ATTACKS ATTACKS ATTACKS.
Not one piece of evidence or data at all. Not one scientific study. Link me to ONE post of yours where you even cited ONE study. Not one reference from a credible source. Nothing but attacks.
I give you my burden of proof and make it all too simple to fulfill and you can't even do that. If I'm telling you that I will shut up if you give me proof wouldn't that be some motivation to actually do so?
But you can't, you won't. You know you have nothing that I can't easily dismantle with evidence so you attack me to get brownie points with the collective or morons on this site - a collective that everyone in the industry thinks is a joke I might add. You can't debate on my terms (those being the NORMAL terms of an intellectual debate), so you don't. You just come back with attacks because you have nothing else. Nothing for me to address except attacks.
lol.
Exactly!
People claims to have "debunked" your scientific references that forms the core of your opinion: Different races differs in intelligence, yet all they have done is to try to put the research into question using their own reasoning. But N O B O D Y has posted real scientific studies and REAL scientists REALLY debunking the research you have posted, point by point.
Claiming "Iq tests are not culture fair" does not debunk the science, mainly because the research has been controlled for "cultural differences", but no poster would know that because they have no real insight to the studies, thus, they have no basis to refute it.
Until somebody posts R E A L studies and REAL statements from CREDIBLE researchers that argues the different points in the research MattCock has posted, nobody has debated anything, and MattCocks argument about races and intelligence holds. (and no, making personal claims and interpretations is not good enough. Answer by real research) And of course, claiming that a lot of science shows difference in intelligence between races, andthat this can be claimed with a certain amount of probability is not racism, its merely an objective observation. Thus, MattCock is not a RACIST for claiming differences in intelligence between races that most likely has a partial genetic origin, claiming that is just an observation.
But of course, all the attacks on MattCocks "weird" character traits = teh owning.