Author Topic: The most complete back of all time...  (Read 36508 times)

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: The most complete back of all time...
« Reply #50 on: July 05, 2008, 12:14:49 PM »
Best backs:

1)Yates
2)Coleman
3)Haney
4)Bannout

Earl1972

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22152
  • #EarlToo
Re: The most complete back of all time...
« Reply #51 on: July 05, 2008, 01:19:39 PM »
too bad dorian looks like shit from the front

E
E

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83280
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: The most complete back of all time...
« Reply #52 on: July 05, 2008, 01:27:01 PM »
sorry kiddo, but my quotes trump yours. There's a reason the guys I posted get paid to write articles for the largest bodybuilding magazine in the world. As for the Team Flex poll in 99, that's obsolete now that they came out with a newer poll. ;)

Ronnie's back has the same width, thickness, and detail minus the ugly bacne and skin folds.



No they don't trump anything thats your belief and nothing more just like you believe 2003 was Ronnie's best again it shows you don't know much and you've yet to explain WHY the newer poll is right and the other is wrong ! and lastly Ronnie once again concedes to Dorian's superiority

Neo = stuck on stupid

you're fucking high if you think Ronnie's back is just as wide at 244 pounds compared to Yates at 268 pounds , thickness LMMFAO get the fuck out of here lol again more monumentally stupid assessments from GetBig's moron brigade and detail NO again flat out wrong period end of sentence another dumb assessment Dorian's back crushes Ronnie in all of the above

lol I'm still laughing at Ronnie having a thicker , wider back at 244 pounds compared to Dorian at 269 pounds lol oh boy I can always count on you for a good laugh .  ;)

Camel Jockey

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16711
  • Mel Gibson and Bob Sly World Domination
Re: The most complete back of all time...
« Reply #53 on: July 05, 2008, 01:28:35 PM »
I am kinda more partial towards Yates's back. I'd say Ronnie = the biggest back ever, but not the best. Dorian's back was a combo of thickness, detail and size.

And I'm not even a Yates fan, so..

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: The most complete back of all time...
« Reply #54 on: July 05, 2008, 04:05:34 PM »
No they don't trump anything thats your belief and nothing more just like you believe 2003 was Ronnie's best again it shows you don't know much and you've yet to explain WHY the newer poll is right and the other is wrong ! and lastly Ronnie once again concedes to Dorian's superiority

yes they do, and you stating the opposite of me doesn't make your comment true. Ronnie Coleman, Samir Bannout, and Markus Ruhl are just bodybuilders. They guys I quoted are bodybuilding are journalists whose job is to know the judging criteria and write reviews for the largest bodybuilding magazine in the world. How you arrived at the conclusion that your guys are just as credible as mine is beyond me.

Quote
Neo = stuck on stupid

NarcissiticSissy = internet nobody who thinks he knows what he's talking about

Quote
you're fucking high if you think Ronnie's back is just as wide at 244 pounds compared to Yates at 268 pounds , thickness LMMFAO get the fuck out of here lol again more monumentally stupid assessments from GetBig's moron brigade and detail NO again flat out wrong period end of sentence another dumb assessment Dorian's back crushes Ronnie in all of the above

Ronnie at 247 lbs is not the same as Dorian at 247 lbs. Also, who's to say that all the extra weight was in Dorian's back? So you cannot use the numbers argument and claim that Dorian was wider b/c he weighed 20 lbs more.

Peter McGough – Flex Magazine, August 2005

"Personally, the best physique I ever saw onstage was Ronnie's at the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic. He was cut, full, trim in the waist and a monster (proving that when you're supersharp, you look superbig) at 247 pounds. Ronnie sporting that look would, in my opinion, be unbeatable."

John Hansen, 2x Mr. Natural Universe and Mr. Natural Olympia

"With his incredible thickness and muscle shape, Coleman doesn't need to weigh over 260 pounds on stage to look big. When he won the Arnold Classic last year, Ronnie only weighed 247 pounds but he looked like he weighed 20 pounds heavier."

Dexter Jackson – Getbig Interview 2004

“I am not the gossip type. I let them do all the talking, and I let my physique back my talking up. I know Craig Titus was saying something like he knows that Lee Priest is 200 pounds, I’m 220 pounds, and he is 250 pounds, and all this shit, but what Craig does not realize is that his 250 pounds is not like Ronnie Coleman’s 250 pounds. See what I am saying? I think I have proven to everyone that size doesn't matter. You don't look at Craig and say 'whoa, that’s a big dude’. You might say that about Ronnie or Jay at 250, but not Craig.”

Quote
lol I'm still laughing at Ronnie having a thicker , wider back at 244 pounds compared to Dorian at 269 pounds lol oh boy I can always count on you for a good laugh.

way to support your argument by using pics. ::)




JohnnyVegas

  • Guest
Re: The most complete back of all time...
« Reply #55 on: July 05, 2008, 04:12:59 PM »

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: The most complete back of all time...
« Reply #56 on: July 05, 2008, 04:16:19 PM »
Dorian wins this one.......

cool. Asymmetrical traps, bacne, a poorly defined Christmas tree, and skin folds. Awesome!

JohnnyVegas

  • Guest
Re: The most complete back of all time...
« Reply #57 on: July 05, 2008, 04:19:40 PM »
cool. Asymmetrical traps, bacne, a poorly defined Christmas tree, and skin folds. Awesome!

Not D's best condition that's for sure....

ToxicAvenger

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26516
  • I thawt I taw a twat!
Re: The most complete back of all time...
« Reply #58 on: July 05, 2008, 04:33:38 PM »
carpe` vaginum!

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83280
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: The most complete back of all time...
« Reply #59 on: July 05, 2008, 04:46:47 PM »
yes they do, and you stating the opposite of me doesn't make your comment true. Ronnie Coleman, Samir Bannout, and Markus Ruhl are just bodybuilders. They guys I quoted are bodybuilding are journalists whose job is to know the judging criteria and write reviews for the largest bodybuilding magazine in the world. How you arrived at the conclusion that your guys are just as credible as mine is beyond me.

NarcissiticSissy = internet nobody who thinks he knows what he's talking about

Ronnie at 247 lbs is not the same as Dorian at 247 lbs. Also, who's to say that all the extra weight was in Dorian's back? So you cannot use the numbers argument and claim that Dorian was wider b/c he weighed 20 lbs more.

Peter McGough – Flex Magazine, August 2005

"Personally, the best physique I ever saw onstage was Ronnie's at the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic. He was cut, full, trim in the waist and a monster (proving that when you're supersharp, you look superbig) at 247 pounds. Ronnie sporting that look would, in my opinion, be unbeatable."

John Hansen, 2x Mr. Natural Universe and Mr. Natural Olympia

"With his incredible thickness and muscle shape, Coleman doesn't need to weigh over 260 pounds on stage to look big. When he won the Arnold Classic last year, Ronnie only weighed 247 pounds but he looked like he weighed 20 pounds heavier."

Dexter Jackson – Getbig Interview 2004

“I am not the gossip type. I let them do all the talking, and I let my physique back my talking up. I know Craig Titus was saying something like he knows that Lee Priest is 200 pounds, I’m 220 pounds, and he is 250 pounds, and all this shit, but what Craig does not realize is that his 250 pounds is not like Ronnie Coleman’s 250 pounds. See what I am saying? I think I have proven to everyone that size doesn't matter. You don't look at Craig and say 'whoa, that’s a big dude’. You might say that about Ronnie or Jay at 250, but not Craig.”

way to support your argument by using pics. ::)



Quote
yes they do, and you stating the opposite of me doesn't make your comment true. Ronnie Coleman, Samir Bannout, and Markus Ruhl are just bodybuilders. They guys I quoted are bodybuilding are journalists whose job is to know the judging criteria and write reviews for the largest bodybuilding magazine in the world. How you arrived at the conclusion that your guys are just as credible as mine is beyond me.

No they don't and the irony of you now clinging to the writers YOU dismissed now you're forced to kiss their asses because some agree with you LOL this is great to see you back tracking you're the idiot who dismissed Peter McGough's opinion and asked " What was his major in college English lit " lol my how the tables have turned

And two Mr Olympias with great backs midn you have said the same and again Dorian had the best back ever according to the writers you're now forced to agree with but this doesn't matter either some how lol because we all know Ronnie's back got better in post 99  ::) his back got wider and consistently softer with increased size , Dorian on the other hand maintained the hardness in his back at much higher bodyweights

Quote
NarcissiticSissy = internet nobody who thinks he knows what he's talking about

Ronnie at 247 lbs is not the same as Dorian at 247 lbs. Also, who's to say that all the extra weight was in Dorian's back? So you cannot use the numbers argument and claim that Dorian was wider b/c he weighed 20 lbs more.

I always knew you were prone to pathetic arguments and faulty logic and now we've added petty name calling? your frustration level is showing again  ;) anyway I may not know it all , I may not know more than most however on the topic of competitive bodybuilding is concerned I have constantly proven I know a FUCK of a lot more than you thats a fact !! remember I thought you that balance & proportion were two separate entities , I thought you how competitive bodybuilding was judged , I proved to you Yates had better density & dryness than Ronnie , oppppppsssss I forgot you dismissed Peter McGough's statement on that but now need it for others , who once said " if you agree with one quote you have to agree with all of them ' ? LMFAO you're so simple kid

First of all Ronnie was 244 pounds in 2001 and Dorian was 269 pounds and I posted a side-by-side comparison of Dorian at 257 pounds compared to Ronnie at 250 pounds and his back was noticeably wider with just 7 pounds now imagine another 25 pounds compared to Ronnie's 244 ! Ronnie's small waist & hips help with the illusion of great width but Dorian doesn't need an illusion his back is wide as fuck even with a wider waist & hips and again I laugh at you thinking Ronnie had a wider back at 244 pounds than Dorian at 269 pounds you're a complete moron for trying that one

again those quote mean dick and why? if a 318 pound Ferrigno couldn't dwarf a 257 pound Dorian NO WAY IN HELL a 244 pound Ronnie make a 269 pound Dorian look small ! that only happens in your imaginary picture comparisons lol

I.F.B.B. judge Roger Schwab

Man-mountain Dorian Yates was certainly the top gun in the 1993 Mr Olympia shootout. He was much bigger , better and harder than ever , and while his is never the prettiest physique on stage , he's assuredly the most God-awful muscular superman this sport has yet seen. Though Yates was lighter than Lou Ferrigno or Paul Dillett , he appeared to be the biggest man on stage-by far- and the hardest , dominating from beginning to end and every step in between.


Thats from an IFBB judge but I'm sure you know more than him lol sucker  ;)

From where I sat, in certain poses you would never know Dexter was giving up 70lbs to Ronnie?

Shawn commenting on how a 296 pound Ronnie in some poses couldn't dwarf a 225 pound Dexter lol and he's supposed to dwarf a 269 pound Dorian LMMFAO sure you're right , again only in your comparisons kid





Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: The most complete back of all time...
« Reply #60 on: July 05, 2008, 04:51:45 PM »
Nice try NONE of those quotes invalidate the one from Ronnie himself or , Samir Bannout or , Rhul or Team Flex in 1999 NONE of them Dorian had the best back in 1992 and it still hasn't been matched

Dorian at his best vs the pics you just posted give me a fucking break Yates at 269 crushes Ronnie in thickness , width and detail his lats insert lower and he has striated traps



LOL, even with yates best picture of his back, he is still:

"Ranked as having the SECOND-BEST BACK in bodybuilding history........."

Now I'll wait for your worthless comeback with excuse after excuse. Do you honestly think you know more than the people that made the ranks and the 40+ people that I have quoted? Seriously, answer this question that you have been running away from the past 2 years, LOL.

Don't even try to add in your pathetic "ad populum" argument because that excuse has been demolished over and over. Bodybuilding comes down to Opinions (Eye witnesses/quotes) & Numbers (judging/rounds/points)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83280
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: The most complete back of all time...
« Reply #61 on: July 05, 2008, 04:52:10 PM »
cool. Asymmetrical traps, bacne, a poorly defined Christmas tree, and skin folds. Awesome!

lmfao we don't let fan-boys pick the photos for a reason , Dorian's back is wider , thicker , his lats are lower , and his density is unmatched . Dorian's x-mass tree doesn't need to be seen in the rear latspread because its clearly visible right before he does it  ;)

Dorian has a better back because he has lower , thicker and wider lats especially compared to a 244 pound Ronnie , he has better traps they're bigger and thicker and show much better detail , Dorian has better spinal erectors and lower lat striations , his back is more complete and lacks zero


NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83280
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: The most complete back of all time...
« Reply #62 on: July 05, 2008, 04:57:55 PM »
LOL, even with yates best picture of his back, he is still:

"Ranked as having the SECOND-BEST BACK in bodybuilding history........."

Now I'll wait for your worthless comeback with excuse after excuse. Do you honestly think you know more than the people that made the ranks and the 40+ people that I have quoted? Seriously, answer this question that you have been running away from the past 2 years, LOL.

Don't even try to add in your pathetic "ad populum" argument because that excuse has been demolished over and over. Bodybuilding comes down to Opinions (Eye witnesses/quotes) & Numbers (judging/rounds/points)

One I never ran from anything you typed thats another one of your lies  ;) two Dorian was ranked has having the best back by Team Flex in 1999 after his retirement , because some new writers judged and they picked Ronnie it means that list is void? lol more great logic !

Ronnie himself said Dorian had the best back do you think your opinion trumps his? or Samir Bannouts? two Mr Olympias own you , I own you  ;)

and again idiot you cling onto for dear life to appeals to numbers you need to I don't , bodybuilding contests FYI are not judged by the popular opinion they're judged by 13 people not the 8000 in attendance  ;)

iceman = owned


Ronnie Coleman : DESCRIBE DORIAN YATES: A close friend. Dorian is very intelligent, a great Mr. Olympia. He had the best side-chest pose and the thickest freakiest back I have ever seen. oh snap this was 2003 too !!  ;)





NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83280
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: The most complete back of all time...
« Reply #63 on: July 05, 2008, 04:58:44 PM »
lotsa volume...no density



exactly like Ronnie 2003 someone who gets it.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83280
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: The most complete back of all time...
« Reply #64 on: July 05, 2008, 05:01:26 PM »
Dorian's lats insert near his waist , they're wider , his traps are bigger & thicker , his detail is better as well as his density & dryness and this is just a 7 pound advantage seeing Yates was 257 pounds & Ronnie 250

Dorian would crush Ronnie at 244 pounds at 269 pounds

IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: The most complete back of all time...
« Reply #65 on: July 05, 2008, 05:30:31 PM »
whats really funny is that in the 'before and after' shots of Ronnie 99 that ND keeps posting, Ronnie has a better back than dorian ever did in both of them!

shopped or unshopped!

hahahahaha


every time you've been proven wrong and busted about the fake pics, you totally ignore it and then spout of again how much better ronnie is than dorian.

utterly pathetic.
R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)

marcus

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3021
Re: The most complete back of all time...
« Reply #66 on: July 05, 2008, 05:35:31 PM »
Stubbs looks pretty good.

dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
Re: The most complete back of all time...
« Reply #67 on: July 05, 2008, 05:36:37 PM »
Why can't you guys be like the Reeses' Peanut Butter Cup guys and agree to have Ronnie's size and Dorian's dryness?  ::)     :D

candidizzle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9046
  • Trueprotein.com 5% discount code= TRB953
Re: The most complete back of all time...
« Reply #68 on: July 05, 2008, 05:39:18 PM »
 :D

candidizzle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9046
  • Trueprotein.com 5% discount code= TRB953
Re: The most complete back of all time...
« Reply #69 on: July 05, 2008, 05:40:35 PM »
 ;D

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83280
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: The most complete back of all time...
« Reply #70 on: July 05, 2008, 05:41:48 PM »

every time you've been proven wrong and busted about the fake pics, you totally ignore it and then spout of again how much better ronnie is than dorian.

utterly pathetic.

Great post ! lol he's lied and made up quotes he was exposed for this , he knowingly used photoshopped pics exposed again , his cronies made some of the most God-awful ' comparisons ' ever where Dorian has a smaller waist & hips than Ronnie , and Ronnie has the same size calves lol

These guys were finished a long time ago they're still looking to get even !

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83280
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: The most complete back of all time...
« Reply #71 on: July 05, 2008, 05:42:26 PM »
;D

LMFAO Soft as the day is long especially compared to 2001

candidizzle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9046
  • Trueprotein.com 5% discount code= TRB953
Re: The most complete back of all time...
« Reply #72 on: July 05, 2008, 05:42:49 PM »
i think vitor has one of the great backs of all time tho too

joel is up there,

and yes---- even the bicep-less "oblique monster" yates had a great back

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83280
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: The most complete back of all time...
« Reply #73 on: July 05, 2008, 05:48:16 PM »
i think vitor has one of the great backs of all time tho too

joel is up there,

and yes---- even the bicep-less "oblique monster" yates had a great back

Yates pic is obviously shopped

candidizzle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9046
  • Trueprotein.com 5% discount code= TRB953
Re: The most complete back of all time...
« Reply #74 on: July 05, 2008, 05:49:22 PM »
fixed !