Author Topic: Senate deals defeat to Bush on Iraq war spending  (Read 715 times)

Benny B

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 12407
  • Ron = 'Princess L' & many other gimmicks - FACT!
Senate deals defeat to Bush on Iraq war spending
« on: May 22, 2008, 10:55:54 PM »
Senate deals defeat to Bush on Iraq war spending
By ANDREW TAYLOR, Associated Press Writer
Thu May 22, 10:30 PM ET
 

In a stunning vote that illustrated President Bush's diminished standing, the Senate on Thursday ignored his veto threat and added tens of billions of dollars for veterans and the unemployed to his Iraq war spending bill.

A majority of Republicans broke ranks with Bush on a veto-proof 75-22 vote while adding more than $10 billion for various other domestic programs, including heating subsidies for the poor, wildfire fighting, road and bridge repair, and health research.

Democrats crowed about their victory. But the developments meant more confusion about when the must-pass measure might actually become law and what the final version will contain.

Senators voted 70-26 to approve $165 billion to fulfill Bush's request for military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan into next spring, when Bush's successor will set war policy. Overall, the measure contains $212 billion over the coming two years — $28 billion more than the administration sought — plus about $50 billion more through 2017 for veterans' education benefits.

Bush has promised to veto the Iraq spending if it exceeds his request. He has enough GOP support in the House to sustain a veto.

But the spectacle of 25 Senate Republicans abandoning the White House and voting to extend jobless benefits by 13 weeks and boost the GI Bill to provide veterans enough money to pay for a four-year education at a public institution made it plain that Bush's influence is waning.

"He has no political capital left," said Sen. Robert Bennett, R-Utah.


"What influence?" said a triumphant Sen. Harry Reid of Nevada, the Democratic majority leader. Reid had been skeptical of adding dozens of items favored by the free-spending Appropriations Committee to Bush's war request.

But the committee's plan contained so many smaller items favored by senators in both parties — including money for Gulf Coast hurricane recovery, NASA, and additional food and drug safety inspectors — that even GOP conservatives such as Sens. Larry Craig and Mike Crapo of Idaho rebuffed the White House. The duo were strong supporters of $400 million to subsidize schools in rural counties hit hard by declines in timber revenues.

The bill also contained $490 million for grants to local police departments, $451 million to repair roads damaged by natural disasters, $200 million for the space shuttle program, and $400 million for National Institutes of Health research projects.

The Senate action sent the bill back to the House, which last week endorsed the help for veterans and the unemployed, but kept its version clean of most other domestic programs. The House also included a one-half of a percentage point income tax surcharge on wealthier people to pay for the expanded GI bill.

The House also failed to approve the war money in a vote last week. Republicans unhappy with the Democrats' add-ons joined with anti-war lawmakers to defeat it.

Because of the differences between the two versions, it will take weeks to pass a final compromise, which Bush is expected to veto, and then send him one he can sign.

Time is slipping, though Defense Secretary Robert Gates testified Wednesday that the Pentagon can scrape by until late July by shifting funds from other accounts to finance operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

First, however, lawmakers left Washington for a weeklong Memorial Day recess.

A popular plan in both the House and Senate bills would block new Bush administration rules that would cut spending on Medicaid health care for the poor and disabled by $13 billion over the next five years. Governors in both parties pressed for the relief.

The White House had braced for defeat even as Democrats initially expressed skepticism they would prevail. Yet the magnitude of the defeat was startling.

"Our troops deserve better than having essential war time resources held hostage to billions in unrelated spending," White House spokesman Tony Fratto said. "Congress should pass a clean war funding bill when they return from Memorial Day recess."

Still, it seems clear that Bush will have to accept some Democratic additions.

"When it comes to Iraq, it appears that money is no object for President Bush," said the chairman of the Appropriations Committee, Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va. "Yet when it comes to important priorities here at home, he turns into Ebeneezer Scrooge."

Domestic programs included $8.2 billion for Hurricane Katrina and other natural disasters, with $5.8 billion for levees around New Orleans and $348 million for restoration of Mississippi coastal islands.
!

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Senate deals defeat to Bush on Iraq war spending
« Reply #1 on: May 23, 2008, 04:11:06 AM »
This is when repub incumbents in Congress - who all saw their repub counterparts lose their seats in 2006 - work very hard, and very vocally, to break with Bush on the war before Nov elections.

This may be their only opportunity to do it, and get coverage locally before the national election takes over and they're tied to bush for elections.

We're facing seriously tough economic times here.  And Bush wants to send billions more to a country who refuses to spend their own $30-40 billion surplus on reconstruction.

drkaje

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18188
  • Quiet, Err. I'm transmitting rage.
Re: Senate deals defeat to Bush on Iraq war spending
« Reply #2 on: May 23, 2008, 04:55:12 AM »
I'd be more impressed if they had prevented him from attacking in the first place.

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: Senate deals defeat to Bush on Iraq war spending
« Reply #3 on: May 23, 2008, 04:19:03 PM »
What do the poor and roads have to do with war funding...Bush wanted a clean bill.  Half the damm bills before Congress are filled with bullshit that has nothing to do with the bill at large.
L

Bindare_Dundat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12227
  • KILL CENTRAL BANKS, BUY BITCOIN.
Re: Senate deals defeat to Bush on Iraq war spending
« Reply #4 on: May 23, 2008, 05:11:30 PM »
The markets are really doing well right now, I think we can afford to spend anywhere we can find a place to spend.

War-Horse

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6490
Re: Senate deals defeat to Bush on Iraq war spending
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2008, 07:51:36 PM »
What do the poor and roads have to do with war funding...Bush wanted a clean bill.  Half the damm bills before Congress are filled with bullshit that has nothing to do with the bill at large.


Sadly to get Dictator bushs attention they have to attach it to something of interest to him.  Otherwise he'll continue to fuck you in the ass and tell you to smile.

War-Horse

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6490
Re: Senate deals defeat to Bush on Iraq war spending
« Reply #6 on: May 23, 2008, 07:52:29 PM »
TRUE....


Quote
"When it comes to Iraq, it appears that money is no object for President Bush," said the chairman of the Appropriations Committee, Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va. "Yet when it comes to important priorities here at home, he turns into Ebeneezer Scrooge."