99= Ronnies best ever
5. Thank you! I thought i was the only one who liked the 99' Coleman over the 03' one.
6. I agree with you FLEX 99 he looked the best IMO.
7. That physique is untouchable
8. 99 better than 03, untoucable
9. Ronnie's best ever
10. theres not a soul on this planet that could beat his shape in 99
11. nothings gonna beat his physique from the 1999 O.
12. 99-the best ever ronnie
13. 99 Ronnie Coleman... thge greatest EVER!!! COLEMAN 1999>ANYBODY!!!

I'll bet like you & Hulkster NONE of these people were actually there their opinions like your own are limited by inaccurate means , ignorance to what great conditioning is & isn't , for them to make an opinion that carried any weight they'd have to be there in 98 & 99 and even then thats limited to knowledge , distance from the stage etc

the people who count are the professionals and NOT one of the say Ronnie's best showing was 1999 for a very good reason , if supposedly his conditioning was almost the same every professional would consider 1999 his best showing because he was 257 pounds 13 pounds heavier than 2001 and just as hard & dry and guess what he's NOT just as hard & just as dry this coming from professionals , eyewitnesses and the man HIMSELF sorry kids

2001 kicks 1999's ass for a very good reason 

[ANAL DISCHARGE]

Coleman's pathetic collapsing on stage showed such a lack of dignity and composure. 

[Hulkster]

hey ND, Ronnie Coleman WAS THERE and said he was a 'little bit sharper'

you can't win ND. eyewitness testimony and overwhelming visuals own your silly argument.

ps love how you still pick and choose which Ronnie Coleman quotes to believe LOL

you are really pathetic..

[Hulkster]

I'll bet like you & Hulkster NONE of these people were actually there their opinions like your own are limited by inaccurate means , ignorance to what great conditioning is & isn't , for them to make an opinion that carried any weight they'd have to be there in 98 & 99 and even then thats limited to knowledge , distance from the stage etc

the people who count are the professionals and NOT one of the say Ronnie's best showing was 1999 for a very good reason , if supposedly his conditioning was almost the same every professional would consider 1999 his best showing because he was 257 pounds 13 pounds heavier than 2001 and just as hard & dry and guess what he's NOT just as hard & just as dry this coming from professionals , eyewitnesses and the man HIMSELF sorry kids

2001 kicks 1999's ass for a very good reason 

LOL why are you all of a sudden comparing 2001 AC to 99 Olympia?

god damn you can see why you are uneducated..

we are addressing one debate and you are clouding it up with a completely different one..

 

ps McGough feels that Ronnie's 99 olympia win 'advanced the sport'

not 98. and for good reason.

never forget that.

leave 2001 out of this.

we are not comparing 2001 AC to 99.

we comparing 98 to 99 McD.

[Hulkster]

McD is getting owned.

[d0nny2600]

Epic triple post melt! Only joking!

[pumpster]

Coleman's pathetic collapsing on stage showed such a lack of dignity and composure. 

This didn't look too good either genius lol

[NarcissisticDeity]

LOL why are you all of a sudden comparing 2001 AC to 99 Olympia?

god damn you can see why you are uneducated..

we are addressing one debate and you are clouding it up with a completely different one..

 

ps McGough feels that Ronnie's 99 olympia win 'advanced the sport'

not 98. and for good reason.

never forget that.

leave 2001 out of this.

we are not comparing 2001 AC to 99.

we comparing 98 to 99 McD.

We're talking about Ronnie's best showing and why and it isn't 1999 for a reason , because his conditioning was much better in 1998 and 2001 and if you were right ( entertaining your stupidity ) 1999 would be Ronnie's best showing because................. ...he would be 14 pounds heavier than 2001 with equal conditioning but dummy here is the point , Ronnie's conditioning was NOT comparable in 1999 to , 1998 or 2001 HENCE its not his best showing

Proven Fact


The general consensus of expert bodybuilding opinion is...................... ...2001 or 1998 is Ronnie's best showings .....................bec ause..............he lacked NOTHING his size & conditioning were perfect

Hulkster = dummy 

[NarcissisticDeity]

did u miss the part where i said i was in new york in 98 and las vegas in 99? and nd said ronnie said 98 was his best o because he was better conditioned and again he was , i was there and it was clear he was drier and denser in 98 and you are only goin by pics which mean nothin cuase a group of us from my gym went and we all took pics and was surprised to see after we developed them that they didnt look like real life so goin by pics mean nothin

so unless you were there in row 3 like me in 98 n 99 your opinion means nothin kid and just to let you know im a huge ronnie fan i seen him from the beginin and always knew he would do damage if he got his act together , so keep tyin to act like you know what your talkin bout because nd is pretty much on the money

nd were you there in 98 n 99?

Great post !
Oh he didn't miss it lol he just can't respond to it he's completely owned he can't counter your points he wasn't there lol he sits at home on his computer think he knows what he's talking about. its great to see someone who was actually there shutting this idiot down on all of his ignorant ' points ' and I wasn't there at either contest and neither was dummy Hulkster

Hulkster = owned in grand fashion by someone who was there for both contests lol

[Hulkster]

did u miss the part where i said i was in new york in 98 and las vegas in 99? and nd said ronnie said 98 was his best o because he was better conditioned and again he was , i was there and it was clear he was drier and denser in 98 and you are only goin by pics which mean nothin cuase a group of us from my gym went and we all took pics and was surprised to see after we developed them that they didnt look like real life so goin by pics mean nothin

so unless you were there in row 3 like me in 98 n 99 your opinion means nothin kid and just to let you know im a huge ronnie fan i seen him from the beginin and always knew he would do damage if he got his act together , so keep tyin to act like you know what your talkin bout because nd is pretty much on the money

nd were you there in 98 n 99?

Ronnie Coleman was there:

"I was almost 15 pounds bigger and a little bit sharper"


LOL

[Hulkster]

ND, do you claim to know more than Ronnie Coleman?

because that is what you are saying LOL

I love turning your own stupid arguments against you.

its so much fun

[Hulkster]

It doesn't matter if Ronnie did say it after the fact he could've been caught up in the moment etc

or, he could have been spot on..

 

the excuses continue..

[NarcissisticDeity]

Ronnie Coleman was there:

"I was almost 15 pounds bigger and a little bit sharper"


LOL

whoa meltdown lol I love when you get your ass kicked by someone who was actually there you go on this multiple post meltdown lol its so predictable

Natural Ironman's comments are right in line with other eyewitnesses , like Ronnie who in late 2007 has gone on record as saying 1998 Olympia was his best because his conditioning was spot-on

and these other comments lol

Hulkster's M.O. when confronted with facts from eyewitnesses , deny , deny , deny ......meltdown ....deny , deny , deny lol

I'm lovin it 

[Hulkster]

ND, I think you missed the part about Ronnie being there, other magazine reviewers being there (the professionals, remember? ) all saying Ronnie was sharper AND all the visuals.

you missed all that too..

 

honestly, what do you have?

one quote contradicted by many others.

big fucking deal.

you have no visuals to corroborate any of it.

but you are too stupid to realize this..

 

[Hulkster]

I think Ronnie knows more than the Natural Ironman..

and you.

and his opinion is verified by the visuals..

yours isn't.

never forget that.

[NarcissisticDeity]

ND, I think you missed the part about Ronnie being there, other magazine reviewers being there (the professionals, remember? ) all saying Ronnie was sharper AND all the visuals.

you missed all that too..

 

honestly, what do you have?

one quote contradicted by many others.

big fucking deal.

you have no visuals to corroborate any of it.

but you are too stupid to realize this..

 

Again Ronnie was there and in 2007 when asked which was his best Olympia he said..............1998.. ........................ ...because.............. .............his conditioning was spot-on which means................... ......his conditioning 1999 was NOT spot-on.....................owned 

[Hulkster]

Hulkster's M.O. when confronted with facts from eyewitnesses

Ronnie was an eyewitness and he said he was sharper in 99.

nothing you can say will change this, yet you go on and one about other quotes like this one doesn't matter LOL

you are truly an act of sheer stupidity.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Ronnie was an eyewitness and he said he was sharper in 99.

nothing you can say will change this, yet you go on and one about other quotes like this one doesn't matter LOL

you are truly an act of sheer stupidity.

Again no he didn't in fact he said in 2007 his conditioning was better in 1998 and thats why he picked it as his best Olympia showing

NO ONE agree with you , eyewitnesses , professionals , Ronnie you have nothing as usual .

[Hulkster]

NO ONE agree with you , eyewitnesses , professionals , Ronnie you have nothing as usual .

well, Ronnie is quoted as agreeing with me.

so you are fucked.

oh, and all the visuals agree too.

so you are even more fucked.

all ND has is a contradicted quote LOL

must be hard.

[NarcissisticDeity]

well, Ronnie is quoted as agreeing with me.

so you are fucked.

oh, and all the visuals agree too.

so you are even more fucked.

all ND has is a contradicted quote LOL

must be hard.

No he doesn't you're a liar showing me a quote post 2007 where Ronnie says he was better conditioned in 1999 please do 

Hulkster= frustrated

[Hulkster]

No he doesn't you're a liar showing me a quote post 2007 where Ronnie says he was better conditioned in 1999 please do 

Hulkster= frustrated

LOL what the fuck does 'post 2007' have to do with it?

 

you know how owned you are given that we could pull the same bullshit with all the quotes you have been shoving down our throats for the last two years?

 


here is a little lesson for you: ronnie's opinion the day after is going to be a hell of a lot more accurate than his foggy recollection 10 years later..

only a moron would think other wise.

sharper = sharper.

period.

[Hulkster]

ps I am a liar? can't accept what Ronnie said?

here is the fucking article McD:

http://www.dennisbweis.com/Articles/Colman.html

read it and die. lol

[NarcissisticDeity]

LOL what the fuck does 'post 2007' have to do with it?

 

you know how owned you are given that you pull this shit with all the quotes you have been shoving down our throats for the last two years?

 


here is a little lesson for you: ronnie's opinion the day after is going to be a hell of a lot more accurate than his foggy recollection 10 years later..

only a moron would think other wise.

sharper = sharper.

period.

Sorry wrong , thanks for playing the man choose which was his best Olympia and why and it was 1998

and I don't any quote you claim anyway you have LIED before about quotes , remember the Shawn Ray quote you made up and I exposed you on? I don't trust anything you type because you are known to lie and use photoshopped pics you're not above such nonsense

Again if as you claim Ronnie was just as hard & dry in 1999 as he was in 1998/2001 it would be considered his best showing ever and its NOT for that reason


Hulkster = fail

[NarcissisticDeity]

ps I am a liar? can't accept what Ronnie said?

here is the fucking article McD:

http://www.dennisbweis.com/Articles/Colman.html

read it and die. lol

2007 PBW Ronnie admits his best Olympia is 1998 and why? he's better conditioned thats a fact jack. 

[NarcissisticDeity]

Peter McGough