Author Topic: Is this the perfect male body? (Read 11732 times)

Camel Jockey · « **Reply #25 on:** May 21, 2008, 10:16:35 AM »

Quote from: candidizzle on May 21, 2008, 10:10:25 AM

so are you saying you DONT have pictures of this guy half naked plastered on the wall across from your toilet seat?

LOL just fucking wit you

i think this thread is played out. obviously ronnie coleman and markus ruhl and dorian yates are NOT what women want in a man. and yes it obvious that as far as bodybuilders go bob paris's look is abotu as good as it gtes for slamming pussy; although i doubt he ever did slam any pussy himself, the queer. lol.

but bodybuiilding is not judged by a panel of 4 horny women its judged ~~by a panel of 4 horny men~~ on muscle size, conditioning, and aethetics.

Well put.

All these constant topics are kind of pointless. I mean we're all in agreement that leaner, smaller guys with certain facial features will get more pussy than supersized bodybuilders. However, this is totally missing the point as you pointed out.

candidizzle · « **Reply #26 on:** May 21, 2008, 10:18:14 AM »

as far as bodybuilding is cconcerned so far from what weve seen this is the perfect body

PANDAEMONIUM · « **Reply #27 on:** May 21, 2008, 10:18:25 AM »

THIS THREAD REEKS OF FAGGAGE

PRO Chemical · « **Reply #28 on:** May 22, 2008, 04:50:08 PM »

I hope not

Blockhead · « **Reply #29 on:** May 22, 2008, 04:54:35 PM »

Quote from: spinnis on May 21, 2008, 07:16:03 AM

This is.
And it works with the ladies,

I agree.

This thread has the potential to turn really gay really quick.

Karl Kox · « **Reply #30 on:** May 22, 2008, 05:11:13 PM »

Azn Muscle · « **Reply #31 on:** May 22, 2008, 05:39:17 PM »

Those male models are the "perfect male body" in terms of optimal pussy wrecking. I would probably say 8 or 9 out of 10 women would probably prefer those tiny tits even when compared to an aesthetic bodybuilder like Bob Paris. Even Paris would probably be considered "too big" even though when compared to mass monsters like coleman, ruhl, etc he is a tiny tit. Thats just how society in the US these days is, they promote the "health look". It seems like the tiny tit whose workout routine is abs and arms every other day are the ones wrecking the most pussy, despite what the majority of die hard 240lb 25% bf trailer park resident getbigger's believe. A lot of you "powerlifter" folk laugh at these tiny tits, but the truth is these guys destroy more high quality pussy on a daily basis then you could even fathom. Sucks but its the truth.

candidizzle · « **Reply #32 on:** May 22, 2008, 05:43:23 PM »

maybe we should have a seperate board to talk about nutrition, training, drugs, gossip...all about "building a pussy wrecking machine"... as it seems most people here just aspire to to that ... not anything worthy of the stage

bigmikecox · « **Reply #33 on:** May 22, 2008, 05:44:09 PM »

Quote from: m8 on May 21, 2008, 07:09:32 AM

This a a very gay thread

The Master · « **Reply #34 on:** May 22, 2008, 05:46:20 PM »

Quote from: bigmikecox on May 22, 2008, 05:44:09 PM

This a a very gay thread

This comes from a man that spends his time flexing his roided body in front of other men onstage in a thong.

m8 · « **Reply #35 on:** May 22, 2008, 05:47:02 PM »

Quote from: bigmikecox on May 22, 2008, 05:44:09 PM

This a a very gay thread

False.
In fact, BayGBM didn't even post in it.

candidizzle · « **Reply #36 on:** May 22, 2008, 05:48:07 PM »

lol those physqiques are so attainable anybody here who wants to just get pussy has got it eassssyyyy

run 2 miles a day

2k cals a day mostly protein

train chest and biceps and abs three times a week

hahahahahaha

pussy wrecking here i come !!

3Dkiller · « **Reply #37 on:** May 22, 2008, 06:41:04 PM »

Quote from: PANDAEMONIUM on May 21, 2008, 10:18:25 AM

THIS THREAD REEKS OF FAGGAGE

yea i agree

_bruce_ · « **Reply #38 on:** May 22, 2008, 07:58:53 PM »

The lat development clearly is the first step to go from "pretty" to athletic, rugged or brute.
H-taper seems to gurantee that one stays within "normal" visual dimensions.

H = pussy wrecker
V = lonely getbigger

Regarding senoritas - if you've got more or less muscle than these "supermen" it sure won't make that much of a difference...
do chicks carry measuring taps with them in the clubs these days?

arce377 · « **Reply #39 on:** May 23, 2008, 12:22:11 AM »

marcus · « **Reply #40 on:** May 23, 2008, 01:38:07 AM »

Perfect.

jtsunami · « **Reply #41 on:** May 23, 2008, 02:00:14 AM »

Brad pitt in fight club had the perfect body to get girls.

kyomu · « **Reply #42 on:** May 23, 2008, 02:15:54 AM »

Quote from: affeman on May 21, 2008, 08:31:15 AM

I noticed that on many male models, Whalberg included. Basically all the have is abs, arms and chest. But they have no lats at all. Do you think that's intention? Do they even train back??

Obviously, you dont know how the bodybuilding going.
He just dont take "Relax" pose. And he is completely relaxing and tensing his abs only.
I have wide lat but when i dont pose and relax,my lat shows very little.
I bet this guy do lat pulldown too.

RZA · « **Reply #43 on:** May 23, 2008, 02:27:40 AM »

Sorry but I have to disagree here. Even when relaxed your lats should show a bit, at least your taper should be ovious. I have a few male models like this training at my gym and they don't mostly do abs, chest and arms; they ONLY do abs, chest and bis not even tris for most of them. Zero legs, zero back. Look at that guy's shoulders and traps: simply non-existant even "relaxed".

kyomu · « **Reply #44 on:** May 23, 2008, 02:36:22 AM »

Quote from: RZA on May 23, 2008, 02:27:40 AM

Sorry but I have to disagree here. Even when relaxed your lats should show a bit, at least your taper should be ovious. I have a few male models like this training at my gym and they don't mostly do abs, chest and arms; they ONLY do abs, chest and bis not even tris for most of them. Zero legs, zero back. Look at that guy's shoulders and traps: simply non-existant even "relaxed".

Mmmmm...I begin to agree with you.
But i saw many kids like this and they train everything. But of course, they dont have big muscle.So his lat is small too.
Or geneticaly, he has wide waist . but since he is thin,he dont look like?
I just want him to hit doble bi or lat spread to see if he trains back.

RZA · « **Reply #45 on:** May 23, 2008, 02:41:35 AM »

There's a very simple way to see if a guy trains (or more exactly trains "properly") his back when you look at them and it's not from the bulk, it's from the posture. Generally guys with pecs and a bit of anterior delts have their shoulders rotating ahead, creating the impression that they have kyphosis. If your back (and post-delts) are on par with your pecs, your posture should be pretty good. But most guys I see at the gym (and a lot of thin "healthy-look" ones) have that bad posture and chicken legs too.

danielson · « **Reply #46 on:** May 23, 2008, 02:56:23 AM »

Quote from: m8 on May 21, 2008, 07:09:32 AM

Anything bigger than that and people will think you are retarded or something. Plus really muscular people always seem to have bad gas, so I would say that build is pretty near perfect.

kyomu · « **Reply #47 on:** May 23, 2008, 03:01:46 AM »

Quote from: danielson on May 23, 2008, 02:56:23 AM

Anything bigger than that and people will think you are retarded or something. Plus really muscular people always seem to have bad gas, so I would say that build is pretty near perfect.

Right.

danielson · « **Reply #48 on:** May 23, 2008, 03:03:47 AM »

Quote from: kyomu on May 23, 2008, 03:01:46 AM

Right.

I knew you would agree with my Kyomu. I noticed you like to keep a boyish small physique as well, who the hell wants to be a big meathead.

DK II · « **Reply #49 on:** May 23, 2008, 03:08:48 AM »

Quote from: danielson on May 23, 2008, 03:03:47 AM

I knew you would agree with my Kyomu. I noticed you like to keep a boyish small physique as well, who the hell wants to be a big meathead.