Uh Hedge...I'd invite u to revisit the 90's. Clinton was a shill for the UN. Sending Condi doesn't mean sending in troops. We're bringing AFRICOM on board and will be running by the time a new President gets in. Barry will want to use his new to toy to spread love and cheer across the globe, no better place then the money pit that is Africa. And before I get some cut and paste article about are involvement in Africa, yes we have tons of SOF doing their thing. Thats alot different then having an Armored Div tearing across the plains..wasting more money in another series of shithole countries.
Look, I think it's great if not everyone buys into the Barack Obama hype.
But instead of making claims of what you thinks he wants to do, some kind of "secret agenda", why not attack his policies, the ones that he is trying to sell?
My point is, I've seen you claim Barack Obama is naive, that he's untrustworthy because of some kind of "Muslim" connection, that he's a rookie, that he should be in Iraq, that he will pour money into Africa...
But I've yet to see you attack the policies of Barack Obama. The man may actually become the next president. Lets consider that for a moment.
The only one who benefits from the personal attacks on Barack Obama... is Barack Obama.
Because that allows him to work his image of being some kind of change and beacon of hope even further.
One question:
The military contractors are for the first time in 14 years investing more in the Democratic Party than they do in the Republican Party.
What does that say about US presence in Iraq with Barack Obama as president?
Shit like that needs to be asked IMO.
Is Barack Obama serious about leaving Iraq?
Does he have the political balls to clean up the national debt, which will take serious slashing of the military fundings?
How can he promise tax cuts?
Nobody seems to ask these questions.
