Author Topic: Natural vs drugged? a NON issue .  (Read 949 times)

Howard

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15401
Natural vs drugged? a NON issue .
« on: May 22, 2008, 03:41:16 PM »
Here is my basic idea:
Since the biggest shows in bodybuilding, have NO drug testing, why even bother trying to speculate about who is/was really natural?In fact, who uses what drug or even synthol, is a moot point.
Unless the IFBB decides to do actual, legit and complete drug testing, it is a NON issue.
Why? The physiques are judged as the appear on the stage and how they got that way is not tested for and no subtances are banned, etc.
I know I have beaten this drug issue to death, but I think it is time to let it RIP.
Your thoughts?
Howard

BlueDevil

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1117
Re: Natural vs drugged? a NON issue .
« Reply #1 on: May 22, 2008, 03:43:02 PM »

i think you need to get laid  :D

Howard

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15401
Re: Natural vs drugged? a NON issue .
« Reply #2 on: May 22, 2008, 03:45:48 PM »
i think you need to get laid  :D
Hmmm, are you asking?Interested in middle aged chunky bodybuilders are we?

MAXX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17460
  • MAGA
Re: Natural vs drugged? a NON issue .
« Reply #3 on: May 22, 2008, 03:50:28 PM »
If the IFBB starts drug testing they will also lose most bb fans.

And the bb'ers in IFBB would just swich to another organisation w/o drug testing.

Seems like what gh15 says is true sadly: bodybuilding = steroids/hormones

Howard

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15401
Re: Natural vs drugged? a NON issue .
« Reply #4 on: May 22, 2008, 03:53:41 PM »
If the IFBB starts drug testing they will also lose most bb fans.

And the bb'ers in IFBB would just swich to another organisation w/o drug testing.

Seems like what gh15 says is true sadly: bodybuilding = steroids/hormones
Exactly, GH15 and I may disagree about the absolute need for drugs to devlop a decent physique, but you need drugged bodies to get the extreme levels we see in the modern pro.
It is what it is, and to me I no longer care...

Moosejay

  • Guest
Re: Natural vs drugged? a NON issue .
« Reply #5 on: May 22, 2008, 03:55:21 PM »
Here is my basic idea:
Since the biggest shows in bodybuilding, have NO drug testing, why even bother trying to speculate about who is/was really natural?In fact, who uses what drug or even synthol, is a moot point.
Unless the IFBB decides to do actual, legit and complete drug testing, it is a NON issue.
Why? The physiques are judged as the appear on the stage and how they got that way is not tested for and no subtances are banned, etc.
I know I have beaten this drug issue to death, but I think it is time to let it RIP.
Your thoughts?
Howard

with drug use:

"He who screams loudest is guilty..."

Same category as:

"Methinks the man/lady doth protest too much..."

BlueDevil

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1117
Re: Natural vs drugged? a NON issue .
« Reply #6 on: May 22, 2008, 03:57:31 PM »
Hmmm, are you asking?Interested in middle aged chunky bodybuilders are we?

says the guy who's  transgender doctor was on pcp and forgot to use the scaple, but my boobs look ok,right..  :D

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19674
Re: Natural vs drugged? a NON issue .
« Reply #7 on: May 22, 2008, 04:16:52 PM »
Hmmm, are you asking?Interested in middle aged chunky bodybuilders are we?

Yep!  :P