Matt C's review of the Higher Power stack by BB.com!

[The Master]

This is true, and I know what you and the others are driving home.  But in this case, it isn't even a matter of being the few (customers), but rather the few (peanut gallery members) who are just libeling me on purpose.  If not this, they would perhaps take my YouTube clips as proof that I am involved in G4P or something equally low.

If it truly was the consensus (right or wrong), I would definitely be concerned.  As it is, it's just another attack on Matt C, and as I said, the board likes to attack everyone.

Enough about this. When will you buy Debussey a strawman suit?

[Matt C]

Soon Debussey!  I have to leave now (going for a panzerotti, an Italian specialty  ), but I will be back on later.

Cool,but the impression I get is that he beleives they are inferior.

I could be wrong about everything in my post,but somehow I doubt it.

Well, if everyone talking about me is telling the truth, then definitely that is the case.  But if you read my posts carefully you will see that it is not so.

For example, a radiologist can tell you that an increased number of radioisotopes are necessary for black men because they typically have bone that is more dense than that of white men. This isn't an issue of race, but rather of biology and science. The more dense the bone tissue is, the more pressure it can withstand from a muscle contraction. Might this play a role in athleticism?

Now this is just an observation.  If you want to read that as me suggesting all blacks are superior to whites athletically, you can read it like that, but I never said that and that is not my position.  But that is a good example of how things get misinterpreted on here.

[CQ]

In short, until you can actually quote something or give me some substance that I should be concerned about, yes.  BB.com and other people (let's call them "sane people") will just interpret this thread as an orchestrated attempt to ruin my relationship with them.

I acknowledge that the four you mentioned are smart.  But even then, I've asked you to actually quote what I've said here which is detrimental to my business and you cannot (by the way, Debussey is not speaking about me, but just in a broad context).  Instead you use the interpretation of my posts by members of the peanut gallery as examples of a liability.

People on here always do this to people who are making money in the industry and doing well - Bob and Vince Goodrum for example.

This reminds me of when Bob said he had access to customer information.  Then people actually e-mailed BB.com and complained about this.  Well, the reality is that the guys on BB.com come here to investigate, and they will not see what I wrote which actually verifies the libel you speak of.  Of COURSE BB.com reads this thread.  They will look at it as me just getting picked on again, me shrugging it off again, and the peanut gallery escalating it to even more perverse levels than normal.

You know, "making stuff up" isn't a high burden of proof - it won't work in the courts, and it won't work here.  Although you may be amazed at the raft of people in all areas of life actually do it.  Not only is it not effective, but it makes the person doing it lose credibility.  When the dust settles, not only will my relationship with BB.com be secure, but the harder the peanut gallery grasps at straws trying to turn them against one of their top affiliates, the more it will ultimately just reflect poorly on getbig and the credibility of the board, and not myself.

So for those intentionally seeking to harm my business relationships, be very careful.  You can only cry wolf so many times until the fellows at BB.com or elsewhere realize you are simply trying to be malicious.  In the end, if the day ever comes that I were to do something truly detrimental, the odds of you even being heard on the matter will be lower  (much like the boy who cried Dennis Wolf). 

In three years, I will be BB.com's #1 partner.

Since that post was blunt, and the arrogance in this thread is running rampant, I will join in.

I busted my ass nothing under 80 hours a week for many years. My sole owned companies are brick and mortar, I habitually employ double digit employees, I have been in business well over a decade, and have no business liabilities barring basic bills to be paid at the end of the month. Feel free to assume I am "not making money" and "doing well" [lol]. You would be very surprised if you knew me IRL.

Again, please consider actually being more business minded not proving superior intellect if you want to make mega cash. You are generally a nice guy, and I [seriously] do believe you are probably a genius, as your abilty to talk about various matters with extreme intelligence but you cannot understand a very basic point [don't piss off potential customers as you lose money] is normal for the genius types. Give them a 80 page math equation they can do it - ask them to apply common sense, they are stumped.

[IFBBwannaB]

Since that post was blunt, and the arrogance in this thread is running rampant, I will join in.

I busted my ass nothing under 80 hours a week for many years. My sole owned companies are brick and mortar, I habitually employ double digit employees, I have been in business well over a decade, and have no business liabilities barring basic bills to be paid at the end of the month. Feel free to assume I am "not making money" and "doing well" [lol]. You would be very surprised if you knew me IRL.

Again, please consider actually being more business minded not proving superior intellect if you want to make mega cash. You are generally a nice guy, and I [seriously] do believe you are probably a genius, as your abilty to talk about various matters with extreme intelligence but you cannot understand a very basic point [don't piss off potential customers as you lose money] is normal for the genius types. Give them a 80 page math equation they can do it - ask them to apply common sense, they are stumped.

You give him way too much credit.

[Matt C]

Since that post was blunt, and the arrogance in this thread is running rampant, I will join in.

I busted my ass nothing under 80 hours a week for many years. My sole owned companies are brick and mortar, I habitually employ double digit employees, I have been in business well over a decade, and have no business liabilities barring basic bills to be paid at the end of the month. Feel free to assume I am "not making money" and "doing well" [lol]. You would be very surprised if you knew me IRL.

Again, please consider actually being more business minded not proving superior intellect if you want to make mega cash. You are generally a nice guy, and I [seriously] do believe you are probably a genius, as your abilty to talk about various matters with extreme intelligence but you cannot understand a very basic point [don't piss off potential customers as you lose money] is normal for the genius types. Give them a 80 page math equation they can do it - ask them to apply common sense, they are stumped.

I get your point which you feel (rightfully so) that I overlooked for a while there.  But I'm coming back now by saying that there are no potential customers I'm pissing off really - just a bunch of peanut gallery members being jerks to me.  What you're saying is valid, I'm simply saying it really isn't the case here.  This is just an orchestrated attack on Matt C.  They come about every two weeks (give or take) if you haven't noticed. 

If I stop talking about any controversial issue at hand would you be willing to bet that the same members still try to ruin my business relationships?

[The Master]

What would Getbig be without good old MattCock?

Love ya man

[Matt C]

What would Getbig be without good old MattCock?

Love ya man

I'd give anything for the peanut gallery to stop being so mean to me.  Debussey, please get them to stop being mean to me.    Discuss.

hmm...

I think I know the solution to this.  Do you think a video of me beating the computer on chess.com on hard mode in under 60 seconds is in order?  Would you say that is the most appropriate solution here?

[Special Ed]

Mazi (pronounced MattC),
No one is hurting your relationship with BB.com except YOU. Take responsibility for your statements instead of blaming others for their 'interpretation'. You have in fact made a number of racist and anti-semitic posts here. Do you deny that? I can offer proof and evidence if you wish to continue your victimization and persecution charade.

You are following stadard protocol for outed racists:
1) Deny making racial remarks;
2) Deny holding those opinions;
3) Mask opinions under guise of "science" or "history";
4) Use 'racialist' or 'nationalist' to distinguish self;
5) Paint self as a victim of censorship or 'media conspiracy';
6) Insist that you are right despite a totality of evidence to the contrary.

PS. You cited Vince Goodrum as being a 'successful' guy. Please state your definition of success.

[The Master]

I'd give anything for the peanut gallery to stop being so mean to me.  Debussey, please get them to stop being mean to me.    Discuss.

hmm...

I think I know the solution to this.  Do you think a video of me beating the computer on chess.com on hard mode in under 60 seconds is in order?  Would you say that is the most appropriate solution here?

ROFL HAHAHA    

[wes]

And of course, you can link to a quote where I actually said this right? 

No I can`t,because as far as I know you never said this word for word,but your posts surely seem to imply this sentiment.

We can`t all be imagining racism coming through in your posts.

[The Master]

Mazi (pronounced MattC),
No one is hurting your relationship with BB.com except YOU. Take responsibility for your statements instead of blaming others for their 'interpretation'. You have in fact made a number of racist and anti-semitic posts here. Do you deny that? I can offer proof and evidence if you wish to continue your victimization and persecution charade.

You are following stadard protocol for outed racists:
1) Deny making racial remarks;
2) Deny holding those opinions;
3) Mask opinions under guise of "science" or "history";
4) Use 'racialist' or 'nationalist' to distinguish self;
5) Paint self as a victim of censorship or 'media conspiracy';
6) Insist that you are right despite a totality of evidence to the contrary.

PS. You cited Vince Goodrum as being a 'successful' guy. Please state your definition of success.

Stop being mean to MattCock He does not like it when people are being mean to him    

:

I'd give anything for the peanut gallery to stop being so mean to me.  Debussey, please get them to stop being mean to me.    Discuss.

[benz]

so, whats the current drama?

[candidizzle]

okay okay candidizzle will weigh in



pakistan should have the holy land

jews are on the whole smart people


rich people control the world, not any religion




ok done deal page over

[The Master]

rich people control the world, not any religion

Yes! Religion sucks and should never have anything to do with politics.

[candidizzle]

Yes! Religion sucks and should never have anything to do with politics.

where do laws come from ? (historicallY)

[The Master]

where do laws come from ? (historicallY)

Are you trying to subtily make an argument for having religious thought in politics instead of a rationally derived code of ethics that builds the basis for a secular gouvernment? If so, please stop.

[candidizzle]

Are you trying to subtily make an argument for having religious thought in politics instead of a rationally derived code of ethics that builds the basis for a secular gouvernment? If so, please stop.

where does a code of ethics come from ? 

[The Master]

where does a code of ethics come from ? 

Rational thought and the theory of maximization of utility. Not religious dogma

[Matt C]

Mazi (pronounced MattC),
No one is hurting your relationship with BB.com except YOU. Take responsibility for your statements instead of blaming others for their 'interpretation'. You have in fact made a number of racist and anti-semitic posts here. Do you deny that? I can offer proof and evidence if you wish to continue your victimization and persecution charade.

You are following stadard protocol for outed racists:
1) Deny making racial remarks;
2) Deny holding those opinions;
3) Mask opinions under guise of "science" or "history";
4) Use 'racialist' or 'nationalist' to distinguish self;
5) Paint self as a victim of censorship or 'media conspiracy';
6) Insist that you are right despite a totality of evidence to the contrary.

Anyone who holds any opinions contrary to prescribed politically correct dogma will be deemed as "racist".  Be careful with your labels though because if intellectual people like myself start being labeled as "racist", the negative connotations of the word start to lose their meaning.  I'm friends with many visible minorities.  In fact, as of this writing I am in the company of three of my Lebanese friends all of whom I will be spending the balance of the day with.

I've said some unpopular things and some have gone over-the-top, but generally I do cite research studies to go along with these unpopular opinions.  For example, I can provide a scientific reference which confirms the brain size differences between Asians and whites.  It would make little difference because people would still say it is racist.

But you are purposely exploiting the situation with your knowledge that most people are not smart enough to actually read what I say and would rather follow the consensus.  That is actually the same sneaky approach leaders throughout history have used to manipulate the masses.  Yes, I admit that I have been over-the-top at times.  Generally I am very reasonable unless attacked (which is most of the time on here, lol).

PS. You cited Vince Goodrum as being a 'successful' guy. Please state your definition of success.

Vince Goodrum. 

Circular, I know, but he is comfortable and doing well for himself.  He is an interesting personality on the boards.

[candidizzle]

Rational thought and the theory of maximization of utility. Not religious dogma

okay

i disgaree soemwhat with wha your saying because of its implications for the government to be able to put its hands in certain areas where i dont think they should interfere...not in a republic at least...

and i was only playing devils advocate

[The Master]

okay

i disgaree soemwhat with wha your saying because of its implications for the government to be able to put its hands in certain areas where i dont think they should interfere...not in a republic at least...

and i was only playing devils advocate

Debussey has grown up in a secular society that places no real value on religion in general, thus, Debussey can't stand religious thought in politics. Irrational horseshit that leads to superstition and stupidity.

 

[candidizzle]

candidizzle grew up going to catecism every week but candidizzle thinks that being religious is moronic and being spiritual is sign of true intelligence

i try to be spiritual

but like i say im retarded

 

[The Master]

candidizzle grew up going to catecism every week but candidizzle thinks that being religious is moronic and being spiritual is sign of true intelligence

i try to be spiritual

but like i say im retarded

 

Being spiritual = good stuff, brings an extra dimension to life.

Believing in some irrational stupid religious dogma, ESPECIALLY if you believe it word for word while trying to enforce it on others through politics and shit, then kill yourself.
Make no mistake, Debussey respects religious people that keeps their stuff to themselves while giving their kids the free choice of NOT being religious. But going beyond that = fuck themselves.

Religion in its contemporary form will be gone in 200 - 300 years in the developed world nevertheless

[candidizzle]

Being spiritual = good stuff, brings an extra dimension to life.

Believing in some irrational stupid religious dogma, ESPECIALLY if you believe it word for word while trying to enforce it on others through politics and shit, then kill yourself.
Make no mistake, Debussey respects religious people that keeps their stuff to themselves while giving their kids the free choice of NOT being religious. But going beyond that = fuck themselves.

Religion in its contemporary form will be gone in 200 - 300 years in the developed world nevertheless

the way things are going... the human population in its contemporary form will be gone in 200-300 years ...LOL

[The Master]

the way things are going... the human population in its contemporary form will be gone in 200-300 years ...LOL

In 100 years: genetic engineering will be common. Newborns will have super - talents. Nanotech and shit might be used to "upgrade" humans further.

The human of today will not exist in 300 years, that = for sure. Hopefully, some kind of enhanched human will kick ass in teh future.

Praise Transhumanism. It =coming.

All this will happen if humans = not wiped off this planet by "teh technological singularity" (heey Ray Kurzweil), some astroid or disease wipes us off this planet, or some other things.