Author Topic: Is Ronnie Coleman over the hill ? (Read 7141 times)

pumpster · « **Reply #25 on:** June 02, 2008, 11:23:10 PM »

Quote from: SAMSON123 on June 02, 2008, 08:13:24 PM

GEE.. lemme see...lets take a photo of a person with a high powered flash and make them squint and then say ...HEY YOU LOOK OLDER...

RONNIE STILL LOOKS BETTER THAN 100 PERCENT OF EVERYONE ON THIS BOARD...

Funny that this reality didn't occur to most. Exactly what is a guy in his mid-40s supposed to look like who's on far less if any hormones now and not seriously competing duh.

Yup, still looks better than anyone here including the clueless author of this thread lol he was over the hill in BB terms 2 years ago, hello?

pumpster · « **Reply #26 on:** June 02, 2008, 11:27:32 PM »

Quote from: Groink on June 02, 2008, 11:00:50 PM

If something happened to me and one of my arms shriveled up....that would fuck me up.

Don't worry, you'll never get to the kind of weights that caused those injuries and atrophy lol

England_1 · « **Reply #27 on:** June 02, 2008, 11:27:37 PM »

Ronnie's head completely changed shape since 1998

England_1 · « **Reply #28 on:** June 02, 2008, 11:28:36 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on June 02, 2008, 11:27:32 PM

Don't worry, you'll never get to the kind of weights that caused those injuries and atrophy lol

But you will on your bowflex LMFAO

How come you didn't reply to the owning you took in the Dillet thread? LOL.

pumpster · « **Reply #29 on:** June 02, 2008, 11:30:13 PM »

Quote from: England_1 on June 02, 2008, 11:28:36 PM

But you will on your bowflex LMFAO

How come you didn't reply to the owning you took in the Dillet thread? LOL.

epic pumpster obsession lol

RZA · « **Reply #30 on:** June 03, 2008, 02:16:47 AM »

The guy has had a surprisingly long career, with a long run at the top. His body resisted the continuous "drugs/over-eating/hard training" regime better than most. Its only logical that at one point it would give up in some way or another.

pumpster · « **Reply #31 on:** June 03, 2008, 02:37:55 AM »

Quote from: RZA on June 03, 2008, 02:16:47 AM

Its only logical that at one point it would give up in some way or another.

Logical of course to those who lift, have been at it a long while and exercise common sense.

England_1 · « **Reply #32 on:** June 03, 2008, 03:12:25 AM »

Quote from: pumpster on June 02, 2008, 11:30:13 PM

epic pumpster obsession lol

you = epic retard

spinnis · « **Reply #33 on:** June 03, 2008, 03:19:39 AM »

He still looks great.

spinnis · « **Reply #34 on:** June 03, 2008, 03:30:07 AM »

m8 · « **Reply #35 on:** June 03, 2008, 03:52:51 AM »

Why is he still on steroids? Isn't he supposed to be "retired" ?

Meso_z · « **Reply #36 on:** June 03, 2008, 05:04:59 AM »

Quote from: m8 on June 03, 2008, 03:52:51 AM

Why is he still on steroids? Isn't he supposed to be "retired" ?

MONSTER_TRICEPS · « **Reply #37 on:** June 03, 2008, 05:05:58 AM »

Quote from: Swede! on June 03, 2008, 03:30:07 AM

Huge as fuck.

pumpster · « **Reply #38 on:** June 03, 2008, 05:10:51 AM »

Quote from: MONSTER_TRICEPS on June 03, 2008, 05:05:58 AM

Huge as fuck.

lol even now the arms are so much bigger than those of the dweebs criticizing them. They don't get just how big he still is and are easily mislead by a few pics at different angles.

The weight gain was to be expected, he always did that. He has a lot farther to go before getting back to anything resembling smaller dimensions.

Trev · « **Reply #39 on:** June 03, 2008, 05:37:39 AM »

Ronnie looks great for a 43 year old ex pro. Left arm is still 19/20" easy. He should enjoy his retirement but is still top 10 Olympia material IF he wanted to be.

shootfighter1 · « **Reply #40 on:** June 03, 2008, 07:04:01 AM »

He just turned 44 last month. I think Ronnie looks very good....and would look great without the injuries and enlarged midsection. Prior to 1996, his midsection was tapered.