It appears that Luke can't quite find his way here. So, I'll have to do his work for him.
Your claims that Jesus condoned:
- Genital mutilation (circumcision). Ummmm......that was part of the covenant with Abraham, done ONLY to males, when they were eight days old (hardly the tortorous process you're pitifully making it to be).
- Arrange marriages: What's so "evil" about that? The parents set up the logistics, you know, silly little things like FOOD, SHELTER, ENSURING GAINFUL EMPLOYMENT. And, it appears you're assuming that there was no love involved between the parties. The concept of two youngsters in love, urging their parents to make the deal, is hardly an inconceivable one.
- Child molestation: where does this happen, again? Maybe someone should inform you that in the state of Massachusetts, females can marry as young as 12 (with parental permission). Is that molestation?
- Child sacrifice: Ummm....Child sacrifice had been outlawed since the days of Moses. Israel, unfortunately, did participate in it, as it's documented that Israel became more evil than its neighbors.
You referred to Jesus as a "freeloader". Last time I checked, he worked as a carpenter. In other words, he had a....JOB (see Mark 6).
Your spiel about widows is off the mark as well. The Pharisees were asking him a loaded question about a woman's husbands, dying one after the other (Matt. 22), in order to trip him up. They asked, whose wife would this hypothetical woman be "in the resurrection". This has ANYTHING but Jesus saying that widows should not be married.
Quite the opposite! When Peter carried on Jesus' ministry, he instructed Christians to dedicate their resources to widows with small children (see 1 Tim. 5)
Other widows had care systems in place, according to law. Women with grown offspring could be cared for by those offspring; and childless widows could be redeemed by their dead husband's male in-laws (see the book of Ruth).
I don't need to misquote you. You've tried to make the claim that Jesus was evil, because he allegedly didn't address these items (some of which aren't even offenses or "evils"). And, as such, you've tried tying Jesus' so-called moral failing into an argument, condoning same-sex "marriage".
But, given that your facts are anything but (in this instance), your case crumbles.
