aethetics, in general, is everything. aesthetics takes into account shape symetry size definiton conditioning muscle maturity...aesthetics is the overall look of the body...
dorian had mass and he had grainyness... other than that he had nothing
his body was ugly, plain nd simple. mr olympia should not have an ugly physqiue.
ronnie coleman was VERY aesthetic when hitting the poses ever year except 2004, 2006, and 2007... every other year when he hit the poses he had the big x frame and all the right curves cuts had the the look... gut distension does not = poor aesthetics...sorry..
aesthetics in general is NOT everything and stop typing the same shit like its different criteria definition is conditioning and aesthetics has nothing to do with size one can be aesthetic and small and aesthetic and massive , symmetry is part of aesthetics and you need to have great muscle balance & proportion which Ronnie doesn't , the hallmarks of an aesthetic physique is delts , calves and abdominals Ronnie is missing two of these now he does have better ' shape ' than Dorian however that has nothing to do it because almost everyone had better ' shape ' than Dorian
your comment that Dorian had mass and graininess and thats all is again ignorant , he had great size great balance & proportion coupled with great density & dryness he didn't need an aesthetic physique to beat everyone who did
now your opinion now Mr Olympia should have an ' ugly ' physique lol look no further than Coleman 98 with bitch tits and looking pregnant this is aesthetic? I know you don't think a gut makes a less than aesthetic physique but the IFBB does hence they made a rule for it I think because of Ronnie
again you don't know much about competitive bodybuilding you sure don't know anything of you think Ronnie was aesthetic lol what numbers was he on Flex's list again of the top 20 most aesthetic physiques? lol